Friend has an old laptop with windows 10 that he doesn’t use because too slow and freezing all the time. Wants to revive it to leave at his lab in grad school for browsing the internet and editing stuff on google docs so he doesn’t have to carry his newer laptop everyday.

I suggested Linux but I myself always used Debian and I am not sure it will run decently with such low specs. Was thinking maybe Debian 11 with xfce or something? Any better options?

  • Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Debian, lxqt and x11.

    If you can get an ssd in there then there’s some zram or something or other that can make it even better.

  • lilith267@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Debian can be pretty light/small on a clean install and xfce should run fine on 2gb. Although the biggest thing is gonna be if the laptop has fast storage or not. Since its a celeron it might not be upgradeable, and if it doesnt already have an SSD any desktop will feel slow

    Personally if I really wanted to squeeze all the performance I could for web browsing I’d go with minimal Debian and RiverWM but thats a bit more involved

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Upgrade that box or repurpose it for something else. Web bloat has made 2gb machines useless for browsing and 4gb marginal, if the user needs Google docs, put in 8gb or more.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Your biggest problem is the amount of RAM, not the cpu. Some Linux distros would fit nicely on 2gb with a few native apps open, but the moment you’d want to browse the web, all hell will break loose, as each tab will take hundreds of megs each (youtube takes between 600 and 1200 mb of ram). FYI, even if chrome/ium is hated in these parts, it uses less ram than firefox (there’s also a setting to use even less ram).

    I’d suggest you use either Alpine Linux with xfce (240 MB of RAM on a cold boot), or even better, Q4OS with the Trinity Desktop (fork of KDE), 350 MB of RAM. The advantage of Q4OS is that it’s a debian, so it can run lots of .deb files made for debian. Alpine is cool and all, but it has bugs on the desktop (some of its package management has dependency problems).

    A tip: to save ram, don’t use background images, only a single color. You can save up to 50 MB of RAM that way, depending on the image you’d be using.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I agree the question here is not so much which distro but which browser.

      Todays low-end laptops often come with 8 GB of RAM. Even common phones have more than 2 GB of RAM.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    With low specs like that, the experience will never be great, but with a very light desktop you can make it work. Debian is fine, but with some set up, Alpine could be one option. It’s a really light distro.

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Mint.

    It’s extremely stable Linux for your grandma, that comes with every tool that she will ever use and on the cinnamon interface all those tools are exactly where she will expect them to be if she is used to using Windows.

    I’ve gotten three boomers to use it and they hardly ever ask for tech support because it’s so stable.

    • phanto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Linux Mint Debian Edition: xfce, Firefox running, 12 tabs open, just under 3GB utilized. All my usual stuff open too, Telegram, Next cloud, etc.

      I bet you’d be good with it and an SSD and a bit of swap. (I have no swap used.)

  • BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I think Slitaz is still around, I always liked that for older machines, I was going to try it on an AMD C-50 laptop I pulled out of storage recently, except I don’t have time for messing around.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    honestly the distro doesn’t matter so much as long as the hardware i supported. run a minimal desktop, disable CPU hogs and file indexing etc.

    I used fvwm on Debian for many years on old computers. worked great. now I have kde/plasma on arch. my 10 year old laptop handles it fine…

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Lubuntu has always been solid for me for low spec machines.

    With only 2 gb of RAM it will be slow, there is almost no avoiding that part.

    • Kualk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It is probably the best solution to the low memory problem, but it is also the least common and may be the most difficult.

      • SolarPunker@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        There is a xfce live edition and a good wiki. Not having systemd is a great thing for these old specs in my experience.