• toffi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “We’ve now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel ‘Don’t build the doomsday machine’”

  • Lembot_0005@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The result is nice and cool. It is the level of modern journalism that is disturbing.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I worry about it. Every year I see more articles with sloppy mistakes that could be caught by any half-drunk editor phoning his job in. Sites springing up publishing 90% slop clearly so someone can keep writing. Not to mention the risks to journalism in a country where the president threatens any group whose speech he doesn’t like.

      As (i think) Parenti said, now is the time of monsters. Cool robot though. That, genuinely, is crazy impressive.

      • northernlights@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean in this instance, if you look at the thumbnail of the author and then follow his link, he looks not a day over 16.

        • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Im middle-aged, anyone under 30 looks like a baby to me 😅 babies can be journalists as long as they’ve got ethics and a good editor

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seriously. How many ways are there to make an humanoid robot out of stainless steel and aluminium?

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a “straight-up Terminator”?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        So far. Since Terminators are capable humanoid robots and the goal is to make capable humanoid robots each improvement is going to look more like a Terminator. And also like every other capable humanoid robot from other sci-fi as well, good bad or neutral.

        The only reason to leap to “OMG it’s a Terminator!” Is to bait the clicks.

        • BennyInc@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Well to be fair, they didn’t have to give it machine gun arms and red glowing eyes. But maybe that’s just me.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It looks the a Terminator “under the hood”. I doubt anyone was trying to sell a “living tissue over metal endoskeleton” kinda headline.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into “hey this robot has tits”, and when they don’t, the comments turn into “humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines”.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d say “found the bot”, but even bots are familiar with why boobs appeal to human sensibilities.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    “We’re at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift.”

    What?

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    “We’re at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift.”

    What a weird fucking tagline on an article that insinuates a robotic dystopian future.

    Although there are some weird horny undertones, so I guess it checks out. Still, weird article all around

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I get you! She’s extraordinarily beautiful, and not just in a blonde hair/blue eyes kinda way. I have an admiration for any man or woman who works hard to maximize their appearance. It’s fucking hard and Swift could do nothing to be any more attractive.

      Turns out I like her music too! Kids listening to something, “That’s cool, who’s that?”

      But sexy? Maybe she’s too perfect? I like a woman that’s “off” in some way. Maybe a big nose, wide-spaced eyes, pouchy mouth, gimme some imperfections that stand out.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes, Daleks are not robots, they’re squishy tentacle space nazis inside mobile battle casing pepperpots that they call War Machines. The Terminator T1 however looks vaguely like such a pepperpot if you squint and are Doctor Who brained.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

    The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      To do what?

      Chores and other stuff we don’t/can’t do. This has been the dream for decades now, so many decade+ old encyclopedias with “future tech” chapters show robots caring for people, sometimes as caregivers (for old people, or blind etc), sometimes as entertainers.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Except regular people will struggle to afford food out whilst these will be cleaning rich people’s yachts.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Wealth inequality isn’t going away anytime soon, but that doesn’t mean you can condemn the entire field of humanoid robots as useless/unreachable for the 99%. There’s probably going to be a point when a suzuki swift (geo metro for americans) equivalent of a robot will come along.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Wealth inequality isn’t going away anytime soon, but that doesn’t mean you can condemn the entire field of humanoid robots as useless/unreachable for the 99%.

            That’s exactly what it means. Even a geo metro is a garbage machine destroying the planet that’s completely unaffordable for most of humanity.

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    This seems to be the really interesting part: “…the bot also contains the “first all-solid-state battery in the industry,” as opposed to the liquid electrolyte typically found in lithium-ion batteries. Solid-state batteries are considered the “holy grail” for electric vehicle development …”