Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 days agoAlright guys, who shut down their farmbot yesterday? Loss of 70k users (5%), graph might be misleading feddit.orgimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1280arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1268arrow-down1imageAlright guys, who shut down their farmbot yesterday? Loss of 70k users (5%), graph might be misleading feddit.orgBlaze (he/him)@feddit.org to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 days agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·19 days agono it’s not? you can see the axes and op even mentions that it’s a 5% drop the graph is clearly just fitted to the data
minus-squareThomasLadder_69@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·19 days ago the graph is clearly just fitted to the data That’s the problem. It’s heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·19 days agoI edited the title after their comment, it wasn’t that clear at the beginning
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·19 days agoIn my classes on analytics, we were taught to prefer using normalised axes starting at 0 to more accurately put changes into perspective.
no it’s not?
you can see the axes and op even mentions that it’s a 5% drop
the graph is clearly just fitted to the data
That’s the problem. It’s heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.
I edited the title after their comment, it wasn’t that clear at the beginning
In my classes on analytics, we were taught to prefer using normalised axes starting at 0 to more accurately put changes into perspective.