• missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So the story is that this is because they can’t manufacture carts smaller than 64GB, but why is that? Can’t they use whatever they’ve been using for Switch 1 carts? The dual-mode Switch 2 Edition carts are cross-compatible with Switch 1, so we know it’s definitely possible to use those carts.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I suspect, just by looking at the current market regarding microsd cards, that anything smaller than 64gb would actually be MORE expensive than the 64gb. going from 64 -> 32gb adds 2ct/gb, going down to 16 adds nearly 3ct/gb in addition, and i suspect that they would love to price the smaller cards even higher because the margin must be pretty tight by now if i compare the prices with what they were a few years back.

      Also, production for smaller sizes has probably shifted down dramatically in the last years when i look at availability.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Cost/gb doesn’t matter if you’re not using the excess space, so that’s not really the right way to look at it. Suppose a 64gb cart costs $5, 32gb costs $4, and 16gb costs $3. If a game only needs 16gb, they’d save $2, regardless of the /gb.

        And of course, Switch 1 carts are still being manufactured in those sizes. Not like they’re halting all production of S1 titles overnight.