Hypothetically, that is.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    Making a lot of clones of myself, raising them all differently, and seeing how many of them turn out in the same way as me.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agreed, it’s an interesting thing to think about at least. The nature vs nurture debate is practically as old as time itself but it feels like we’re no closer to an answer outside of “it’s a bit of both.” But how much?

    • jef@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      AFAIK genes only account for physical properties like hair color and shit, and upbringing effects everything else.

      Source: someone I met who claimed to be a psychiatrist told me and I’ve never confirmed it or that she actually was a psychiatrist.

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just wipe out ALL mosquitoes, and then measure what the actual influence is on the food-web for other animals and plants.

    • CapitalNumbers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      no joke but i remember reading something about this aagggeesssss ago where a group of researchers modelled the effects of no more mozzies on the food chain and found that, because barely anything fucking eats them, their eradication would be negligible

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    The metal gear solid thing where you clone someone into two separate people but one gets all the recessive genes and the other gets all the dominant ones

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lobotomize all conservatives to see if their IQ increases.

    We’ve exhausted all other options.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    gather massive amounts of stats on the ideal amount of physical punishment to mete out to children to produce the best results in adults.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lock someone is a room-wide 24h fMRI or some other imaging technique to get a full recording of a human body working.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I find those rats with the NOVA1 gene fascinating. I wonder what would happen if we downright tried to give rats human-level intelligence? They are more empathetic than humans I hear, they would make the perfect replacement for our species!

    And another thing I would like to try, is to find a really big person, and see how far they can swallow me feet-first, before they run into problems, or one of us is injured.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      How can rats have human level intelligence, if we as humans have to essentially consume the whole bodyweight of a rat daily, just to sustain our very energy demanding brains.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Good point. We should try something far longer lived, but good at surviving. Crocodiles? Nah…too much work to get them intelligent. Octopuses maybe?

        EDIT: Octopi just to avoid the annoying corrections.

    • BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I hope you cut your toenails first!

      That said, I doubt anyone would have an oesophagus wide enough to accommodate anything bigger than a hand, so you might need to choose a different host species and potentially, orifice.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Seems pretty tame compared to various other answers, but keeping people under anesthesia longer than expected during surgery and seeing how it affects things like memory or personality.

    Supposedly after an open heart surgery I had gone through over a decade ago, my mother swears my personality changed. Though I can’t remember if that’s true because my memory has felt, in a sense, kinda foggy since then. So I wanna know if it was because I was under for longer than expected or because the surgery itself.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’d be interested in this too. Maybe some synapsed stop firing if they are put to sleep for long enough.

      Alternatively your mother might be gaslighting you.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I doubt she is gaslighting me because there’s not much for her to gain from her doing it. Tighter control over family is something I expect from her family rather than her.

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would wager that it’s more to do with the surgery itself. Even transient hypoxia from blood not getting to your brain for a little bit can make a big difference. Anesthesia is used very frequently with rare complications, but complex heart surgeries have higher complication rates.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sounds fair enough that it could have just been the surgery. I’m nowhere near a medical professional, but I can totally see unforseen complications having happened to me.

        • medgremlin@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Brains are very finicky things and they get very upset if there’s any disruption in their supply of glucose and oxygen, but anesthetics are carefully selected to not disrupt that as much as possible. Anesthesia might paralyze the muscles you use to breathe, but that’s what the intubation and ventilator is for. The anesthetics we use don’t affect the heart muscle because it uses different ions and chemicals than every other type of muscle in the body to generate contractions. However, open heart surgery will absolutely mess with the heart which will disrupt circulation.

  • scbasteve7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Put a hundred toddlers on an island. Leave a few older children that will disappear a few years later that are taught to fish/hunt/gather. See what kind of language develops, or what kind of civilization. How many survive?

    It is VERY unethical. Add variables to other islands, such as the amount of children, and what you teach them.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is somewhat similar to how Nicaraguan sign language was developed. Basically, kids at a school for the deaf invented it.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Who from the US government will last the longest in a bonfire. Although it might be questionable if this experiment is really unethical.