• ynthrepic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There is no challenging the military as the citizenry. This is terrible advice.

      What we should be doing is encouraging insubordination by service members. Why the fuck would you agree to use military force against your fellow Americans, on American soil? Not only is that unconstitutional, it’s simply not what you signed up for. Say no

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There is no challenging the military as the citizenry

        Says someone from the nation that mainly loses military conflicts with the citizenry…

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Most states have a token State Guard that answers only to their governor, not the federal government. If Trump keeps this shit up, states are going to start disbanding their National Guard units, and shifting them into State control.

        • CircaV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          46 minutes ago

          Except Trunp federalized the California National Guard, bypassing Newsome, that’s a pretty big problem. Newsome is suing Trunp. In the meantime - violence on citizens by cops and Trunp-allied forces continues.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Except Trunp federalized the California state force

            No, he did not. He federalized the California National guard. The State Guard is a lesser-known organization that answers solely to the Governor. They cannot be federalized. Which is why we’re probably going to be seeing states putting more of their resources into their State Guards and less into their National Guard units.

            As for the CA National Guard: Article I, Section 8, Clause 16. The State retains the sole authority to appoint the officers of the Militia.

            10 USC 246. The National Guard is the Militia.

            Newsom has the authority to appoint the officers of the National Guard. Revoking the appointments of the Commissioned and Non-Commissioned officers of the California National Guard, he effectively disbands the organization.

            Trump has no authority to override Newsom’s authority here.

      • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and most of South America would disagree with you.

        Anyway. GovCo can’t win anyway. Not even in open hot war. They don’t have the numbers.

        Military and Natl Guard combined are less than 3,000,000 people. And that includes the logistics that makes it all work. They couldn’t handle Afghanistan and its <50,000,000 people.

        • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          You overestimate how willing people are to throw their bodies at the problem. Things have to be so bad that they expect to die anyway. Otherwise, your militia sign-ups will be limited to only those most brave, ideological, or stupid.

          You also underestimate how much more effective military training and ordinances are among the US military vs militias. If they really wanted to mow down civilians, it would be fish in a barrel, even if everyone in the militia is armed.

          This is why the hope is that US service men are committed to the constitution and not to Drumpf’s orders. It’s a thin hope.

          • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            They’re committed to the paycheck. Don’t be naive. Do you think American soldiers are uniquely unable to carry out atrocities? That sweet salty buttery baby jesus is gonna reach down, touch their hearts and make them defy orders? I’ll refer you to uh, the last 25 years of action in the middle east.

            This empire is dying live on TV. And all of them so far have ended bloody. We won’t be the exception.

            • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I did say it was a thin hope (well I said ‘thing’ but I’ve corrected it now).

              But I think you give your service men too little credit. Even the police. How many fatalities or even serious injuries have actually occurred during protest activities? These a generally not people who want to kill anyone, particularly not their American brothers and sisters. But when one side dehumanizes the other, all bets are off. If things actually become life threatening, then everything changes. Kill or be killed.

              • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I’m happy to be surprised. But I have set my expectations appropriately low.

                I expect some inciting event over the summer. Someone gets killed by the feds and those protests really do turn into real riots. Then the clown prince will escalate. Open war by Christmas.

                Like I said. I’m happy to be proven wrong. I would be delighted to be proven wrong. Maybe we’ll luck out and he’ll have a stroke mid ramble or maybe some general will shoot the bastard during his military parade. But I don’t think we’re that lucky.

                Another possible is a general strike. That Union leader they black bagged earlier this week. He hasn’t been released yet. If they try to deport him on some trumped up bullshit that’s gonna have an apocalyptic backlash from basically every union except the police union.

    • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Gavin Newson specifically said that he did not ask for or need the 2,000 troops and that sending to LA would only make things worse.

      Sooo, there’s that.

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Legally I believe the National Guard must be mobilized for a legal reason and until Trump has identified an actual cause, he cannot mobilize them himself. So Newson should just order them to stand down.

        Newson hasn’t done that though.

        • sthetic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          “oh, Trump wouldn’t do that, it’s illegal”

          Phew, what a relief!

          Also, when Trump does illegal stuff, people tend to allow it and obey him. If they try to shut him down using the legal system, he goes ahead and does it anyway.

          I kind of just roll my eyes when someone says, “Aha, it’s illegal! He can’t do that!” We don’t really live in that world anymore.

          • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            My emphasis was more on Newsom not ordering them to stand down. They’re under his command until a legal order from the POTUS supercedes his command.