• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So it was always useless bullshit? You’d think tensions would be ramping up at this point in terms of terrorism threats

    • DBT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, there was actually a case years ago (not too long after 9-11) of a man bringing a bomb on a plane in his shoe. Passengers stopped him as he tried to light it on the plane.

      IIRC that’s when they started making people take off their shoes. I could be wrong about that part but that’s how I remember it.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well I also remember that, but it doesn’t mean making people take their shoes off actually improves safety. And the point I’m making here is, if they are not doing that anymore, doesn’t it mean they don’t think it helps? If it doesn’t help now, then why would it have ever helped?

        • DBT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It would’ve prevented the guy we’re both talking about from sneaking a bomb on the plane in his shoe.

          I don’t think they’re taking it away now because they don’t think it helps. I think they’re taking it away because people don’t like doing it.

          Maybe they think the number of people who will try that again is low. Maybe they have other ways of detecting something like that now. Who knows.

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It would’ve prevented the guy we’re both talking about from sneaking a bomb on the plane in his shoe.

            He would have known they were going to make him take his shoes off and so tried something else instead that would probably have been more likely to work.

            I think they’re taking it away because people don’t like doing it.

            But we’ve never liked doing it

            • DBT@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              We can speculate about what could’ve happened instead all day, but that doesn’t change the fact that what he actually did was hide a bomb in his shoe, and this would have prevented that specifically.

              I’m actually curious what you think would have been more likely to work?

              • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                I don’t think anything is more likely to work. I don’t think they are capable of preventing terrorist attacks on planes directly, just like they aren’t capable of preventing any mass killings. I think TSA procedures are there to serve the purpose of pretending that they can. If it isn’t happening, it’s because no one happens to be trying hard enough. The only thing that could work is creating an overall situation in society where people are less motivated to do it, not preventing specific acts.