Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again?
Studied computer science. The answer is yes.
A computer is a funky thingy that’s a jumbled city of stuff turning on and off with the one master on/off thingy which is the clock on the processor.
When it switches from negative to positive a lot of small switches everywhere switch, some stay the same, some flip. It’s all just a bunch of rythm dancing of switches going off and on.
It’s all just a bunch of rythm dancing of switches going off and on.
I want this rhythm game now.
Studied computer science. The answer is yes.
NP = P, folks. Pack it up and go home.
I come from the net. Through systems, peoples and cities to this place: Mainframe. My format: Guardian; to mend and defend. To defend my new-found friends, their hopes and dreams. To defend them from their enemies. They say the user lives outside the net and inputs games for pleasure. No one knows for sure, but I intend to find out.
If you used mechanical switches, would it be possible to build a large version of some modern semiconductor chip? If so, I would expect that contraption to be slower and louder than the original.
If you’re willing to sacrifice the clock speed it’s possible. One of the issues will be that the insane amount of logic gates would have to propagate through every cycle which happens stupid fast on modern chips. Still possible to model it and do a timelapse.
It would be considerably slower, it’s also possible to make pneumatic logic gates
This is pretty cool. I don’t care how slow it is. It just shows that that it can be done. If you want something useful, use silicon. If you want something awesome, use creative alternatives like pneumatic pipes and valves. :D
We need a cells at work type of anime but about computers.
It’s all just a bunch of rythm dancing
Until some stray gamma ray hits just the right spot, flips a bit and either nothing at all of everything all at once happens.
Advanced speedrun strats.
Turning it off and on again is a universal truth. A defibrillator works by turning the heart off then on again.
(You don’t defib a patient who is flat lining. You defib to fix an erratic heart beat.)
Our University is a cosmic machine that has been running for billions of years, and as an IT guy reboots a computer when it’s been running for too long and has problems, will inevitably implode on itself and tear itself apart, which is the equivalent of God turning it off and on again.
ECT basically does that too but for brains. Too sad and Prozac isn’t fixing it? We’re gonna put you under and slap the reset button every other day until you’re not. Shit works too its fucking wild.
I believe there is also a medical treatment that consists of wiping out your white blood cells entirely so your body has to make new ones.
"Have you tried turning the immune system off then on again?’
Mostly, though there’s also fire-fighting too.
Watching the IT crowd for the 1st time with the wife. So, so funny.
It might be the best show in the universe. Or maybe not, but either way it’s funny as hell 🤣.
At a Sea Parks‽
I don’t want to talk about it.
A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.
Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: “You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong.”
Knight turned the machine off and on.
The machine worked.
One token ring to crash them all!
“Since words can be represented in binary, thus as a sequence of ones and zeroes, […], doesn’t that mean that all questions can be answered by saying no, then yes again at some level?”
How has no one pointed out yet that this is conceptually wrong? Turning something off & on again is cycling the same switch. Solutions to IT problems are setting different bits, which is binary for “using different words”.
I mean, technically speaking, it’s cycling all the switches. You use one main switch to simplify the process, but it controls all the other switches as well.
No, that’s the whole misconception here. cycling a switch means returning to the previous state. Turning it off and on again means going from ON -> OFF -> ON. Software problems are solved by going from one state to a different state.
Software problems are solved by going from one state to a different state.
Or by moving to Canada.
How dare you use logic on my computer logic-related shower thought.
But yeah, I get what you mean. I had that thought at some point after posting. This is why I should probably just keep it in this silly thread and not write any philosophy essays soon.
:P :)
Go bigger than IT problems.
Most desk jobs are simply finding information: a suitable combination of 1s and 0s until someone else agrees that the combination is correct.
Then, as a reward, the business slightly changes the 1s and 0s of my bank account.
It’s 1s and 0s all the way down.
I thought it was always DNS? 🫣
Turn the DNS off and on again, too
Until quantum comes around for everybody because then it can be zero or one at the same time. And you don’t know until you observe it.
Quantum computing will never come around for everyone. It’s entirely different technology, and what we have works quite well for what we need. A good analogy from this Cleo Abrams video is it would be like saying we no longer need cars because we invented boats
And nobody will ever need more than 128 kilobytes of RAM.
Not really.
Quantum computing is about literally solving it exponentially faster.
Think of it like brute forcing a password.
Binary it can change one character and it has to go thru all of them.
Actual quantum computing goes down multiple paths at once, so the bigger the password the more gain there is from quantum. It doesn’t have to actually try every single possible combination.
It’s not just going from 2 to 3 states, because that third state is quantum superposition and by no means just a 50% increase. That superposition is how it goes down multiple “paths” at once.
But the observer effect isn’t coming into play.
Sometimes the fix is to turn it off, take it out back and beat it with a stick.
I got a killa up inside of me
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta
Ooof. That’s deep.
Tom Knight and the Lisp Machine
A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.
Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: “You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong.”
Knight turned the machine off and on.
The machine worked.
Source: http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/index.html Section IIIA
I wasn’t expecting to see a reference to one of my favorite anime of all time. Thank you for reminding me why it’s peak.
Upvote for username :)
No, sometimes the answer is just turn it off.
