From Newsweek in February 2025

The names include:

  • Ghislaine Maxwell
  • Virginia Lee Roberts Giuffre [Epstein victim]
  • Prince Andrew of England
  • James Michael Austrich
  • Philip Barden
  • REDACTED
  • Cate Blanchett
  • David Boies
  • Laura Boothe
  • Evelyn Boulet
  • Rebecca Boylan
  • Joshua Bunner
  • Naomi Campbell
  • Carolyn Casey
  • Paul Cassell
  • Sharon Churcher
  • Bill Clinton
  • David Copperfield
  • Alexandra Cousteau
  • Cameron Diaz
  • Leonardo DiCaprio
  • Alan Dershowitz
  • Dr. Mona Devanesan
  • REDACTED
  • Bradley Edwards
  • Amanda Ellison
  • Cimberly Espinosa
  • Jeffrey Epstein
  • Annie Farmer
  • Marie Farmer
  • Alexandra Fekkai
  • Crystal Figueroa
  • Anthony Figueroa
  • Louis Freeh
  • Eric Gany
  • Meg Garvin
  • Sheridan Gibson-Butte
  • Robert Giuffre
  • Al Gore
  • Ross Gow
  • Fred Graff
  • Philip Guderyon
  • REDACTED
  • Shannon Harrison
  • Stephen Hawking
  • Victoria Hazel
  • Brittany Henderson
  • Brett Jaffe
  • Michael Jackson
  • Carol Roberts Kess
  • Dr. Karen Kutikoff
  • Peter Listerman
  • George Lucas
  • Tony Lyons
  • Bob Meister
  • Jamie A. Melanson
  • Lynn Miller
  • Marvin Minsky
  • REDACTED
  • David Mullen
  • Joe Pagano
  • Mary Paluga
  • J. Stanley Pottinger
  • Joseph Recarey
  • Michael Reiter
  • Jason Richards
  • Bill Richardson
  • Sky Roberts
  • Scott Rothstein
  • Forest Sawyer
  • Doug Schoetlle
  • Kevin Spacey
  • Cecilia Stein
  • Mark Tafoya
  • Brent Tindall
  • Kevin Thompson
  • Donald Trump
  • Ed Tuttle
  • Emma Vaghan
  • Kimberly Vaughan-Edwards
  • Cresenda Valdes
  • Anthony Valladares
  • Maritza Vazquez
  • Vicky Ward
  • Jarred Weisfeld
  • Courtney Wild
  • Bruce Willis
  • Daniel Wilson
  • Kathy Alexander
  • Miles Alexander
  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Here’s the thing I suspect they will use to wriggle out from under this: the constitution says you can’t jail someone simply for affiliation with a person or organization. You have to have evidence they committed an actual crime.

    And since evidence doesn’t matter anymore, there’s nothing we can do. Nothing legally anyway.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    RETRACTION

    A previous version of this article contained a list of names purportedly listed on the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs. This was an error; the listed names were mentioned in court documents connected to alleged Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre’s claim against Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

    This is misinformation.

  • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    While I want them to release as much information as possible, this list seems misleading. The article says this is a list of people who flew on the plane, and many of them are not accused of any wrongdoing.

    Maybe I’m wrong, but I’d be quite surprised if Cate Blanchett was looking for erotic massages from underage girls. The list of people who ever flew on the plane is going to be massive, and not all of them will be the type of people who he allowed into his criminal conspiracy. It’s just like how many more people attended a Diddy Party than attended a Diddy Party After Dark.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Much like with a diddy party, part of the question then becomes “how many of them didnt attend a diddy party after dark because they knew what happened after dark?”. How many of these people might not have been molesters, but still knew about the shit that was going on? How many of them saw the underage girls around without actually being involved with them being there at all?

      I work in a very affluent environment environment, and its a relatively open secret that 10-20 years ago it wasnt uncommon for adult house parties to knowingly invite local underage highschool girls (for what Im sure were not good reasons)

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are a lot of sides to this. Some of them may have seen things and been oblivious, others may have seen things that registered later, while still others may have known about the crimes. That is why we need more than a flight log list.

        I grew up in a very affluent family, and attended all sorts of political and corporate events in my youth along with my cousins. None of us were exploited or invited there to be exploited—our families thought it was good for us to meet influential and powerful people because they (foolishly) believed those people represented the best of American society. In some cases they were, in other cases they were later found out to be criminals. The thing that makes these people so dangerous is that they have many different modes, and are masters of switching masks depending on the audience.

        • krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          If this played out like a procedural crime drama, the DoJ would be interviewing everyone on these flight logs to figure out who is connected to crimes and how much everyone knew at the time. That will never happen, since all of these people have lawyers on retainer and won’t answer anything.

          I mean, even if they are innocent and were totally unaware of any wrongdoing, they still wouldn’t willfully open themselves up to this questioning.

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Names appearing on the unsealed list are not an Epstein “client list” or a list of those who were on his flights. Many of those whose names appear in the documents aren’t accused of wrongdoing.

      The way I read it this list means pretty much jack all. It’s just names mentioned in a court case - not a client nor fly list.

      I won’t be surprised if there would be significant overlap, but without the actual list there’s little to say.

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Totally agree. Epstein had thousands of contacts in his lifetime. The “willing to fly on a plane” list is likely going to be larger than the “willing to fuck a kid” list, even though some people will be on both.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh no! He’s on the list. What are we going to do!?

    Seriously though. If alligator auzwich didn’t raise an eyebrow, confirming something already known is supposed to do it?

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      If conservatives hate pedo’s as much as they say they do they should at least be a little interested

      • VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m convinced none of them care about children. Force them to be born then abandonned or shot in school or raped also if by any chance they manage to grow up make sure they have massive depts and can never own anything. Their slogan should be “Fuck the Children” literally.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah this “Redacted” person sure is on the list a bunch of times… Also, it must be one of those single name deals like “Cher” or “Madonna”

      (/s because this is the internet)

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder who the redacted people are. Also, look at the Streisand effect coming into view.

    • krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The official line is that they are victims who were trafficked.

      Pam Bondi said back in February that they would release the list as soon as they had redactions for all of the victims.

      • citizensongbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Don’t worry, you’re right to be surprised. It’s the current conspiracy theory leaped upon by morons. Stephen King recently claimed the “Epstein list” doesn’t actually exist, and people automatically jumped to the conclusion that he was agreeing with Trump, who is also saying the list doesn’t exist. It seems far more reasonable, given King’s very public disdain for Trump, that he’s pointing out the “Epstein list” has only ever been talked about by people who used it for political advantage.

        Think about it: you’ve been hearing for years about the list from a wide variety of talking heads and everyday people, but have you ever seen any actual evidence that such a list exists besides a bunch of “trust me bro”?

        I hope the list exists. I’d like it to exist. But it’s perfectly plausible that it was just another lie by the party famous for lying.

  • 0li0li@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, if I was unlucky enough to be attracted to minors, too would try to get in a position of power or get rich enough to be above the law, like a lot of these people…

  • Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Stephen Hawking should have all of his achievements stripped and all mention of his contributions removed from all records and history books immediately. Viewing that terrible movie will automatically make you worse than a Nazi.

    Everyone already knew Michael Jackson was a kid fucker, but he’s cool somehow

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is not a diddler list, this is a “ride on the plane” list. Some of these folks may have seen nothing, others may have seen something, others yet might be directly involved.

      The question is: who knew what?

      • Jomega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m not sure professor Hawking could molest anyone even if he wanted to, what with him not being able to use his legs and all.

        ^ Boy, that’s certainly a rare sentence I just typed.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          That’s weird. He absolutely could have underage girls do sexual things to him or around him.

          • Jomega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I just can’t wrap my head around the idea of a predator in a wheelchair, mechanically speaking. Does your penis even work if your whole lower body is paralyzed? Maybe it’s better if I don’t think about it too much.