I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Almost any “pop” news / science / gossip / chat / lifestyle article site with ad and pop-up blockers off. Just. Jesus Christ. What the fuck. The fact that some people browse the internet like this… AND the fact some people actually made it in the first place…

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      I finally got my appleTV subscription cancelled, and that took three fucking tries. No, I don’t have an iPhone or an appleTV unit, so I’m now free.

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s hard to pick out one as THE worst, but generally, if I have to use the site for some external reason, the experience is awful.

    Health insurance, doctor’s offices, etc are generally pretty bad. Oddly, tax sites aren’t as rough.

    Also oddly, vacation related websites are awful.

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    Publisher’s Clearing House.

    So this company has ads on local free tv stations in the US about how you could win $5000 a week for life, but when you go to the website it’s like 97% ads and maybe 2% contests, and some contests are straight up unenterable if you have an adblocker. Then before you can officially enter, you have to go through 3 pages of ‘as seen on tv’ crap that it tries to sell you before you can finish entering. Also it lags like a motherfucker with or without an adblocker, cause there’s so many ads taking up that much bandwith, cause heaven forbid a webpage ad be a static image. And of course you have to have an account, so your spam folder and paper mailbox fill up with the worst things possible.

  • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Reddit.

    Fragile Mods. Shitty trolls. Dishonest engagements. Little to no good discussion. Opinions are seen as attacks. Power-tripping users and mods alike. Karma whores.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        Just less users, making the bots more visible. You’ve had repost bots all through, we just assumed it was actual people trying to score cheap karma.

    • Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Can’t stand the staleness. Apart from the frigging bots and automods, it feels like a bunch of boring, shallow, sated establishment guys that like “pretending that one could be hip with a mortgage payment,” as Bela Koe-Krompecher once put it.

  • I thought Twitter was a stupid idea when it first started. 140 character limit? What the fuck is the point? The fact they increased that limit shows it was dumb. Everything else about the site just gives further reason to hate it.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      15 days ago

      That limit came from the days of SMS. The idea was that you can’t go to the internet, because data is expensive, the network doesn’t exist, your dumb phone can’t even open websites etc. However, you can send SMS messages, and those things have a 160 character limit.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        Do does that mean they took an existing limitation from the SMS protocol, that didn’t apply because it used data instead and then shoehorned it into a godawful web 2.0 monstrosity all the same (and bear in mind, this is significantly reducing the unnecessary character limit!)

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          14 days ago

          In 2006 the restriction did apply. The idea was that you would type the message on a computer, and let Twitter send a few SMS messages to a small group people.

          You weren’t supposed to have millions of followers or write a full length blog post using a hundred short messages. The idea was that you cold reach people quickly even though they didn’t have access to a proper computer or the internet. So much has changed in the past 18 years…

            • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              14 days ago

              Back in the bad old days, messages cost you real world money. If you wanted to reach lots of people by SMS, it would be pretty expensive. Might as well let Twitter pay for the messages, especially when you’re just writing a public announcement.

                • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  I’ve heard some strange stories about a mysterious land on the other side of a vast ocean. In this far-away land of countless wonders, companies are only symbolically restricted by laws. This means that they can legally exploit their employees and customers in all sorts of creative ways, and charge pretty much whatever they want. Maybe you’ve heard similar wonderful tales as well?

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    I once had to use the NY State government website for info. Finally found the page. Open page up and see a blue background with dark blue font. Un fucking readable.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 days ago

    literally any restaurant website. I disabled Facebook from my entire network (pihole).

    I can no longer order food on a website because Facebook is deadzoned.

    Also, about half of big box brick and mortar online stores stopped working as well.

  • emmetcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 days ago

    In terms of social, political, and geopolitical harm, no platform beats Facebook. At least in X there are community notes. In Facebook, none of that.

  • GhostTheToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Spotify. Only website/service that makes their service intentionally worst and people still pay for it