The Department of Justice left multiple unredacted photos of fully nude women or girls exposed as part of Friday’s dump of more than 3.5 million pages of files related to the investigations and prosecutions of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Unlike the majority of the images in the released files, both the nudity and the faces of the people were not redacted, making them easy to identify. In some of the photos, the women or girls were either fully nude or partially undressed, posed for cameras, and exposed their genitals.
The files include more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Friday in a press conference, including “large quantities of commercial pornography and images that were seized from Epstein’s devices,” some of which were taken by Epstein, according to Blanche.
Archive: http://archive.today/2isdD


I thought they were stalling on this so they could protect the victims. Or at least that was their bullshit narrative.
This was done purposefully and to inflict pain.
Idk about to purposely inflict pain, but more because they don’t give a fuck about who they hurt, but I do agree it was on purpose. That way they can claim it’s the public’s fault for demanding these files.
Personally I believe that they were forced into it, kicking and screaming, and they wanted to make it painful. They didn’t care who got hurt, only that someone did get hurt.
They’ve got a different definition of victim, and they are doing their best (which isn’t very good, frankly, they’re very incompetent) to censor any mention of him. Or to take it down after accidentally posting it. Again, they’re very incompetent.
I don’t disagree that they’re incompetent. But in this particular case what they’re doing isn’t incompetent at all. Surely you’ve noticed that anything in there that has Trumps name next to it is all things that couldn’t be corroborated. Or things that couldn’t be followed up on for one reason it another.
They took his name off from anything that was potentially investigated and proven, and left the “she says…” statements that have had no investigative follow-up so they can say “look how honest we are. Yes he’s in there but none of it is actually provable”
Its a greasy, and slimy and frankly pure evil scheme. But its not an incompetent one.