I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This isn’t sides anymore.

    Until America wants to be tolerant of more than intolerance, it seems it will vote with its penises, wallets, and weapons.

    Edit: unnecessary apostrophe

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    you organize to pressure the burgeoise, as always, because they are the ones funding every winning political candidate.

    except for americans fascism seem to be tolerable but god forbid you learn from marxism and socialism.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think that first you have to start by admitting two things:

    1. Americans did win their/your election
    2. Americans have l9st faith in their democratic institutions

    After that, you can look at why the Democratic parties fail to appeal to Americans, and try to reform them.

    If you go outside of democracy to gain democracy, then you probably lose what’s left of your democracy.

      • Modva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah. Most people are probably experiencing the shock of what they thought the American people were vs what they are. It’s hard to understand and accept.

        As foreigners, our views are heavily affected by things like Hollywood, celebrity and visibility to the “best of America”. But the bulk of America is not that, at all. So the veneer is torn away and it’s jarring to most people.

        The only positive I see in all this is that we get to watch the US get what they voted for. Pain can be a teacher, but I doubt they can learn from it. Any and all agony from this will just be the other parties fault, always. Too much venom and malice in the politics and too little earnest substance.

        • oyo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yup, if we learn anything we will definitely have forgotten it in four years.

  • Willie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Wait 2 years, and hopefully put people who will mitigate the damage into the positions listed on your ballot. All you can do now as a law abiding citizen is wait.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I fear that the next election will be more ceremony than democracy once they have finished rigging it. At this point, I expect a third term for Trump - if he lives that long.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        He won’t. The goal was to get Vance in all along. He’s a docile pet for Thiel and co to implement their fascist agenda.

      • Willie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your fear of a 3rd term makes it all the more important to vote in your future elections. As the two term limit is imposed through a constitutional amendment, they’d need to create another constitutional amendment to reverse it. They need 2/3rds of both the house and the senate to agree to even get the ball rolling, as such, it is vital that you do what you can to prevent them from acquiring those numbers to avoid that situation.

        If it did happen, I wonder if the democrats would run Obama again.

        • Spraynard Kruger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          If Republicans remove term limits, it would be amazing to see Obama instantly get reelected for a third term in 2028.

          That being said, the USA may not get another legitimate election (help us).

          If it did happen, I wonder if the democrats would run Obama again.

        • HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          If they attempt to abolish term limits I think we’re actually going to see a civil war.

        • intelisense@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think they need a constitutional amendment, just Scotus ruling that it only applies to consecutive terms, for example.

          • Cubes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I know the supreme Court is heavily biased at the moment, but what possible logic could they use to get out of the 22nd amendment saying “no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice”? They can’t just add words there, and it isn’t ambiguous at all

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Go to your Democratic party and demand change.

    Find a candidate that will stand on the basis of free healthcare, equal rights, the right to union, enforcing a higher minimum wage, enforcing paid sick leave and a minimum of 20 days holiday a year, and committing to lowering the cost of living.

    Once someone stands up for this, push them to the moon for the next four years. Tell anyone else NOT on this platform to fuck off.

    Essentially, America needs a Project 2029.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 days ago

    Realistically? It’s too late.

    We now have an ultra-conservative SC for the rest of our lives. The Republican party openly stated and ran on making fundamental changes to our government if they won the House/Senate/Presidency and to “defeat the enemy within”.

    It doesn’t even really matter if the suffering that is coming shocks our society into rebounding in 4 years. The locked in SC and fundamental changes to our government will have already been set in place. Government departments will be run by appointees with absolutely no experience. Entire departments could be re-staffed with partisan political appointees if we are to believe the words of some of the people Trump promised to appoint. We have been placed squarely on the path to decline. That decline won’t happen overnight, but in our lifetimes it will become undeniable. We will probably barely recognize this country by the end of our lives.

    This election determined the political order we will live under for the rest of our lives.

    Buy a gun. Try to find happiness within your immediate sphere. And stay safe, if you can. Very, very few people will come out on top in the scenario we now find ourselves in. Give it a few years and you’ll see. They have total control now, so there’s no one else to blame for the decline that’s essentially guaranteed to become apparent in the near future. But I’m sure if they do fail, immigrants will be at the top of the blame list.

    It was a worthy experiment while it lasted.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    As an American, I expected most Americans to be at least semi-rational and to recognize what a threat to democracy and our way of life that Trump is. I expected most Republicans to just vote for him out of reflex, but otherwise the rest of America would rise up in our hour of need to vote against this and save us all from this idiocy.

    Nope. There was just more people lined up to vote for more idiocy. We failed the world. I’d say I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’ll help. This is America.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      They all voted with their wallets. It’s really simple. That’s how these people are able to come into power.

    • Illogicalbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 days ago

      Agree, and sadly he won the popular vote too (so far). It’s really bleak how many people don’t vote at all.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      The frustrating thing is that Trump didn’t even get more votes this election than he did last election. There wasn’t a bunch of new Trump voters that came out of the woodwork and turned the tide. He was absolutely beatable. He only won because 15 million of the people who voted for Biden last election just didn’t bother this time.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Democratic voters just aren’t dependable, or the causes that Democrats tend to champion don’t provide them any benefits. Yes, it’s often the right thing to do to champion their rights or causes, but when the time comes and their help is needed, they’re seemingly nowhere to be found because things apparently weren’t interesting enough.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lot of progressive people also moved out of red states after all of the different nonsense happening in them. We won’t know until the 2030 census if they actually do that accurately unlike the 2020 census.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes. It is too late. This was the inevitable outcome. Sooner or later.

    Dems here are like UK Labor. They’re a right wing party who occasionally cosplays as a left leaning one when they need to. They stand as the bullwark against any form of left wing populism. And they’ve done their job to the letter.

    Our economy is almost entirely debt driven financialization and gambling. There is another subprime mortgage crisis brewing. Exactly the same as the one in '08, except way bigger. And our economy is far more precarious than it was then.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not usually known for preaching peace, as I genuinely do not believe there is a peaceful way to defeat fascism. But, now is not the time to kill anyone. Violence at this moment would be ineffective and unfocused.

    For the next four years (assuming Trump is not wholesale slaughtering us) becoming a politician would be a better use of your time than engaging in violence. For the next year or two, civic engagement (or political subversion) will have more effect than physically fighting

    However, if widespread murder of the innocent begins taking place, please disregard my peaceful message.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      However, if widespread murder of the innocent begins taking place, please disregard my peaceful message.

      We’re a year deep into the slaughter of Gaza.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Gaza is about to be erased. Their genocide will be accelerated and completed in Trump’s first year.

        The local genocides here in the U.S. are going to happen over a longer period of time and may not begin right away. When they do begin, though, that is the time for violent resistance, for whatever good it might do.

  • deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Tough question. I don’t think the descendants of european, asian and african settlers are going back home any time soon.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yup, progressive politics in the US has been an exception not the rule. After about ~30 years we are just going back to business as usual. People forget segregation and women not being able to have their own bank accounts and abortion being illegal (the first time), is not something from ancient history. And before that the country literally went to war over itself over the idea that they should be able to own other huma s as property

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        These things are all true. But the history tended to go the progress direction. Slavery was abolished, so was segregation, women got more and more of their rights. Things were gradually and often painfully getting better. Now it regresses.

        • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          It’s going to take us at least a couple decades to get back on track. At that point I’ll be near retirement age. Yeah history progresses, but for me personally it’s over.

  • Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    They will over the next 4 years. Elections swing back and forth. Midterms will probably be greatly fir democrats

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not sure that we do. Not in our lifetimes anyway.

    With a functional justice department we’d have a chance. There’s nothing to stop them from tweaking the electoral lines. There’s nothing to stop them from not certifying an election. We’re about to have the scotus filled with young like-minded Republicans. We’re about to have every federal judge biased for them.

    Even having both sides of Congress the best thing we could do would be to status quo because every time a veto is overturned the scotus could just stamp it down as unconstitutional.

    The president has God King status, he can have opponents jail for executed.

    The thing is even if none of these things were in play, The popular vote just voted for a dictatorship. He was utterly and absolutely clear and anyone that says he was joking around doesn’t actually believe that they’re just too embarrass socially to announce that they themselves are racist/fascist/misogynist. There is nothing here to win back. We’re better than 50% rotten to the core and those people aren’t going away.

    Even this election wasn’t right versus left it’s right versus more right. If you put a true left candidate in they’re just going to get murdered. (That may or may not be literal)

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m not sure that we do. Not in our lifetimes anyway.

      I don’t understand this sentiment as I’m hearing it a lot.

      We’ve elected a fascist into the highest office. We’re cooked. There’s a lot we can do right now, but the most important thing is organizing. Organizing your community, your family, your town/village/city. Organizing mutual aid, direct action, and resistance. How much more do we need until people actually get off their asses and start doing something about it? Like the time for peaceful and democratic means of avoiding fascism was before the election. But a fascist is now in power, so are we going to wait until the troops are rolling down the street to do anything? I’m not saying go out and just commit wanton acts of violence in the name of revolution, but the longer we wait the more difficult it will become to get organized, involved, and yes armed.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s nothing to stop them from tweaking the electoral lines.

      Given that the Democrats have known the districts have been gerrymandered to hell and back for decades now, why haven’t they spent any time at all doing their own redistricting, rather than strongly pushing agendas that affect 0.5% of the country?

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh dems have. But you have to have control of the state to do that. Hogan (R governor) tried his damnest to unwrap central Maryland from Western Maryland.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        The first bill filed in the House of Representatives and Senate after the 2020 election which resulted in the Democratic Party gaining nominal control of Congress and the White House was a bill to ban partisan gerrymandering, require independent redistricting committees, forbid states from imposing onerous voter registration or identification regulations, limit the influence of rich donors and wealthy PACs in federal elections, and generally just make the process of voting better for Americans.

        This bill was called the Freedom to Vote Bill and was numbered H.R. 1 and S. 1 for the House and Senate versions, respectively. It passed the House of Representatives in 3 March 2021 and received unanimous support among the 50 Democratic senators when the Senate held its vote on 22 June 2021. The bill was blocked from advancing due to a Republican filibuster.

        On 3 January 2022, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York announced plans to abolish the filibuster for legislation in order to allow this bill to advance. President Joe Biden had previously indicated he would sign the bill. Schumer made his move on 19 January 2022, moving to change the filibuster rule to require continuous talking, i.e. in order to filibuster a bill, someone must make a speech and keep talking for the duration of the filibuster, with the filibuster ending when they finish talking. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin, members of the Democratic Party representing Arizona and West Virginia, respectively, got squeamish and voted against the change. All Republican senators voted against the change. This doomed the bill’s passage through Congress as the filibuster could be maintained indefinitely by the Republicans.

        The bill died when Congress was dissolved pending the November 2022 general election, in which Republicans won a narrow majority in the House of Representatives.

        Manchin and Sinema’s terms with both expire when the new Congress is convened on 3 January 2025 following the November 2024 general election. Manchin did not seek re-election in yesterday’s election and will retire at the expiration of his term. Sinema was forced out of the Democratic Party and originally planned to stand as an independent before deciding against it. She will retire at the end of her term.

        Due to the innate malapportionment of the Senate, it is exceedingly unlikely that the Democratic Party will ever regain majority control of the Senate.

        So I point my finger at these two idiots for sinking American democracy as we know it.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Even that doesn’t address the mess that exists today. It’s a great example of why they keep losing. They’re going to make it impossible to gerrymander after the lines have already been redrawn to benefit the Republicans? Why? Why would they do that? They’re essentially committing to always fighting an uphill battle for the rest of their days. I respect the principle, but not the approach. You cant lock a scale while it’s broken and then expect it to measure correctly. They need to pull their heads out of their asses and start playing to win. To start recognizing the strategies which continually defeat them, and start countering with some equally aggressive strategies of their own, or their time is done.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think I phrased my comment wrong on this. It doesn’t ban the act of gerrymandering, it bans the results of gerrymandering. Gerrymandered maps would need to be redrawn had the bill been enacted.

            This bill was no slouch. It directly abridged several states’ voter suppression laws. Had the bill passed, the next phase would have been people being able to use the federal courts to strike back against these incompatible laws.

            That being said, if you were the leader of the Democratic Party, what would you have done? Not intended as rhetorical snark, I’m just curious as to what other ideas there are.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Okay, then that sounds reasonable. Regarding your question, I suppose I would have held a primary and put someone on the final ballot who the people voted for. That would have required acknowledging before the primaries that Biden wasn’t fit to continue, which from what I’ve read, they did have full knowledge of, but refused to act upon.

              That’s easier said than done though. Right? Like I’m not directly exposed to the corruption inherent in the system and the demands placed upon them in order to secure enough campaign funds to have a chance at all. Although I don’t think sticking to the actual system as it was designed would cause the loss of donors.

              Oh, and I’d get rid of the super delegates. In short, I’d stop trying to control who gets on the final ballot to push my party agenda, and instead let the people actually elect the leader they want. Again though, that’s probably a lot easier said than done, and I’m an outsider not privy to the dealings that take place behind closed doors.