• Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love good stories. RDR2 was a good story, and RDR1 is technically the sequel to it. And as I don’t like consoles, especially not buying them for one game, I’ll definitely buy it - if it runs on Linux.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          RDR1 isnt a sequel bro.
          You wouldnt call the original star wars triology a sequel, would you?

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Now that is something I can’t talk much about because I only played the prequel and not gonna pay R* the current asking price for an old game.

              But good to know.

          • Gamma@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            erm ackshually

            Why are you arguing about something that matters so little?

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Its a retroactive sequel, yes

            Sequel and prequel are relative terms. In the overarching view of the series release order: RDR1 is the prequel and RDR2 is the sequel

            In the view of the game story, RDR2 is the prequel and RDR1 is the sequel