Zohran Mamdani has won the race for New York City mayor, according to Decision Desk HQ, ushering in a new era of progressive politics in the city and reigniting the debate over the Democratic Party’s future.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist, is poised to become the first millennial and first Muslim to lead New York City, after a campaign that pulled off one of the most stunning political upsets in recent memory. He defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who mounted a long-shot independent bid after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in his bid to succeed Mayor Eric Adams.

Mamdani focused heavily on affordability, pledging to freeze rent, establish city-owned grocery stores and make buses free for riders. He quickly became a progressive icon as well as a polarizing figure within the party over his positions, so much so that it divided prominent New York Democratic leadership over whether to endorse him.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Empire will strike back folks. Brace yourselves and don’t self-congratulate too much, the real fight starts now. Good luck, American friends!

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    2 days ago

    A win for the people! Cuomo’s campaign expenses were $56 million, 2.5 times higher than Mamdani’s. Cuomo was mostly funded by billionaires, while Mamdani had mostly small sum contributions.

    Why are capitalists so bad at investments?? Weren’t they supposed to be the smart entrepreneurs?

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    494
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I started the day with the news that Dick Cheney is dead. Now I’m ending it with news that Zohran Mamdani is mayor. It’s been the best day in a long, long time.

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    facebook is going wild. they are circulating an image from (what they propose) is ISIS endorsing zohran for winning. the best comment was “this is like 9/11 again!”

  • ThePuy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    My country’s (very politically aligned) public news station described Mamdani as “communist” and “anti-Semitic”.

    I am always a bit disgusted by Italian public service news station, this one was particularly telling at how biased it can be.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 days ago

      TG2, right? The other day they were saying that there was no genocide at all in Gaza, just “extremely targeted attacks against terrorists”

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s so extremely targeted that it kills kids before they can become terrorist… /s

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s funny until it’s not. They literally called our kids “children of the darkness”, “little snakes”, and “future terrorists” to justify dropping 100 killotons of explosives as of August 2025, the equivalent of 66.67 of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima.

              And the world is mostly silent, and Democrats telling us to shut up and vote blue no matter who.

      • brownsugga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        No. Democratic socialism is a philosophy that believes in democracy first, socialism second.

        • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          They put Democratic in front of Socialist because in America anything leaning towards socialism is seen as authoritarian thanks to Cold War propaganda.

          • iridebikes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Well they do that because democratic socialism focuses on well-being of the populace rather than well being of the few but admittedly they are fairly toothless as their policies revolve around tax collection rather than the required restructuring of industry that would comprise a socialist system… a democratic socialist can only really affect policy through tax code.

            Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Democratic socialists believe in social programs within capitalism, they do not work against capitalism in any meaningful way.

          • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            the Democratic Socialists of America, the organization Zohran is apart of, is a big tent left organization that Includes everyone from reformist socialists to Marxist Leninists, to Anarchists and Maoists.

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Name one platform they promote that explicitly opposes capitalism, and then describe how they promote it by running not as independent but within the explicitly capitalist Democratic party.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    333
    ·
    2 days ago

    VOTER FRAUD! There’s NO WAY someone who Campaigned on Helping the Middle Class could BEAT a Sex Offender with Billionaire Sugar Daddies! There’s NO WAY!

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    So happy to see a clean sweep on EVERY major election across the country for dems and freedom. We cannot take the foot of the gas, the white house is currently working HARD to find ways to take away Mamdani’s win and hurt New Yorkers because they voted against the king.

    We need to maintain the pressure.

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Billionaire will = thwarted

    Billionaire funding = wasted

    We have a long slog ahead of us. But today was a good day.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Amen, brother/sister

      I don’t actually think he will do that much due to how stacked the powers are against him, but I think he has shown to the powers that be how reviled they are, and how they need to start playing ball with progressives if they want to win votes again

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m assuming city council is going to be his biggest obstacle?

        I reckon it’s possible, though not easy, to use that to his advantage the next time IF he does a decent enough job his first term. Keep people informed that some backwards-ass council members are voting against good policies, so the people know to vote them out next time. I hope Mamdani’s the great communicator he seems to be. A huge reason for people’s indifference and the whole “both parties are the same” issue that greatly benefits Republicans, is that people aren’t really informed about who’s voted for what. Inform people about just a few key votes that matter to them, and they may be more active in the primaries (to hopefully swap out their own party’s uninspiring old candidate for fresh blood) as well as eventually in the elections themselves.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Trump seems pretty checked out lately, as expected for someone at the very end of the effective human lifespan who already has everything and anything he wants.

      I would just love to be a fly on the wall to witness Stephen Miller’s implosion right now. He’s the sack of maggots and feces wrapped in human skin who has been effectively running the country for the last year or so because he has no qualms about taking Trump to the hilt and has earned the old man’s trust that way. He has no power on his own because he’s not liked and can’t capture even a shred of political capital like Trump has, on some level he knows when this whole thing folds he will be completely shut out of politics and may even face prosecution.

      Seeing something like Mamdani happen, as well as the blue wave that just crashed over major cities and states yesterday, is a reminder that his clock is ticking and running out faster than he would have liked. Expect to see some wild missteps from the administration over the next several months as Miller goes on an absolute bender and tries to accelerate all his half-baked nazi plans.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump already threatened to withhold funding for the city. Something I have no doubt he’ll make good on.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It is crazy what giving people to vote for something, instead just voting against someone can produce some great results. Mamdani had to take on a class on billionaires and the old DNC leadership he who didn’t want to back him. It is funny af to see Chuck the leader of Dems show vote blue no matter who was fake. He most likely voted for Cuomo.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Almost as soon as Mamdani won the primary, the DNC chair did a PBS interview talking about the important part was the platform Mamdani ran on…

      And Martin only waited till after the primary, because he legit believes a party shouldn’t be biased. But he ran Minnesota for a decade, and under his watch they went from purple to progressive as fuck.

      The only way we lose, is if people pre-emptively give up on the party and don’t vote in the primary. So there’s going to be a lot of noise trying to convince people not to trust the new party

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          We got like 30 months till presidential primaries, and the billionaires are not going to talk about how they lost control of the DNC on the media networks they bought for propaganda…

          Ignorance is the natural state, everyone is ignorant of everything until they learn it.

          But it’s not gonna be a valid excuse for much longer.

          But regardless of people’s opinion of the DNC, Martin is going to keep throwing money back at state parties, which is going to keep translating to wins downballot. And he’s not gonna stop a progressive from getting the presidential nomination.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You’ll only have to wait a few months…

              But we’re already seeing them drop out, Pelosi and some other guy aren’t seeking re-election.

              They know they can’t win a level playing field, and if they try and lose they’ll get less money from corporations in their second career.

              They want risk a fair fight, they’ve never had it in them. So a lot are going to Paul Ryan off to the sunset and just let progressives have it, hoping it fails and they can pop back up

      • spaduf@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Martin only waited till after the primary, because he legit believes a party shouldn’t be biased. But he ran Minnesota for a decade, and under his watch they went from purple to progressive as fuck.

        To be correct. Ken Martin hates DSA and socialists. Most of his time in Minnesota was spent purging DSA members from the party. Minnesota went left in spite of him.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        You have such a hard-on for Ken, despite the fact that he’s a typical centrist lib who in his own words is happy to continue taking money from “good billionaires”.

        I cant wait for the day you realise what he actually is and stop spreading the propaganda.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          How about we implement a progressive income tax, no loopholes, instead of fixating on an arbitrary number like fucking dumbasses? How much money CAN one have from which you’d still take money?

          Drop the fucking buzzwords. This isn’t a game.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Oh hey it’s this troll again. Please you never answered the last time you made this bogus claim - What are these buzzwords you keep imaging.

            This has nothing to do with taxation, the issue is money in politics.

            Please before bothering me any more on this site, take the time to actually read what has been said you’ve now made this ridiculous completely unrelated statement twice now.

            • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Lol, what’s a greater sign of one’s insecurity in their own argument than instantly labeling “troll”. Pathetic.

              Please you never answered the last time you made this bogus claim

              Is that how language works? One’s own claim requires an answer? I thought answers followed questions. What do you even think is “bogus”. Fucking income tax?

              What are these buzzwords you keep imaging.

              “Billionaire”. It’s fucking arbitrary and it removes the focus from where it should be. “Centrist lib”, you sound like a Trumper for fuck’s sake.

              This has nothing to do with taxation, the issue is money in politics.

              Oh and ONLY billionaires can put money in politics? Someone with a hundred million, you wouldn’t have a problem with that? What is your cutoff? A lot of rich people put money in politics precisely so they can get tax breaks. So no, they’re not unrelated. And every time you allow a Republican to come to power over the “centrist lib”, you do the super rich a massive favor.

              Please before bothering me any more on this site, take the time to actually read what has been said you’ve now made this ridiculous completely unrelated statement twice now.

              More pathetic posturing to obscure your weak argument. That’s all this is. It’s not my fault you’re too goddamn stupid to understand either why they put money in politics nor how you actually help them.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s no “new party”. Democrats won in Virginia by being centrist. Not every part of the country is exactly the same.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          But they won. Because the alternative was a literal maga crazy person who doesn’t think prejudice against LGBT people is discriminatory.

          Now, you can be unhappy that it wasn’t some mystical ultra progressive (that wasn’t even running in the race)… or you can be happy that at least the needle didn’t shift even further right. Now that’s not to say “Vote Blue NMW”, but it will be easier to field progressives in the future from Spanberger’s position, than from Winsome’s. And maybe next time, the magical lefty messiah Lisan al Gaib will be running and the choice will be between them vs the centrist democrat, instead of a centrist democrat vs a literal smoothbrained maga dummy.

          • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            But they won.

            I certainly didn’t dispute that. Both won by running races that best appealed the majority of voters in their electoral areas. People here are somehow mad that we got the governorship of Virginia? The confirmation bias is ridiculous.

            Because the alternative was a literal maga crazy person who doesn’t think prejudice against LGBT people is discriminatory.

            Yeah, welcome to much of America that isn’t NYC, a major urban metropolis. And Mamdani still had decent opposition from a sex offender. Gonna ignore that? If you try, you could downplay his victory as much as hers but why would you? They’re both wins. Winning shouldn’t divide us. Also, it’s bit easier for a Democrat to win the mayoralty of NYC than it is the governorship of purple Virginia.

            Now, you can be unhappy that it wasn’t some mystical ultra progressive (that wasn’t even running in the race)… or you can be happy that at least the needle didn’t shift even further right.

            I’m happy in either case. All I care about is a pragmatic approach that moves society in the way I most agree with. Allowing Donald Trump to come to power doesn’t qualify.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not to say there isn’t, because we’ve seen that doing so is how you get people like Trump and voter apathy.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not every part of the country is exactly the same.

          Almost like not every part of the party is exactly the same?

          The “new” part is being nonbiased instead of ridiculously biased.

          If you’re confused and something sounds like it doesn’t make sense, ask questions instead of making assumptions

          • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Almost like not every part of the party is exactly the same?

            That supports my point, it doesn’t dispute it.

            The “new” part is being nonbiased instead of ridiculously biased.

            What the fuck does that mean? Non-biased, is that a joke? People, trying to divide the party to help Republicans win, are obviously biased. I on the other hand accept both wins in NYC and Virginia while you accept only NYC.

            If you’re confused and something sounds like it doesn’t make sense, ask questions instead of making assumptions

            I didn’t express confusion or uncertainty. This is a pathetic argument tactic that intentionally avoids the topic at hand.

            Stop trying to divide the party. That’s how you uncompromising ideologues gave us a second Trump presidency.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I think the problem is you don’t understand what the DNC is…

              If you chill out and try to have a civil conversation, I can help

    • krox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      A-fuckin-men! I hope the dnc also gets their head out of their ass and starts embracing the left side.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The DNC is owned by billionaires, the sort the DNC chair Ken supports and defends their right to play economic kingmaker.

        There is zero chance the DNC gets their head out unless a leftist somehow takes over ala Mandani.

            • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, it’s almost like there were separate elections or something.

              What a stupid fucking point. Yeah, both are true. 10 million “progressives” handed Trump the presidency in 2024. Now, a much more concentrated group of voters elected a Democrat as mayor pf NYC. There’s no “somehow” mystery about it.

              • Arcka@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                10 million “progressives”

                Didn’t give anything to trump. You’re either assuming Harris was entitled to something she never received, or do you actually think Dementia Don convinced a lot of voters to cross the spectrum?

                • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Didn’t give anything to trump.

                  They gave Trump the country. They gave him a get-out-of-jail free card. Pathetic fucking phonies who don’t even REMOTELY give a fuck about the issues they claim to care so deeply about.

                  You’re either assuming Harris was entitled to something she never received, or do you actually think Dementia Don convinced a lot of voters to cross the spectrum?

                  Dementia Don had the same number of voters in 2020. Somehow, those 10 million fucking idiots were able to vote for Biden but Harris “didn’t deserve it”? Maybe you can explain why a convicted felon child rapist deserved it instead. Because if you refused to vote for for her, you helped him come to power. You’re a Trump supporter. Hope you’re fucking proud.

            • jve@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              One or two examples of a thing is not “proof” of anything.

              • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                OK then, so Mamdani’s win was ALSO meaningless, right? It doesn’t mean anything about a progressive push in the party?

                You see how your arguments works both ways? NYC and the state of Virginia are different places. Why are you so upset that Dems won in VA? They wouldn’t have won there running Mamdani’s campaign because the entirety Virginia is the not the municipality of NYC.

                • jve@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  OK then, so Mamdani’s win was ALSO meaningless, right?

                  No.

                  It doesn’t mean anything about a progressive push in the party?

                  Didn’t say that either. It’s not proof that the party is getting more progressive. He didn’t exactly earn their full throated endorsement.

                  You see how your arguments works both ways?

                  No. My “arguments” was that that one or two examples dont constitute a “proof” about any grander strategy being used.

                  . Why are you so upset that Dems won in VA?

                  Oh I see we’re just doing full blown straw men now.

                  In that case, it’s the same reason you are so upset about some shit that you didn’t say anything about.

                  They wouldn’t have won there running Mamdani’s campaign

                  That’s true. Virginians don’t care about free buses in New York. They’d probably have to make the campaign address Virginia.

                  because the entirety Virginia is the not the municipality of NYC.

                  Hard truths here in this post.

                  Fact is, the more progressive candidate won by 15 points. Not sure how this proves anything about what would have happened had an even more progressive candidate run.

  • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The first thing my conservative acquaintance wrote was “I hope you re ready for another 9-11” because now its coming" They are really scared eh

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yet conservatives get mad about Kirk jokes and wonder why they get kicked off platforms.

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      So in conservative brain damaged logic, Giuliani was a Muslim, Socialist Democrat somehow responsible for 9/11.

      You need better acquaintances.

      • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This was my comparable train of thought… Giuliana was elected so 9-11 could happen! He is fully responsible no? /s

      • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That would be because of photos with the Imam Siraj Wahhaj… Who according to conservatives was organizer of the 1993 wtc bombing… but was not indicted or convicted of anything related to it.

    • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair, this is a personal 9/11 for every conservative piss baby who lives in an imaginary world where every paranoid delusion they have about Mamdani is real.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        They don’t even think of New York City as “real America” in the first place. Connecting this to where 9/11 actually happened doesn’t occur to them.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because thats what adults do, they are capable of communicating and being near people with different values and opinions.

        • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          “if there’s a Nazi at the table and 10 other people sitting there talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis.”

          The “acquaintance” needs a punch in the fucking face and a goodbye.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            You do realize that having witty quotes doesnt change anything right? It might be rhetorically effective at face value, but there is no value other than hate at display here.

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not every conservative is a MAGA cultist nor a nazi, it’s ok to have friends and acquaintances with different political views and belief systems from yourself. You’re doing the “everyone I disagree with is a nazi” thing.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Not every conservative is a MAGA cultist nor a nazi,

                  Never said they were.

                  it’s ok to have friends and acquaintances with different political views and belief systems from yourself

                  Unless their beliefs say that others are lesser, or wrong, like LGBTQ people shouldn’t exist.

                  You’re doing the “everyone I disagree with is a nazi” thing.

                  Really not though, not sure how you think that is the case

        • blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Demonizing people “not like us” is exactly how we got Trump. Not every conservative is a racist monster, most of them are just confused, or heavily gaslit from years of Fox News style propaganda. I’ve personally got a few of my conservative friends and family to see the problems with Donnie Cheeto and openly rebuke his decision making. “Punching someone in the face” for making a poor choice isn’t going to do shit for us when shit gets real, changing their minds will. Not saying everyone on that side of the fence is clear, and I sure as hell hope people complicit with these horrific ice raids etc get locked the fuck up for a long time. Same with all of trumps lap dogs.

          • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nah, at this point there’s no excuses. If you’re uninformed today, it’s malicious. If you actively support a party of traitors and domestic terrorists, you’re super malicious. All nuance has been strangled and trampled down to mush about 9 years ago.

            • blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t want to live in a world where we find others with opposing views as hopeless. Anger and hate only lead to darker places. We need to hold people accountable but we should never let blind rage control our decision making.

              • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I agree with you. But how many times does a friend need to bicycle kick you in the balls before you stop calling them, and possibly call the police?

      • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You shouldn’t exclude people from your circles for different political views.

        How are you going to reach them and get some sense back into their boggled minds if you distance yourself only?