On Wednesday, a new study published in JAMA by researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle projected that by 2035, nearly half of all American adults, about 126 million individuals, will be living with obesity.

The study draws on data from more than 11 million participants via the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health and Nutrition Examination and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and from the independent Gallup Daily Survey.

The projections show a striking increase in the prevalence of obesity over the past few decades in the U.S. In 1990, only 19.3% of U.S. adults were obese, according to the study. That figure more than doubled to 42.5% by 2022, and is forecast to reach 46.9% by 2035.

  • theImpudentOne@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Incorrect. Fat shot drug is available as fat pill drug. They have or are working on children’s version. We will eat nothing and be happy. Also alcoholism will sharply decline

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      doesn’t work unless you stay on the drugs for life.

      people on GPL drugs who stop using them gain 70% of the weight back within six months.

      the issue is lifestyle. americans eat too much and don’t exercise enough. GPL drugs just make it so they eat less, but they still eat the same crap they did before so 2000 calories of hamburgers and fries (the small instead of the large). so once they go off the drug they go right back to eating 4000 calories a day.

      the issue is that you shouldn’t be eating hamburgers and fries regularly, no matter the portion. a lot americans eat a daily diet that is suppose to be sometimes foods. everyday foods should be bland and in smaller portions. asian and european diets are way more full of basic grains, veg, and lean meats.

      american food system is loaded with junk that makes you want to eat more of it. lots of processed crap, fatty meats, and added sugar/fat to everything.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Are we just using bmi because I have this friend who is a refrigerator. Short, stocky, all muscle. Bmi is something like morbid obesity back when they used the term. She had no fat weight to lose, she needed to gain fat. Or height I guess. Best clown and drummer I ever worked with.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you doubt BMI (like many of the replies I got to my other comment), you can probably ignore this study:

    Design, Setting, and Participants Analysis of measured body mass index data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and bias-corrected body mass index values calculated from self-reported height and weight data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and Gallup Daily Survey using spatiotemporal gaussian process regression and an ensemble of annualized rate of change and meta-regression bayesian spline models. Surveys for input data were conducted using population-based sampling by state and by race and ethnicity group with a total of 11 315 421 US participants.

    Main Outcomes and Measures Obesity prevalence (BMI ≥30).

    So, one reason I’m concerned about my BMI (39.5 kg/m2) is because I’m making my country look bad. Tho, with Trump at the helm, my contributions to that effort are overshadowed.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I used to be 330; I’m 5’8". I got down to 220 through diet and exercise. That’s still obese. I did 10k on the Nordictrack this morning, can run a 7 minute mile, and routinely do full-body weight lifting including 10x140 chest presses and 10x300 leg presses. I’m now up to 260, which is even worse obese.

    I don’t know how to get to a healthy BMI and I know I’m routinely failing to get there, but I’m trying.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      you work out too much.

      all that muscle needs fat to support it’s energy. you need to lose both.

      i lose weight quickly when i stop working out. both fat and muscle. also weight work increases you bone density.

      basically stop being so demanding on your body and it won’t have to ‘bulk’ so much. lighten up on the exercise.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I only do 2 days a week lifting, that’s the NIH recommendation. Granny wants to do 3, but that doesn’t currently fit into the rest of my life.

        I would do cardio every day, but things get in the way of that often, too.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          because you are working out too much. you should be working out like half of that or less.

          NIH recommends like 20m of moderate activity, a day. You are probably doing 10x that. their version of lifting weights is like 10lb dumbells and 5lb ankle weights. not full body lifting.

          it sounds like you’re training for athletic competition, not exercise. most people who exercise regularly can’t even do 10K on a nordic track, and you’re doing it in zone 2.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you want to be toned, don’t do max weight low reps, do high reps lower weight and stop trying to get stronger. I lost weight but was just getting physically bigger and not looking more muscular, only my belly and double chin went away but I stayed basically the same size. I felt a lot healthier tho, just generally good and had no issues being active at edm festivals, I quit working out and I looked skinnier after a while, but feel weaker now that it’s been two years.

      I preferred being bigger and feeling strong over now where I can fit large instead of xl but can’t be active for as long without pain. I personally only enjoy the gym when I’m going for a new max weight for every set every week. Ik logically that gaining muscle and lifting heavier should lead to more calories burned naturally and should lead to losing weight and looking less big, but id just gain muscle under my fat layer and look bigger.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not trying to get bigger. I’m following the NIH guidelines to do 1 set of 10 reps and move weight up if/when you can do 2 sets.

        I was at 10x280 on the leg press for over a year, but I noticed it getting “too easy” a few weeks ago. Bicep curls still kill my left arm, and I can only do about 60 on those.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          dude curling 60 is huge. most people can’t do 30. you’re not gonna be a small guy when you’re curling 60

          • dil@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 hours ago

            He probbaly means 60 on a bar? So like 35-40 which is normal, most dudes curl that if they goto the gym a lot and wont have arms that look big unless they flex.

  • rayyy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Low quality, high carb food is profitable. Our western diet is built around a carb diet. While approximately half the population does fairly well, weight wise, the other half does not because their bodies preferentially store carb calories as fat. That said I struggled with my weight although I was very active. Due to health issues I switched to a low carb diet more like the one I grew up with - mostly protein, high fat ( good fats like fatty fish, nuts, butter, olive oil and coconut oil), and reasonable amounts of complex carbohydrates. Weigh came off without exercise or any other effort. BTW, the calories in, the calories out approach is just plain wrong. Carbs MAKE you hungry.
    You only have one shot at this life so why would you burden yourself lugging around 50 pounds, 100 pounds or more everywhere you go.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      By what criteria are you classifying coconut oil as a good fat? The way I understand it fats going from worst to best go something like trans fat, saturated fat, unsaturated fat, omega 3. Coconut oil is nearly 100% saturated fat, moreso than butter which is around 80%. So if coconut oil is good then so is butter.

      I will say it’s somewhat marginal on the health benefits of unsaturated vs saturated though, so I will continue to use coconut oil but not sure it’s any better than other fats.

      • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Your understanding is the one I was taught throughout university but there is a competing vision where saturated fats aren’t bad. The people who talk about the evils of seed oils tend to believe this. I haven’t looked into it in a few years but there are lots of internet doctors/health influencers who can walk you through the reasoning if you are interested. I didn’t find the arguments too compelling but I’ve also been bored of extreme diets for a bit so I may be biased.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            wow. stop with this crazy talk.

            next thing you know you’ll tell me that eating a boring balanced diet that doesn’t exceed my caloric needs is how i maintain a healthy weight. because clearly that can’t be it… it has to be a secret nutritional key to unlocking weight loss.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    And that’s after US MDs successfully petitioned to re define the threshold of obesity and morbid obesity.

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      They did that in the early 2000s too. Tens of millions of people became obese over night and we suddenly had an obesity epidemic.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        uh no, they keep making the bar higher. America has an obesity epidemic because it’s fat. Most Americans don’t leave the country, but you don’t see fat sloppy people in European urban centres.

    • PMmeTrebuchets@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      On one hand, it literally is as easy as “eat less”. On the other, this is spoken like someone who’s never struggled with anything like this, and you sound like a real ass. Bc you’re right, it is as easy as “eat less”, but if that were easy, wouldn’t everyone be a healthy weight, then? Obesity wouldn’t even be a concept, if eating less was an easy thing to do.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Actually, eating less won’t work for a lot of people and you could easily end up doing more harm to your health than the obesity is doing if you push it far enough

        What you need to do is eat healthy and get regular physical activity to coax your body into metabolizing things like it should. Of course, healthy food and the space to exercise both cost money, so yeah - poverty is to social problems what boiling water is to generating energy.