BlueskAI on the other hand…
Lol okay. Sounds good, bro.
“we promise ;)”
… for now
They also said it was decentralized which is not true.
I don’t believe this.
well there’s a protocol but everyone is on the main one, i don’t think theres even a non personal instance.
It’s open to the public. So, many other orgs are certainly doing it anyway.
The same can be said of lemmy, mastodon or any publically accessible forum
Absolutely. I worked somewhere where we routinely had alarms go off due to botnets swarming us with weird (and obnoxious) massive download tactics (of publicly available user generated content, that is).
If it can be gotten by anyone, it will be gotten by LLM trainers.
…for now.
“Bluesky has not been offered enough money to scrape user data for AI”
This seems like a clever way of saying they don’t have an AI team or plans so they have no use for the data.
Brilliant!
Why not? Are my posts not good enough for you Mr Bluesky?
Trust me bro, just keep shit posing on here, we won’t change out “ToS”
yet
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Why is this taking off but not Mastadon?
Better marketing
Which marketing and better how, exactly?
Can anyone please point me an example of Bluesky marketing that isn’t word of mouth or large-event headlines on the news?
no, this place only circle jerks about the fediverse blindly and hates anything with a modicum of attachment to reality.
It’s easier to use and has a recommendation algorithm.
Barrier of entry is marginally lower. With mastodon you’ll have to make a decision on what instance you’re creating your account. With Bluesky there’s just Bluesky.
With bluesky ,the sign up has a section where you choose a server. The bluesky server is prefilled. Otherwise you add your own.
But not having that default option and instead having to have the user go research and figure out which server to use is an immediate turn off.
Yep. 100% this.
Bluesky has the hyper casual “barrier’” of entry that Twitter had
…at the moment
Who owns this? Another insane rich, right wing techie?
