With wealth inequality and billionaire control over American society growing ever more obscene, it’s well past time to implement a maximum wage limit.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    1000x annual minimum wage is 14.5 million. That’s not the savings of the worker class (a conservative investment would provide enough return to live without working). And the point is that it’s tied to minimum wage. Want to be taxed less on your wealth? You gotta raise the minimum wage.

    You’re right in saying it’s a bit more complicated than that–my two point suggestion is oversimplified–but my original point stands: the solutions are less complicated than getting rational legislation passed in a system where the checks and balances are bought out.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ooof, how did I fuck up themath that badly? At 14+ million it’s different. That’s a lot of wealth compared to the average upper middle class family.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is the way you judge what’s wealthy to look at your own situation and target something comfortably above that? There’s plenty of people who will surmise that your situation is comfortably better than theirs once that power is available to the public.

        • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You don’t have to base it on your own situation, you can base it on cost of living or other objective values.

          There’s a big difference between 1 million and 10 million. With a modest 5% return on investment, 1 million nets you $50,000 per year, which is enough to support a very modest lifestyle in some places (near poverty in others). 10 million with the same investment nets $500,000 per year, which is more than enough to retire to a very luxurious lifestyle and accumulate more wealth along the way.

          And that’s still less than the 14.5 million I proposed, so that person would still not see any wealth tax.

        • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          No it’s based on a ton of actual hard statistics that focus on relative buying power vs what the state supplies. Many Europeans who make less than I do have a higher QoL than I do because their education and healthcare are subsidized/free.

        • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s wildly different.

          $1 million invested at 5% is $50,000 annually. $10 million invested at 5% is $500,000 annually.

          That’s the difference between the working and wealth classes.