• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Those things run on fiscal years, not calendar years.

    But if the House resumes, they have to sit the new members, which means there’s enough to force a procedural vote on releasing the Epstein list.

    They’d rather prevent that then do the single filibuster proof bill a year they can get past the Senate.

    trump will just keep doing shit and fighting in court than try to pass real laws.

    The risk for them is all this combined with the DNC finally pulling their heads out of their ass and fighting for down allot spots again.

    We’re not just gonna see a blue wave, we’re gonna see an actual.progressive wave of people who want to fight fascism.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      But if the House resumes, they have to sit the new members, which means there’s enough to force a procedural vote on releasing the Epstein list.

      You know? My tinfoil hat says this is why Trump wants to push the Insurrection Act through. Then when it’s pushed through, they can resume the session and when they try and bring the vote for releasing the files he has all Dems arrested for treason.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The risk for them is all this combined with the DNC finally pulling their heads out of their ass and fighting for down allot spots again.

      We’re not just gonna see a blue wave, we’re gonna see an actual.progressive wave of people who want to fight fascism.

      As much as I’d like to see the birth of an actual progressive party, I think it’s more likely we’ll see the birth of a more moderate version of a Republican party; voters that would today vote for a Bush Jr President over a trump.

      • zd9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think we’ll see some real progressives, but billionaire elites like Koch, Thiel, etc. are going to let that happen over their dead bodies. They’ve come this far, and they’re damn sure not going to let some idiot kids force them to give up even 1% more of their power/money. Until they’re dealt with appropriately (legally), we’re not going to have real progressive change.

      • zd9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I know right… People have been saying this for TEN years. “The conservative party is going to die out as more old people die off” was the big one in the late 2000s. Then the Republican elite slimeballs realized that was probably true so they invested billions into astroturfing new conservative support, along with all the fascist bullshit too of course.

        What we’re seeing now is the result of decades of disciplined effort from Republican/billionaire strategists and lobbyists, and it’s paid off a ton. I don’t think it’s going anywhere for the next few years at least.

        • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Unfortunately, stupid old people have raised stupid young people, and they’re replacing themselves with gusto

          I’m eternally grateful to live in a civilised country