• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    The winning or losing was almost always secondary. The main thing is to spend a load of money on wars. We’ve never failed at that.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Destabilizing other countries and exploitation of natural resources and cheap labor, in order to maintain USD and military hegemony. That’s why.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Military skill was a use it or lose it thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of the wars that the US has been fighting have been intentional, specifically in order to maintain skilled soldiers.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        Government spending in the Military Industrial Complex is the point.

        An able militia military is a side effect.