Since Trump’s election, gun groups catering to progressives and people of color report a surge in interest as they look to defend themselves in a country that, to them, feels increasingly unstable.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    As an American, I’m curious why you think civilians owning modern rifles made for war is wrong.

    And before you respond, I want to make clear that I am intentionally loading the question to try to dissect the topic openly, without bias. Think of me as a free thinker, somebody who is open minded, possibly naive.

    I want to know truly what your reasoning is, and if it can stand up to my values and understanding, and vice versa.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Guns are the number one cause of death for American children, after automobiles, and America already has a higher automobile death rate than virtually all it’s comparable peers.

      Since 1999, 400,000 American children have died needlessly.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        If you remove all guns, there will still be a thing that is number one.

        Same with automobiles. “Needlessly” is extremely undefined. Lots of things occur that are needless or claimed to be needless.

        Also what’s with that seemingly arbitrary year? Why 1999? Is that the year that the Columbine shooting happened? Guns were around before then. Why did school shootings suddenly become popular then? DID school shootings become more popular then? Can we reverse that change?

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          If you remove all guns, there will still be a thing that is number one.

          The children who are not gunned down will not be killed by something else. It just lowers the overall death rate.

          “Needlessly” is extremely undefined. Lots of things occur that are needless or claimed to be needless.

          No it’s not. It’s defined in relation to the child death rates of peer countries.

          https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2820614

          • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Finally.

            Okay, so, statistically, gun deaths in the US are strongly correlated to a distinct increase in premature death in kids.

            And that statistic makes owning assault rifles wrong, because, if you remove the rifles from the populace, those deaths would go away. Yeah?

            I’m so for those deaths no longer happening, but I also like having an armed population to fight off, at this point, fascism, if it ever comes to that. Is there another way, where we can have our guns and our children, too?

            Is there correlation that having an armed population with assault rifles always causes school shootings? Is there evidence of it not? Switzerland seems good. Really good gun control for a militia system. I’d be really happy with moving to that. Though, I think the issue Americans would take is that it’s a government militia system and we’re supposed to defend against our own government.

            But, why? Oh god… Don’t tell me this is further southern bullshit “states rights” stuff. I mean, at this point, yeah, we literally have a fascist occupation and right now is not the time to disarm.

            But maybe that’s the reason. The long-standing conflict between North and South in the USA may be THE reason nobody trusts the government and everybody wants to be armed; there’s a low key cold war going on between the north and south that has never been resolved, and a side effect is that when the population is deeply stressed and unhappy, shit like school shootings happen.

            The guns are a sign of non-unity.

            So, fix the conflict, the guns may go away on their own over time.

            But asking people to disarm is like getting the world to de-nuke. And asking people to do it during conflict is… Well, good luck. Because even if the guns don’t provide protection in all instances, it definitely helps people feel more powerful. Though, in my experience it seems to have a calming effect since the people I’ve known don’t want to kill somebody, so they deescalate or leave a situation. I’m going to assume that’s the norm, but it doesn’t change the statistical fact that school shootings are prevalent.

            The issue with removing the ARs from the equation is, multifaceted, obviously. It’s a right that you don’t get back, good luck getting everybody to disarm, compensation, it’s really engrained in culture for a lot of people and you have to convince them to basically change huge aspects of their lives, their hobbies, their heritage, their values, and worldview.

            Do you see any of this differently?

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yes, I see it differently. Notice how literally every single other country in the entire world doesn’t do what the US does?

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No it is not. That number was an outlier during covid. It’s back to car accidents. On top of that, the stats in the child deaths include 15-19 year olds, most of which are from gang shootings, not random 5 year olds being shot.

        The way the anti-gun groups do numbers is specifically designed to make people think that toddlers are being killed every 2 seconds. More children drown every year in pools than by gun deaths, yet no one is screaming to outlaw pools. At the end of the day, most don’t care that kids are dying. They care how they die.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          On top of that, the stats in the child deaths include 15-19 year olds, most of which are from gang shootings, not random 5 year olds being shot.

          Yeah. So?

          More children drown every year in pools than by gun deaths, yet no one is screaming to outlaw pools.

          I do not understand why gun nuts cannot fathom the difference between something that has utility and can result in death, and something that serves no function other than being a point and click murder machine.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yeah. So?

            And there it is, the same disingenuous that the right uses for thier bullshit causes.

            I do not understand why gun nuts cannot fathom the difference between something that has utility and can result in death, and something that serves no function other than being a point and click murder machine.

            A pool has no use, you cannot use it for defense or putting food on the table. A firearm is a utility that has purpose. Fascist are literally snatching people up off the streets and you’re still arguing why no one should have firearms.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              And there it is, the same disingenuous that the right uses for thier bullshit causes.

              It’s not disingenuous in any way shape or form.

              You have basically said that children killed in gang shootings don’t matter. Try not to throw right wing shade around when you’re parroting their racist talking points about which people do and don’t matter.

              A pool has no use, you cannot use it for defense or putting food on the table.

              Lmao, bruh, it’s this niche little exercise called swimming, you might have heard of it. Try and pull your head out of your ass before pointing us to all the examples you have where ICE has been stopped by people with guns.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                It’s not disingenuous in any way shape or form. You have basically said that children killed in gang shootings don’t matter. Try not to throw right wing shade around when you’re parroting their racist talking points about which people do and don’t matter.

                It absolutely is.

                https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/24/health/drowning-water-safety-swimming-children-wellness

                Drowning is the leading cause of death in children ages 1 to 4, and after motor vehicle accidents, it is the second leading cause of death attributed to unintentional injuries among kids ages 5 to 14.

                Gang violence is not a gun issue. It’s a educational, safety nets, and jobs issue. Aka social issue that doesn’t magically get corrected because you banned guns.

                Also GTFO with the racist shit. I’m a minority and it’s a dog whistle for you to say “the facts don’t matter, cause it’s racist”. Shit doesn’t get better when you deflect like that. Tough conversations are required to solve tough issues.

                Lmao, bruh, it’s this niche little exercise called swimming, you might have heard of it. Try and pull your head out of your ass before pointing us to all the examples you have where ICE has been stopped by people with guns.

                We’re not at the start mill ICE phase yet. We still have judges blocking shit. You don’t start a civil war just because shit is getting bad.

                • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  Gang violence is not a gun issue. It’s a educational, safety nets, and jobs issue.

                  Omg, so the US is the only country that ever experienced a lack of jobs?

                  Oh no! How I could be so stupid and forget that the US is a unique special snowflake child that doesn’t experience any of the same pressures of literally any other country on earth!

                  Grow the fuck up amerocentric child.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I do not understand why gun nuts cannot fathom the difference between something that has utility and can result in death, and something that serves no function other than being a point and click murder machine.

            There is obviously a lot you don’t understand, and until you do, you should probably not try to debate.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Make a relevant argument, or keep your mouth shut. No one needs to hear you talk other than you.