Contents of said letter from daily beast: https://archive.is/YFBK3#selection-773.0-779.748

“Dear Jonas,” the president wrote to Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre. “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT.”

  • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Dear Santa, Considering you decided not to give me a PS5 for Christmas, even though I was a VERY good boy, I no longer feel an obligation to clean my room or not say cusses, although being good will always be predominant, but now I have to think about what is good and proper for me. Why do other kids get a PS5 anyway, and why do they have a “right” to keep them? There are no written rules, it’s just that Santa gave them one a long time ago because their parents asked nicely. But I asked nicely too, many times, and I reminded everyone constantly how nice I was. I have done more chores than any other child since chores were invented, and now Santa should do something for me. Christmas is not secure unless I have Complete and Total Control of a PS5. Thank you! Very Good Boy DJT

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    He got the FIFA peace price. He didn’t go to war with FIFA. The best president. The best. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    How are we to tell our kids to “grow up” when they’re acting immature when one of the most powerful men on the planet are acting like this publicly?

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Honestly, when folks at my job complain about Gen z work ethic, I just think…fuck man, why WOULD they. Like in old I get that I have to work to keep my community afloat based solely on principle and a desire to live in a moderately decent place but they don’t have decades of experience to teach them that. All they see is any opportunity for growth squashed more and more every day… Like why would they care? How could they motivate to even try?

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s why I have some hope for Gen Z and Alpha. They’re seeing all this and we need to tell them how things were before the billionaires truly tried to take over. Unfortunately we can’t get the Boomers to do anything because they’re too busy committing generational warfare.

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol, that letter reads like something a third grader wrote.

    “Dear Santa, since you decided to give me a Nintendo for Christmas, I no longer feel like I need to clean my room and not say bad words. I have done more chores than any other person…”

  • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    8 wars PLUS! So many after 8 we stopped counting and now we don’t even know what the number is. Thank God that peace will still be predominant, despite Donald not feeling any obligation towards it.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously though, he ought to be feeling that obligation after being awarded the Fifa Peace Prize, which is the only peace prize that matters.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    The proof is that the entire upper tier of the Executive Branch has completely lost its shit and is crewed by morons. Last time around there were adults in the room that reeled in his worst impulses even though he’d sneak a gainer in once in a while. This time? They’re a clown car stuffed with ideologues, racists, and fools with the brake pedal ripped out.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    345
    ·
    2 days ago

    dude is so pissed about not getting a peace prize hes going to war with the planet… as if to demonstrate why he would never, ever be deserving of such a prize.

    its hard to really wrap your brain around how stupid a human you would have to be to write that letter… and who is worse the clearly mentally deficient president, or the circle of sycophants enabling this bullshit?

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      183
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, it fits entirely however for anyone paying attention.

      He hated New York high society because New York high society snubbed him and wouldn’t let him in their club, because he’s a classless ass.

      He hated the US neoliberal democratic order because they snubbed him and wouldn’t let him in their club, because he doesn’t actually know what the fuck is he doing and doesn’t care about democracy.

      He vows to destroy any group or idea that would reject him. He views it as a personal affront and never feels like maybe he should be a better person.

      No, his solution is to destroy everything in his path, which is why he is also tearing apart NATO because he was snubbed by other democratic world leaders. He is such a giant fucking pussy baby bitch who can’t handle rejection at all.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 days ago

        The fact that a third of the country are exactly the same really exposes how deep the USA’s problems with mental health go.

        This last part is the scary part. Normal humans see Grandpa Klan Robe here raging out and calling for “retribution” and think - someone should take the keys away.

        Dumbass conservative apes with broken brains look at that and cheer him on and want to vote for him even harder. 1984 was all too prescient, but that’s because he was looking at quite recent events - “We’ve always been at war with [Greenland|Venezuela|Canada|Mexico]!”

      • HermitBee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I genuinely think there’s a chance that everyone is completely missing his motivation here.

        Trump turns 80 on 14th June 2026. He wants someone, be it Denmark or the US Army, to give him a country for his birthday.

        What better gift is there?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        He hated the US neoliberal democratic order because they snubbed him and wouldn’t let him in their club,

        Huh?

        He was fully in the neoliberal club…

        He got the fucking Clinton’s to come to one of his weddings, neoliberals loved him because they were one of the few people he actually wrote checks too. Because he always got a return on it.

        The shit about him not liking the Clinton’s is just WWF play acting.

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          With the bad takes again? Neoliberals will take money from anyone. Thousands of average voters donated to neoliberal causes over decades. Were they ever in the club?

          One of the few good things the neoliberals ever did, was to say no to Trump when he demanded power. The fact that Obama ridiculed him, whatever you think of Obama. Should tell you how IN he was. It’s not like everyone by that point didn’t know he was a petulant manchild. They snubbed him. Figuratively and literally. Its why he ran in 2015 against them. Petty bitterness, like all his lawsuits. He just never thought he would win.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, he’s always been mocked and derided since at least the 80s. The local press knew who and what he was for sure. Magazines like Spy mocked him all the time.

            I’m sure with his fragile snowflake ego that he has never felt fully accepted by the typical elites, especially old money. Maybe creepy pedo weirdo elites like Epstein and the freak(s) he ran his beauty pageants with at least tolerated having him around.

            The guy has always come off as thirsty AF for approval by things like Hollywood and so on, too…

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          the WWF connection is real. Trump has been a close ally of the McMahon family for decades and he was breifly involved with the show directley a couple of times . The way he runs conferences, talks to people, etc, is very similar to how things get scripted on the WWF/WWE

    • Wytch@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s always been the sycophants who are worse. Slowly, deliberately, and methodically, America has been driven half-crazy stupid by extreme right wing xenophobia and ignorance. Reactionary ideology has fully engulfed the rotten brains of America’s least introspective imbeciles. Trump is the mirror of their desperate desire to be heard, to be catered to, to be rescued from every perceived threat, real or imagined.

      We can shatter the mirror, but the monsters live among us.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I could see someone with mushbrain blurting something like that out in the moment. But imagine being such a dumbass as to set that down, in writing?

    • dovahking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can’t believe I’m watching our own world’s version of the mad king threatening a lord of a northern country, to bend the knee.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone in my family that’s defended trump tooth and nail since the first term on everythinghas done just told me they oppose what he’s doing to Greenland, and the flood of ICE agents in Minneapolis.

    I have never heard them speak a word against Trump. Not ever. And they have argued the craziest shit I’ve ever heard… Like, they think Renee was ‘asking for what she got’ levels of crazy, and that’s after they watched all the videos.

    …and they just told me they are now against Trump on these two huge events. This is nuts. I need to go but a lottery ticket or something.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      That is wild. I wonder why Greenland would be the tipping point?

      Usually conservatives practically swoon at the notion of invading and occupying things, despite all their talk about “America first”, it’s usually really Israel first, Americans dead last, and when it’s time to bomb/invade something, they are balls-deep on the cheer-leading.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 days ago

        As someone with experience with people who are in the MAGA reality bubble, this is because there is no in-canon explanation of Trump’s actions (yet, the story writers patch these up pretty quick). There was no setup for this, no laying the misinformation groundwork and no existing goal that this advances.

        Since Greenland wasn’t part of the story, it just came out of nowhere. Lacking any in-MAGA explaination, they are examining this situation as a normal person who knows normal facts and this is completely an unforced error by any measure as anyone can see.

        If this was something that was serious and planned then we would have started hearing about this months ago as they started preparing the lies and the misinformation seeding into social media via paid/artificial content creators or otherwise useful idiots. This is probably the strongest indication that Greenland is a distraction and not a real move. This is probably the case with Canada too, in my opinion.

        They would rather people talk about anything but the Epstein files and how they are very clearly covering them up and not complying with the law. They don’t want reporters to have time to report on all of the people that he has pardoned who also have made $2-5 million dollar donations to various MAGA PACs, some of them committing even more crimes and getting another pardon…

        They need to throw things into the air to distract people. Some of their planned events are polling negative (the Minnesota Invasion, Healthcare Subsidies) and they don’t have anything else so instead we get more random tariffs and more random military threats because they are something that the Executive Branch can do unilaterally and suddenly to ensure that they grab the next news cycle.

        This is the “Flood the Zone” tactic that Steve Bannon said that they were using during the first admin.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          If this was something that was serious and planned then we would have started hearing about this months ago as they started preparing the lies and the misinformation seeding into social media via paid/artificial content creators or otherwise useful idiots. This is probably the strongest indication that Greenland is a distraction and not a real move. This is probably the case with Canada too, in my opinion.

          He did start babbling about it early in his second failed term. And I did see attempts to sanewash this talk about Greenland in places like The Atlantic, for example.

          But yeah, the messaging on this has been extremely scattershot.

          • MBech@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            He talked about buying Greenland as early as his first term. Don’t know if it was major news in USA, but here in Denmark it was pretty big news, mostly because it would literally not make any sense for anyone to sell Greenland. Might as well buy it from Azerbaijan as you might buy it from Denmark.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not enough challenge. We “liberate” “armed” countries from their “oppressors” and go into the very bad places and make things “better”

        We’re now raiding Sunny Side Daycare. There’s no fairytale there.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because Greenland is full of white people. If it were full of brown people, especially if they immigrate to the US frequently enough and “steal our jobs”, we might be hearing a different tune.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Conservatives seem to oscillate between isolationism and aggressive intervention. They’re both from the stance of American primacy, either using our military for our benefit and to enforce our wishes or saying the world has nothing to offer us we need and that we’re better off not extending effort or energy on the rest of the world.

        Currently our conservatives are swinging towards isolationism, which is why the anti immigration rhetoric and pulling out of international organizations was very popular. That’s not compatible with a plan to forcibly annex another country.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    everyone is shocked I tell you SHOCKED! now what the fuck is going to be done about it? Is he just going to be allowed to steamroll and conquer neighboring countries forever while the news keeps saying “surely this is the last straw”? Why don’t other countries cut off the Untied States financially until it behaves?

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because they can’t. It well hurt they’re GDP and citizens. No more phones no more laptops. The world is to reliant on the US and it’s companies.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        No more phones no more laptops.

        The only thing it would truly affect is Apple; Samsung could offer de-googled phones in the blink of an eye.

        Hell, we don’t even make the cellphones or laptops here. China has its own stuff. If a single one of the hardware manufacturers dedicated a couple of months to an open source driver project, we could have Linux phones by EOY.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          A lot of the technology inside a phone is still dependent on US patents and/or manufactured parts. It may seem like one country makes this or that, but that’s not actually how it works. If you look online you’ll see the lowest number is around 40 countries for an iPhone.

          • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I feel like if the US can ignore the sovereignty of Denmark, the founding principles of NATO and pretty much the entirety of international law, the rest of us shouldn’t really stress too much about US patents TBH.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            US patents and/or manufactured parts

            US what now? We’re not making any parts. We are, at best, assembling some things; Tealistically, we’re just fucking boxing shit these days. And patents? Once you’re in an actual trade war, who in the hell cares about a country’s IP claims?

            You can get a black market iphone in China, not once piece has to pass through the US, the tricky part is getting the apple store and apps if they decide to blacklist your serial number.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dunno, I was pretty embarrassed by Dubya, as well, so it feels like its been almost a solid two and a half decades of embarrassment.

        Dubya and his middle east clusterfuck is when other nations started questioning US stability and relations but was considered an anomaly.

        Trump turned the anomaly into a certainty.

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What about non dubya. What about Reagan. Ford? Nixon… Its been a roughly embarrassing century. Longer actually. But at least a century.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean, I don’t disagree, but Reagan and Ford didn’t necessarily make Europe especially distrustful of the USA. Reagan made South America distrustful of the USA, but the USA weren’t specifically allied with many South American nations other than through imperial dominance anyway.

            The USA was mostly considered stable and relatively trustworthy, even with Reagan in charge. Dubya was when Europe really started questioning US long-term stability and trustworthiness as an economic partner and NATO partner.

            • Eldritch@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s a very narrow distinction, but I’ll give you that. Though it was Reagan that sold arms to the middle east and Iran. Perhaps they didn’t think the US would fall under him. But they certainly knew he wasn’t a dependable or upstanding person.

              Trump is very mask off in a way that many of those sociopath’s weren’t. Mostly because he’s incapable of masking.

            • B-TR3E@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Being European and old enough to remember, I’d say Reagan was not exactly popular in Europe. His “In five minutes we’ll start bombing” joke -in Berlin of all places in the world- didn’t go down very well in West Germany which used to be far on the pro-American side.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Really? This is what does it.

    Not all his other deranged bullshit – this?

    Fine, I’ll take it, but you’d better be fucking serious, US, or your own credibility is gone.

    Do something about it! Now!

  • Rhoeri@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 days ago

    His legacy will be that of the most embarrassing thing to ever happen to America. No joke- This “man” will die being remembered as a cowardly little moron that threw temper tantrums when he didn’t get what he never deserved in the first place.

    • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      2 days ago

      20 years ago, many of us thought George W. Bush’s legacy would be that he was the most embarrassing president to ever happen to America…

      Never forget that Trump is the most embarrassing president that we’ve ever had yet…

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        And prior to that, we had Ronnie Raygun. W was embarrassing on a lot of levels, but Ronnie Raygun had the most criminal administration in history (at least so far) and the things they did set us on the path we are still on…

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Watching Futurama and hearing them say that Nixon was the worst president in history AND alternate history is hard to watch now. The writers get a lot of things right, but Trump completely breaks that joke in a heartbreaking way.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            My guess is that it had something to do with the age of the writers? Nixon really broke the mold, I guess.

            A lot of things happened in the 60s and 70s that broke a lot of cherished myths of post-war America. Seeing JFK and RFK getting assassinated. MLK getting assassinated. Pentagon Papers. An incredibly painful economy. Oil embargoes. Then Nixon and Watergate…then the Church Committee. I’m assuming if they were to do a word association, they’d probably associate Nixon with all or most of this stuff. It definitely made an impression on the boomer mindset.

            But Ronnie Raygun was far worse than Nixon. I think at that point, the boomers (and their parents) were just sick of all the bad news and conservative corruption and mostly tuned it out. The media mostly turned away entirely from the Iran/Contra affair.

            And of course Bush Senior and W were not exactly great.

            And now there’s Taco…

            • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you ever try to tell someone the publicly released undisputed facts of the Iran-Contra affair, you will come across like a conspiracy nut because what happened is so utterly absurdly criminal and yet there were virtually no consequences for anyone involved. One fall guy went to jail for a while and then came out as a Fox News correspondent.

              “The famously conservative president of the United States illegally sold weapons to a radical Islamist terrorist organization in Iran (the US’s mortal enemy in the middle east) and then used the proceeds to fund Central American guerrilla fighters that were also narcoterrorists? And nothing much ever came of it? Hah, as if!”

              • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Yeah. I mean I understand that for a very large population - the boomers - the Watergate thing was extremely formative for the time. But when someone tries to tell me that Iran/Contra was not as bad as Watergate? I just don’t get that. It’s just like what you say - it sounds like some wild-eyed black helicopter thing when you read it out loud. It also reads like a rather salacious Hollywood plot when you add in that Ollie North, decades later - in 2025 - married the secretary (Fawn Hall) that helped him shred documents…Fawn Hall also dated Rob Lowe because he saw her in the trial…and she was offered lots of money to pose nude.

                Ever since Watergate, a -gate is added to every scandal, even after Iran/Contra, even though Iran/Contra seems remarkably worse. I guess at that point, the boomers and the Silent Generation were jaded and had PTSD by so many things that came before, but…wow. Also, Gen X is a much smaller set of people, so their opinion on it or impressions didn’t really matter, and Gen Y was much too young or not born.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean Trump, W, Raygun, Nixon…

          Everyone says “caretaker president” perjoratively, but I’m starting to wonder if the presidents who do the least are the best.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Bush the I went to war for oil. No “WMD” bullshit cover story even. Just “we need that oil for profits, go send your children to die”. I stupidly thought that would wake people up.

          Ai yi yi.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well, if they weren’t going to wake up after Iran/Contra…or the allegations that Ronnie Raygun worked to purposefully fuck up the release of the Iran hostages [1] so that he could do it during his Inauguration…but no.

            They elected Bush Senior into office even though he was VP in the most criminal administration in history. I guess people could tell themselves that he somehow knew nothing about all the crimes, but…

            [1] https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a43368900/reagan-iran-hostages/

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      The irony is that he was the President that followed an incredibly accomplished, intelligent, and thoughtful man. I disagreed with Obama on a lot, from policy to style, but there was no doubt that he had great charisma and intelligence. To be followed by that shit show TWICE must hurt.

      • Rhoeri@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Absolutely. Obama is a diplomat. And well learned. It’s like following a TED talk with The Three Stooges.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s also the legacy of all the Congress members and Senators for not impeaching him or invoking the 25th Amendment

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Impeachment has to start in committee, it isn’t just a bunch of them chanting.

        Not that I disagree with the fundamental premise, just - y’know, you can’t vote for something that doesn’t exist. Kind of like a viable third party.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I don’t see how you can be a serious person and not find this extremely worrisome,” wrote Sen. Brian SchatSchatz (D-HI) in a social media post on X Monday. “He is not stable at all and his reality is warped. He was always a bit like this of course but now he’s [79].”

    As the oldest sitting U.S. president in history, Trump has increasingly shown signs of aging, both physically and mentally, multiple outlets have reported. And, with his recent letter – the authenticity of which was questioned by critics due to its “jaw-dropping” content and “unhinged crazy talk” – speculation as to the president’s mental well-being only grew louder.

    This is fucked up journalism inside the fucked up story that is super fucked up. Look at this - in the first quote they replace whatever word he used with [79]. Why? Presumably the original word was “old” and they wanted to reinforce the 79 as that has become shorthand for dementia, since the press has decided they can’t say anything due to their billionaire owners telling them they can’t say anything about it.

    But what if it was “super fucked up”? That’d have been a way better quote.

    And the constant referring to Xitter is awful, and the “shows signs of [decline] multiple outlets have reported” as if they’re not allowed to say it, as if it’s not as obvious as the nose on one’s face. They won’t take the burden of saying it, they’ll refer you to other corporate propaganda rags that have meekly implied it for them.

    SAD!

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is fucked up journalism inside the fucked up story that is super fucked up. Look at this - in the first quote they replace whatever word he used with [79]. Why? Presumably the original word was “old” and they wanted to reinforce the 79 as that has become shorthand for dementia, since the press has decided they can’t say anything due to their billionaire owners telling them they can’t say anything about it.

      Am I missing something? If you actually click the link to the tweet you’d have seen that Brian Schatz said, and I quote directly: “I don’t see how you can be a serious person and not find this extremely worrisome. He is not stable at all and his reality is warped. He was always a bit like this of course but now he’s 80.”. There is no replacement of the word “old” or anything like that, at the very least it was a minor correction.

      And if that is the case, saying “old” instead of “79” or “80” would have been way less damning in my opinion. Maybe I’m too young for this shit but “old” for me is 55+. Not fucking retirement age, AKA 67+ where I live, let alone 79 or 80 years old.

      I truly don’t know what to make of this comment. Yeah trump is a shithead and I truly am sad that he still isn’t 6 feet deep, but what are you trying to achieve with this comment? It just seems like ragebait aimed at journalist or something, I really, truly, don’t know.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Journalists are scared pansies. What a joke of a field. If you’re a journalist, you should be ashamed and ridiculed. In a time where so many people wish they could do more to stop fascism or stand against it, the people that have power would rather suck boots and protect pedos.

      • archiboldtheseed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey now. 128 journalists were killed and 503 detained in 2025. There are journalists out there risking their lives to deliver the truth. They’re just getting rarer because fascists keep murdering them.