• Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      146
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      100% this. This will be the hit list they want to go down. Pardon Maxwell, then say listen…here are the names (with no evidence but her word). Then they start making arrests. Probably 5 or less GOP members, the rest nobodies and Dems.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They won’t arrest anyone. If they do, everything about this whole process will be subpoenaed and plastered in public for all to see.

          • fodor@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Precisely. They don’t need to arrest anyone for that crime because they can just lock people up whenever they want anyway. It’s interesting that you realized the law doesn’t matter but couldn’t apply it one step earlier in the process.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Plot twist: Trump issues a blanket pardon for Maxwell, and all the Democrats she names. Whether or not they actually did it, for precisely that reason. If they prosecuted them, then the government have to prove it’s case. But Trump can pardon anything for any reason, even shit he makes up.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’ll piss off his base because he’s supposed to be the savior, not the swamp or something. They’ll release the “names” and then nothing will happen because, exactly like you said, then they don’t have to prove it.

            • dhork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              He doesn’t need the base anymore. If he holds on to power past Jan 2029, he won’t need their votes to do it. He won’t need any votes at all.

              • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                Public opinion always matters. Even kings needed their people on their side; why do you think they made up all that divine right bullshit and had the churches preach it so much?

                Every country has the government that a sufficient number of people are willing to tolerate. Tyranny can only tip the scales, it cannot change the game. If a populace doesn’t want to be ruled, it cannot be ruled. That’s why fascism relies so heavily on the imposition of a hierarchy; because the people who aren’t at the bottom will support the system that gives them someone else to tread on, while the rich and the powerful live it up at the top. But you always need to keep a significant sector of the population on your side. There always has to be an in group who benefit enough from the government to want to keep it.

                Governments end when enough people want them to end. Democracy is just a way of doing it politely.

      • dickalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes, but this might be mutually assured destruction when Clinton says hey fuck you and starts naming his own names