While the New Mexico Department of Health said it can’t pinpoint the baby’s exact cause of death, officials believe it could have been linked to the mother’s drinking raw milk during pregnancy.

Health officials in New Mexico are warning against consuming raw dairy products after a newborn baby in the state died from a listeria infection that they say was likely contracted when the baby’s mother drank raw milk during pregnancy.

The New Mexico Department of Health in a news release said that officials believe the mother consumed unpasteurized milk while pregnant, which could have led to the listeria infection.

Officials cannot pinpoint the exact source of the listeria that led to the baby’s death, the release said, but it noted that “the tragic death underscores the serious risks raw dairy poses to pregnant women, young children, elderly New Mexicans and anyone with a weakened immune system.”

  • debil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Cow’s milk belongs to calves and no human being should consume dairy or products derived thereof, be it raw or pasteurized.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Pasteurization? That’s UNNATURAL! No one wants all that done to their milk. They want it RAW!

      Yea, most of these RAW milk people dont realize its basically just low temperature boiling. They think they are adding acid or antibiotics or soething.

  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    L.monocytogenes has the big issues of needing very few active colonies to cause trouble, especially to kids. It could trigger an infection so easily and across such a huge range of foodstuff and products or even basic ingredients that it’s scary.

    Now, thankfully, modern science (10000 bC ~ today) found out that heat deals with such things just fine. Especially since a guy named Pasteur understood that a mild thermic process might be enough to deactivate most patogens. Even better yet more people later on found out that high temperature can even destroy most pathogens if applied for a rational number of cicles and time. Not enough to damage the nutritional properties. Just about enough to do what the doom guy does with these demons to the pathogens and other microbes.

    Turns out drinking untreated food products is severly dangerous. When and where did this trend start.

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This seems to be another example of people not understanding the most basic exponential function.

      If you have 3% listeria… And it doubles every minute. In 5 minutes you have full-blown listeria and you’re dead…

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Her baby is dead and you want to see her in prison for murder?

      I’m pretty sure whatever lessons there are in life to learn will be better learned by the loss of a child rather than incarceration in a system that doesn’t really emphasize rehabilitation in any meaningful way.

  • madjo@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If only we had a way to remove dangerous bacteria from milk. We could name it after its inventor… /sarcasm

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      To all the people defending raw milk because it doesn’t have chemicals added: heating up milk also doesn’t have chemicals in it.

      I look forward to complaints from the raw chicken lovers.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The funny part is that some people in the raw milk community have started heating the milk before consumption to reduce the risk of illness. They swear its not pasteurization though, that’s something different and bad.

      • madjo@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can’t fix stupid, I guess. These are the same people that would fall for the “there’s chemicals in water, called DHMO!” meme.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        They swear its not pasteurization though, that’s something different and bad.

        That French, Yurrupeen socialism.

        Dying by the shits is the way God intended.

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s nice that heating milk kills bacteria and viruses; but doing it too much can damage taste and nutrition. That’s why I’ve been experimenting with ways to minimize the temperature and time needed to sanitize milk without otherwise damaging it. The deep state will never get me to drink pasturized milk!

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This isn’t survival of the fittest. Not one baby in human history was responsible for their own fitness or survival. This is survival of the poorly educated, poorly resourced, poorly connected communities. They’re trying to make ends meet with a baby, and unfortunately they couldn’t do that in a safe manner. It’s a tragedy, a hallmark of human life.

      • madjo@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The baby hadn’t been born yet. The would-be mother drank unpasteurized “raw” milk.

        That’s not a case of being poor op poorly resourced. It’s a lot harder to source unpasteurized milk than it is to find milk that is safe to drink. You have to really go out of your way to buy that!

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Actually it’s not a failure of the poorest of societies. Most the people that are these raw milk drinkers are usually people that are middle class to well off. The poorer end of the spectrum normally just purchase whatever regular milk is in the store cuz that’s usually what WIC or mom and baby or whatever else is paying for.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is survival of the poorly educated, poorly resourced, poorly connected communities.

        Or this is the “find out” moment for a MAGA housewife who spent the last year cheering on RFK Junior and yellilng about the “woke agenda” of pasteurization.

        The point is, we don’t know. But since RAW milk is both more expensive AND more inconvenient to obtain, I’m going to go with my theory over a poor mother.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Sorry, I didn’t read the “New” in the title; shame on me. Nonetheless, unless this was murder, they were poorly educated and working with propagandized information. I don’t pity them for picking the side they did. I do pity them for the circumstances that led to them believing it was the right choice when they had.

      • Thorry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Survival of the fittest doesn’t only or even usually apply to a single individual. It only applies to populations and only over a long period of time. Plus the whole thing has been debunked anyways, evolutionary pressure only works till meh good enough levels, not beyond that. It’s just a bad saying all round.

    • Klox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Personally I think we’ll continue to have problems if misinformation is never found culpable of the deaths that they cause. There’s no way this person decided to drink unpasteurized milk alone. Who was her community and why aren’t they being held accountable? I have the same concerns with the head of the HHS, and precious cases of stochastic terrorism. Our system of justice (or what it once was…) is just illprepared for this.

      • duelistsage@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, the problem is these people bond over being ignorant pieces of shit.

        It gets to the point where everyone is supposed to know the “meta” information and anyone who tries to be serious about something is ridiculed.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Google find me a website about why pasteurization is bad.

        ChatGPT explain why raw milk is good and pasteurized milk is bad.

        Imo these people are often being served what they want. The easiest things to do may be a series of truth in advertising related laws:

        A) make chatbot companies liable for anything a chatbot tells a user (regardless of disclaimers),

        B) a law that encodes similar levels of editorial process for large websites and social media power users as wikipedia: citations needed for any claim. (Note such a law would probably kill the right wing media overnight, if enforced)

        C) affiliation disclosure requirements. For both social media users and websites. Farmers selling raw milk shouldn’t also be hosting misinfo sites on pasteurization.

        And finally: D) media algorithm transparency

      • Decq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m all for going after people who purposely spread misinformation. But I don’t think this is solely on them. It’s to easy to just blame them and absolve the individual of any responsibility of critical thought. It’s not like information about pasteurized milk and the benefits isn’t readily available. But they choose to ignore it, so that’s on them too.

    • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Overall I agree. That said, I am pretty sure that you don’t have children or you would have chosen a different wording.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If only we had a way to remove dangerous bacteria from milk

      If only just heating the milk for 30 minutes could prevent these deaths. Welp, what to do.

    • dancroissant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some people are so unbelievably stupid it’s sad. On the other hand, there’s very little difference in taste/texture versus non-pasteurized milk, some people think they prefer the taste of raw milk when what they’re really enjoying is non-homogenized milk, which is still pasteurized.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    There should be much higher safety testing requiremnts for raw milk if people are going to sell it in stores. Every raw milk outlet should need to hire a microbiologist to ship it offsite.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Same, but source contol is a real method that works for this kind of thing when done well.

        Europe does source control with eggs. By very strictly monitoring sources they can prevent outbreaks and don’t need to soak eggs in a chlorine solution like we do here.

        This is probably why people apply a similar logic to pasteurization. Pasteurization is a heat process for milk and therefore far less of a problem than egg chlorination baths (which notably puts organohalides into the drainwater which may or may not degrade before going elsewhere.)

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I can’t fathom a reason why pasteurization shouldn’t be required.

        some fancy old fashioned dairy products which I cannot name need some of the microbes in raw milk to be made.

        It should be a fucking hobbyist product, and sold at specialised stores, not in fucking “tescos” or whatever the yankee equivalent is.

  • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I still think we should take the warning labels off of things and let the problem sort itself out.

    If we can thin our own herd let’s go ahead and do it.

  • lemmylump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If you’re going to listen to a fucking moron who ate road kill and got a portion of his brain EATEN BY A WORM THEN YOU DESERVE WHATEVER THE FUCK HAPPENS TO YOU OR YOUR FAMILY.

    FUCK ALL OF THESE PEOPLE!

    Sorry, an innocent child died , personally I think the parents should be prosecuted harshly.

  • j_elgato@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dying from the end result of a superstitious, anti-science, anti-intellectual outlook…

    Nature is healing?

      • j_elgato@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Well, ideally we could implement some sort of requirements for procreation.

        Unfortunately any such restrictions quickly becomes eugenics. It seems like we could find a little space between some racial purity bullshit and “Dem doctors up in that hospital are killin’ lil Cooter Jr with all dem fucking needles, injectin’ him full of the 5g microchips and the autism!”

        But, if you just dial the resolution back: it’s not their kids - their stupid is killing the whole species as well as the biosphere. Ergo, nature is healing…

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The newborn never had a chance to defy the idiocy of their parents, as many of us have.

      Antuvaxxers are in the same boat… They are vaccinated, but they are killing their children.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It will never fail to impress me how far dumberikans are willing to go to validate their own willful ignorance. Like, even killing their own kids is a price they are willing to pay to be in the cult of stupidity. Beyond belief.

    • madjo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks MAHA and all the charlatans on the internet spreading complete garbage. This was supposed to be the Enlightened Age of Information, instead it’s the Dark Ages of Misinformation.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I remember some guy from work telling me that raw milk is drinkable by the lactose intolerant.

        That’s when I knew to steer clear of talking to that guy about very much…and this was about 15 years ago.