• cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bill Gates said too many resources are going toward climate change instead of issues like welfare and poverty…

    In the letter, Gates called out the “doomsday view” of climate change and said leaders need to make a “strategic pivot” to focus on issues that have the “greatest impact on human welfare.”

    “It’s the best way to ensure that everyone gets a chance to live a healthy and productive life no matter where they’re born, and no matter what kind of climate they’re born into,” he wrote.

    The “generative AI” part of the headline is not particularly relevant to the article, but is a great test to see who reads the article before rushing to comment.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bill Gates was recently at the meeting where all the US tech oligarchs kissed Trump’s ring. The article changes nothing about how Bill Gates is very much part of the problem, and this “change” is exclusively based on his oligarch reasons.

    • FoxyFerengi@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Bill Gates knows better than most that there’s enough money in the world to try and tackle both climate change and poverty, and still leave him a billionaire.

      I think the wording that really bugs me in his quote is “healthy and productive life”. If all the alarms are true we’re already fucked on climate, so he’s concerned about maintaining a labor force.

      • evenglow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not money. It’s timing. You really want UBI before automation. There’s never been a push for AI and robots like this before.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          UBI is a pipe dream. Capitalists would never agree to pay for it. And it wouldn’t even matter if they did. Under capitalism, companies and landlords would just raise rent and prices if we all had UBI. Exactly what happened with the Covid stimulus programs.

          No, unfortunately the only solution is to do away with capitalism entirely and start doing socialism instead.

        • GreatAspie86@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Everyone wants UBI but no one explains how that shit would work. And you can bet that you would only get enough to barely subsist in such a system as you are just being paid fake money to exist. That’s no world for humans to thrive in.

          • running_ragged@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I think the idea is if you’re guaranteed a subsistence pay, then you are free to devote your time to creating something. Art, a business, a community, whatever that makes your life meaningful, rather than devoting 90% of your time working for someone elses profit, travelling to work, resting to be able to work, and eating to continue to work.

            You want to talk about bare subsistence, that is what most people are doing now in terms of time as a resource.

            • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              In our system what would prevent basic necessities from costing “UBI + some amount” after it’s implemented? If this is something that you want to happen, you won’t get it by just discussing the benefits while ignoring/downvoting any sort of critical discussion of it.

              • running_ragged@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 minutes ago

                I think that is a tough one. As long as we accept the value of a thing is what people are willing to pay for it, the prices will always climb.

                For essential products and services, the value should be based only on the effort required to provide or produce it.

                The main reason we’re dealing with our current inflation has everything to do with the amount of cash flowing upwards from the working class to the boardroom and shareholders.

                The prices are going up on essential items because people can’t afford to not buy gas, or not eat, or not rent. They need those to stay employable, and they slowly sacrificed everything else to keep those. So the price goes up, and people keep buying it, telling the heartless corporations that they can raise the prices more.

                Now we have significant portions of the population using short term loans or payment plans to buy their next weeks groceries.

      • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        A cynical view would be that he realizes that we as a species are doomed, and wants everyone to at least be comfortable as the world becomes unlivable for us.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Actual headline:

      Bill Gates softens ‘Climate Disaster’ approach, says strategy needs to shift: Interview