• notptr@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    很漂亮 Much better than mine. You can see an example of my handwriting in my post history.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Very neat, though it looks like you’re afraid of ascenders and decenders. your f’s look cut off at the top, your h’s looks a little like n’s, etc. Looks like you’re trying to stick to a rule from a different alphabet that everything is the same height; the Latin alphabet doesn’t work like that.

  • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Decently readable, though some of the letter forms you’ve chosen could be confused for others (‘a’ is quite similar to ‘o’, ‘f’ could be confused for ‘t’). When I’m lettering for engineering/math I use engineering gothic letterforms which avoid these ambiguities, among others (I vs l vs ι vs 1 vs 7, a vs α vs o vs ο, O vs 0, q vs g, k vs κ, v vs ν, u vs μ, B vs 8). When I’m handwriting I just write chickenscratch unreadable to anyone else including my future self after a year or so.

  • Soulg@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Far far better than my handwriting has ever been

    You want the top of ‘f’ to curve more, as well as the bottom of ‘g’. Very readable

  • MasterNerd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Much better than my own handwriting. The only real feedback I have is to continue the curve on the top of the lowercase f a little longer

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It is very neat and pretty although the two ideograms for “author” seem different.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    h, l, f and t could all be a bit taller. Same for the line downwards from p.

  • SethranKada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s pretty good, easier to read than most native speakers I’d say.

    If I had to give a critique, I’d say the letters are rather round, so it can be hard to tell an ‘a’ from an ‘o’, but most people develop quirks like that in English so it’s perfectly fine.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Better than mine lol

    Really, all you need to do is make sure you’re fully closing the circular parts of the letters. Maybe make the tail on your “a” longer.

  • chocrates@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Firstly, your penmanship is great, better than mine as a native tech worker.

    For some actual feedback, your letter sizes for the same letters are a bit inconsistent. That just takes practice.

    You are writing at a bit of a slant. That is not wrong but not that common, at least in the states.

    You are trying to stay within the lines and that is causing you to change the shape of the letters if they are too large.

    Your f’s could use a bit more curve. They look a little close to a t.

    But seriously it looks great.

    • Sprinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The slant in print writing I think stems from how curisve is (was?) taught in U.S elementary schools. I recall getting the very distinct advice to tilt my paper 45° for cursive writing and it ended up becoming a habit that carried over into my print writing.

      • chocrates@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Definitely I was taught to do it for cursive. My school system abandoned cursive after we learned it so I never got in that habit I guess

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looks good, just need to work on a few minor things:

    All of the ascenders and descenders (lines that extend above and below) need to be longer, especially on the f, d and the p. Also make sure the line on the right side of the a is clear and noticeable, it looks a lot like an o because you can hardly see that line. Overall the round parts of letters like a, d, g, p, etc are a little too wide/fat, so that combined with the vertical line parts being too short makes them look too similar to an o.

    That may sound like a lot of criticism, but overall it does look very good. It just takes a lot of words to try and describe these small issues.