• extremeboredom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fascist/authoritarian scum the world over are TERRIFIED of the concept of regular human beings having the ability to communicate with each other without being censored, coerced, and surveilled. This is a nightmare scenario for them: people speaking freely

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s also worth mentioning that the bandwidth requirements of actual, honest, information and news, are appallingly low. The level of slop and waste in our current social media landscape is in no way representative of what it takes to communicate effectively.

      100 years ago we used to get the word out to broadcasters at 100 baud over teletype.

      So, imagine a network that uses less than 1% of the bandwidth we currently use. It’s a pocket-sized situation that almost disappears into the noise of everything else, yet is free, accessible, and effective. Radio and mesh networks are absolutely up to the task, even if they have to be covert and/or mobile.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Right, this doesn’t get enough attention. Either weirdly or completely understandable. Especially since the Egyptian uprising I think scared a lot of governments.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Make no mistake. The Arab Spring also taught governments around the world that “shut off the internet” is a crucial element in crushing mass dissent.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      agree on uncensorable but keep in mind ham radio is antiprivate by design - every time you say your callsign you sign off

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          1 day ago

          you’re also a shining beacon every second you transmit and even states with moderate capabilities record their radio spectrum 24/7 even during peacetime

          • perestroika@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ve seen tests where a reasonably equipped military vehicle could not detect a drone in the air near them, because the drone was roving through a band of several gigahertz at a thousand hops per second.

            • fullsquare@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              yes i know how spread spectrum schemes work, but this is not really practical or relevant here

              for spread spectrum things to work you need some wide bandwidth, this works great for microwaves where you can spread your 90GHz band signal so that it covers 5GHz, you can’t have a signal centered on 5MHz that is 5GHz wide; HF is relevant because while microwaves work with this microwaves are line of sight only and most people’s line of sight still terminates in their own country. if you live on a lone hill next to border good for you, but the rest would need to use HF to get out, and there’s simply not that much bandwidth available in the first place, which would make any scheme like this extremely slow if at all viable. and you can still jam it

              i don’t assume that satellite repeaters would be a viable option because satellite, or any other receiving party for that matter, would need to be aware of modulation scheme to receive it in the first place, so it only works if your international contacts are pre-arranged, and even then you need radio that has much larger bandwidth that is usually available. yapping on LSB or narrow digimodes will get you heard within continental range, but also it will get you noticed, but if you hide from your adversary you also hide from everyone else not in the know. and even then, you can still get noticed, because it’s under noise level only at some distance from you

              also some of these schemes require precise time to be known, and if you have gps jammed you’ll get extra problems from that

              • perestroika@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Thanks for contructive criticism. :)

                A compact antenna for long bandwidth: wind a spiral. For 40 meters, you could could make a spiral of 1.6 m outer diameter (“a bit less than average human height”), 10 cm inner diameter and 15 turns of wire (if I used the calculator correctly). Not a terribly efficient antenna, but a very compact one for given wavelength.

                Exaples:

                https://sergeev.io/projects/spiral-dipole/

                https://www.avalonarc.org.uk/2019/10-27-an-80m-spiral-loop.html

                I have heard (myself I don’t use HF) that HF radios work tolerably with an antenna horizontally on a car roof (could be a truck bed). But it’s true that there is little bandwidth on such frequencies. As for throughput: a channel that is 9 KHz wide is supposed to transfer 9.6 kbit / s of with military data radios (with ionosphere reflection, despite all the multipathing that it causes - I have not checked, but recall a scientific paper telling so). A reasonable detection avoidance technique might be broadcasting from a depressed location or an urban canyon with tall ground clutter. You’d want the direction finder to chase reflections.

                Even more fun scenarios exist: launch your guerilla transmitter on a free flight balloon, and will have plentiful line of sight. Essentially a pseudosatellite.

                • fullsquare@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  this is just a really extravagant heater, physics forbids antenna this small to have good radiation resistance. for your contrived below noise communications scheme, you need more bandwidth that is physically possible on hf, yet you choose antenna design that is even less wideband than regular dipole. 40m of wire is for 80m band, which is usable more often in this configuration, ignoring everything else

                  As for throughput: a channel that is 9 KHz wide is supposed to transfer 9.6 kbit / s

                  5500kbps in extremely favourable conditions is your peak attainable speed, bandwiths in normal radios are narrower

                  A reasonable detection avoidance technique might be broadcasting from a depressed location or an urban canyon with tall ground clutter

                  if you don’t want anyone to hear you

                  launch your guerilla transmitter on a free flight balloon, and will have plentiful line of sight.

                  with what power source? better study for and get your license, start using radio and stop embarrassing yourself

                • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  It is a thousand times more easy to send a secure electronic message then to broadcast an untraceable radio transmission to someone if any physical distance.

                  Any government they is locking down electronic communication that effectively would fine your radio based solution trivial to intercept and trace.

          • perestroika@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            …broadcast it upwards with a reasonably directional antenna, reflecting off the ionosphere. …broadcast it from a solar powered relay station which you access via optical link.

            (no a ham radio operator, but an anarchist)

            I feel sad for the Belarusian ham radio operators, however. In case of crisis, they would be the people who could help develop something interesting to help others. I guess KGB (they still have it) has decided that nothing interesting is needed in their land. :(

            • fullsquare@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              you super stealthy nvis signal might not be noticed by anyone, including intended recipient, but your antenna farm made form 40m long wires certainly will

            • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You don’t seen to understand what the word “broadcast” means and you should probably stop pretending to understand how radio transmission works.

              • perestroika@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yes, let’s nitpick words. Broadcast implies that something is available to others. An ionosphere reflection definitely is. An agile frequency hopping signal conditionally is - if they know a key. Which would arguably make it unicast.

                and you should probably stop pretending to understand how radio transmission works

                Oh higness, thou areth much holier than me. I am humbled.

                • Mowcherie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  New ideas and methods are going to be what people need to combat these crackdowns. Posing new thoughts is what people have to start attempting, even at the risk of ridicule. Not every innovative idea is a winner, but eventually a new method will solve the problem. Everyone should keep thinking about how to acheive untracible HAM radio.

              • northface@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Yes, and immediately become subject for closer surveillance by doing so.

                My take, as mentioned in another reply: Retain plausible deniability by communicating in plain sight and use good old codebooks or similar techniques for the secret parts of your messages.

              • m0darn@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah sorry I meant like from different places in a city, not just not at home.

                It’s for sure rude and not something I’d try/recommend but we’re talking about espionage here.

                Am I wrong in thinking that if I wanted to propagate revolutionary thought and went to a different neighbourhood with an HT and transmitted to the local repeater, it would be hard for the state to find me if my transmission was less than 5 minutes?

                • halfsak@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It just takes 3 or more synchronized receive stations to pinpoint your location. The state has an unlimited budget compared to you.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    My ex’s dad was a ham radio guy but this seems excessive.

    I should start making some meshtastic/meshcore devices…

    • Mike D@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I got my Meshtastic node running tonight for the first time. I expected to be out of range because I have line-of-site to very little. My node currently shows 160 other nodes online. Woohoo!

      Already looking at another client for Meshcore.

        • Mike D@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Basic external antenna. Sitting on my desk with all my computer stuff.

          I thought I’d have to climb on the roof to see another node.

          Bought two haltec v3 last night so I can also try meshcore.

    • cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I got into MeshCore after Benn Jordan mentioned it in a recent video. Turns out there’s already a network spanning hundreds of kilometers in my area. I’m making a couple companion nodes so I can communicate with my partner, who lives an hour away, in the event of an emergency where there’s no power or internet. Also making some solar repeaters to improve coverage in my area.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      My grandfather was a Ham guy, amongst a great many other brilliant things.

      One of many things I wish he’d have lived long enough for me to experience with him.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m seeing a suspicious lack of Belarusians shooting Lukashenko. Guess they deserve it!

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I can’t condone the further division of people with this kind of speech, but damn it if it doesn’t prove the point.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Surely Trump will swoop in and prove he doesn’t tolerate authoritarians murdering civilians outside of the U.S. in an attempt to suppress their free speech.

      Bc if he does, he’s supposed to add it to the official good guyz list of exceptions along with Saudi Arabia and all the other benevolent murderous dictators. Otherwise shit just gets way too confusing.