• Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Until it’s not, which Is the biggest problem that I have with so called “link aggregators”.

        What is the use of a decentralized network of communities if all the material can still be nuked from outside?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Until it’s not

          How relevant are Firefox release notes after the subsequent release? That’s one resource I don’t mind not being archived.

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The Firefox browser itself tells me there is an update. An update could be interesting to read about here and if so I think it makes sense to make the case with the highlights. Like, why did you find it interesting enough to put here?

        Personally, I’m pretty inclined to downvote any post that is a link without a short summary or context. I appreciate that’s not everyone.

        And personally I think it’s important to say why you downvote. The poster can choose what to do with that information and I’ve got no expectations for them to change how they do things

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m pretty inclined to downvote any post that is a link without a short summary or context.

          Why? The summary of Firefox release notes is the Firefox release notes.

          I agree there should be a summary for other things, esp. videos or long articles, but for release notes, they’re already generally in a condensed format. This one is a few pictures with a couple sentences explaining what’s new in them.