For Reference:

Light blue countries have restrictions (such as permanent residency) so I wanna hear your opinions as well.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    No. It would be abused and ultimately break the country so it’s no longer good for anyone.

    In order to still be a country where people can seek for a better future the first objective should be maintain the country prosper, and that would need some restrictions.

    If you just look for the short term you would be advocating everyone for a terrible future. Even if you are well intended and think that allowing a limitless number of people to stablish seeking for a better life (which is what would happen), ultimately the system will be unable to hold and we all will fall together.

    We must be smarter and think of a system that can keep improving people’s life for the foreseeable future.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It would be abused and ultimately break the country

      Exactly. But that can happen when citizens have children too. We can’t be too careful when we’re talking about protecting our ideal society.

      Everyone, even children of citizens, should have to apply for citizenship and be granted it. Otherwise they get deported.

            • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              And to add to it. Fun fact, literally all studies of economic impacts of immigrants show they are a boost to the nation they move to and not a burden. You treat it as a given that a person not currently in their nation of origin puts stress on that system beyond what they added to it.

              That is fantasy driven by very racist presumptions supported by no facts, only feelings.