• SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      They don’t need to die, they need to go back to what they used to be. The first copyright law was called the Statute of Anne and it covered a work for 14 years.

      That’s a totally reasonable amount of time for an author/publisher to make their money. And it’s reasonable for creators to want to get paid for their work.

      And then it should be public domain.

      • yunglucifer@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        No, they need to die.

        If you can’t protect your own ideas, you shouldn’t get to rely on the government to do it for you.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          How are you proposing that people protect their own ideas?

          Say you write a book. You self-publish. A big publisher CTRL-C/CTRL-Vs your book and publishes it themselves with their access to distribution networks and advertising budgets. Now you sell 0 copies of your book while the publishing house makes millions.

          What should you have done differently?

          Copyright laws were invented to protect creative people against publishing monopolies.

          • yunglucifer@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            How is the publisher making money if everyone can copy and redistribute it for free themselves?

            Edit: Loving the downvotes from useful idiots. Keep getting taken for a ride 👍

            • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I can’t believe people disagree with this point I am unable to explain. My utter lack of self awareness and critical thinking skills inform me that they’re all idiots, not I!

              Yuuup.

            • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              You didn’t answer my questions

              To answer yours, beyond what i already laid out in the question itself, the original Night Of The Living Dead has been out of copyright for decades, and yet corporations still make money off it.

              • yunglucifer@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                11 minutes ago

                How do they make money off of it?

                Do they create their own derivative work and then make money off of that because copyright laws prevent people from copying and redistributing it for free?

                Edit: They didn’t have an answer because they know I’m right. They respond with insults rather than admitting they’re wrong.

                This is why businesses that profit off of copyright and patent laws make so much profit, because they have no shortage of suckers and saps who don’t know any better proud to throw money at them.

                But hey, at least they fit in with each other, right? 😉

              • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                People can and will do that Big publishing houses cannot, because of the litigational threat.

                While I don’t uncritically support one side or the other, there are provisions for protecting the small and large alike, and I think there’s no easy answer.

                Everyone thinks the problem is easy to solve until a specific incidence lands in their lap.

  • JonHammCock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    20 hours ago

    In the end, the fight led to more than 500,000 books being removed from the Archive’s “Open Library.”

    In case you wanted to know what was lost.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m kind of amazed that only that and the 78’s archive was lost. At least there’s Project Gutenberg et al to help with the books, and meanwhile the IA does still archive a vast load of video material, software, and no doubt, other stuff.

        • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Reminds me of a certain emulation site that was hit by Nintendo’s lawyers and removed the download links for all of their games.

          Except that’s all they did. The files are still there, the game pages are still up, all that’s missing is the big shiny download button. A simple userscript can add them back and let you download the “removed” games.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not unless he became Asian. You can click on the picture in the article to make it full screen. Not Woz.