• Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Logseq is better than obsidian and it’s not even at version 1 yet

    • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I was so impressed by logseq……until I realized my files are all managed in a database. Obsidian just saves your notes as basic markdown files. That ended up being a big enough reason to go back.

      If that’s not a big deal to you, absolutely logseq 100%.

      • bazzett@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Same. I don’t like Joplin for the same reason. I mean, the encryption feature is super good and all, but if I can’t edit my notes in any app I want whenever I want, then it’s a no-go for me.

        • GentlePulpy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can export all your already enctypted notes to the plain markdown files without encryption, so Joplin can be very easy switched to another app

      • eta@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It was the same for me. I stopped looking at Logseq the second I saw that it didn’t simply save text files. It shouldn’t really be an issue since Logseq is open source so you won’t lose access to your files but for notes I like the simplicity of plain text files for backup in git, for sharing and for searchability.

        • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yep same reason here. I use git for backup and sync, if my notes are in a db I can’t easily do that.

          In addition to those benefits, I’d like for my information to outlive the tool I’m using to manage it, which is less likely when using something db-centric.