of course, only shitty AI is allowed to do that

what movie?

Terminator? no, our level of AI is ridiculously far from that

The Big Short? yes, that bubble is going to pop and bring the world economy down

a few months?.. Mieli burned through a similar amount in like 3 days a few weeks ago

it’s not that type of channel… they never do more than a percentage or a rate.

their thing is to explain concepts in a way a young audience can digest them

exactly, also explainedein the vid

because it’s Friday?

auto correct strikes again

almost literally anything but hitting sitting back down

That’s really more like a 15 year window because I remember the 90’s and early 00’s and by today’s standards, people were racist as shit and it was considered acceptable.

Well, the Mango Mussolini nightmare started 10 years ago or so… so not too far off

Dude, the difference is the scale… back then they could hint at it, if they overdid it, that was a career ending mistake

Now all safeties are off… they literally compete to see who says they worst racist shit

Oh yes… when racist pieces of shit noticed it was OK to air their BS and wear it proudly after Republicans send the message that this is OK now… they feed off each other

I assumed they don’t do their research using random crap on “the internet”, but reliable experts, peer reviewed papers and such

Yes, that is what they claim. But I am sure you have seen how hard it is now to find something even if you know exactly what you are looking for. It’s not like there are 2 libraries online for anything you need, right? You start researching about topic A and read that Dr XYZ did a study on this so you look for that study… just to find out Dr XYZ does not and has never existed.

No specific claims about topics, funding, time or anything. And again, no numbers, so hard to argue objectively.

So you want a specific number as to how many bad sources they are now forcing to discard because they turned out to be AI slop?

well, it may be a matter of context and tolerance here but I find the concept they are presenting is axiomatic and as such would not require any further explanation:

They use the internet to research their videos… the internet is getting more and more polluted with false narratives… ergo, it is becoming harder to research for their videos. Without good source, there are no videos.

If I tell you plants need water to exist but each season brings less and less rain year after year… would you say a title such as “drought is killing the plants” clickbaity?

Snap out of the Apple reality distortion field… and stop believing this company somehow is not like all others: just a psychopathic entity with insatiable greed

which is completely devoid of logic… by that standard, their maps app is telling me were all the “insert thing some crazy people hate here” and therefore putting them at risk of harm

Don’t like bakeries?.. find where they are on Apple maps

Don’t like comic book shops?.. find where they are on Apple maps

Don’t like hair salons?.. find where they are on Apple maps

I hope Apple Fanbois finally snap out of it with this one… but I doubt it

What would prevent Lemmy from becoming another Reddit

You’d need to convince every one hosting a Lemmy instance (and all possible future ones) to sell their platform for money or blackmail them into submission…

With Reddit, they only needed to convince Spez which is like convincing an alcoholic to have a free shot of his fav poison

The video gives an elaborate description on their evaluation of “AI” and it’s influence on the Internet at large. And then they conclude with “we’ll continue like before” directly contradicting the title.

You missed the entire point of the video.

The claims are simple:

• in order to make this type of videos, they need to be able to reliable fact check

• data on the internet is increasingly polluted by AI slop, making it harder to distinguish fact from slop

• for now, they have no choice but to continue while being extra vigilant… but eventually, if things do not change, they will be unable to perform

It’s the exact same situation about climate change… we need to act now, most of us will suffer otherwise but for now we continue on living while trying to adjust where we can (recycling, reusing, less/no meat, etc) even if we know that will not be enough long term.

I left when they started charging more so they wouldn’t ruin your service with ads… which they did anyway

She is 100% right and it’s incredible you describe this in detail about yourself but fail to internalize it.

The spark just tends to fade for me, and I don’t believe in staying in a situation where I’m bored or unfulfilled, so I end things.

Maybe after this happened to you TWICE you should have known you are not a person that can sustain a long term relationship and thus you shouldn’t… there are plenty of people out there who’d be happy with more casual, no-strings-attached, relationships, you included!

You are basically shopping for pants after repeatedly getting tired of pants and scissor them into shorts… then asking “someone said I may not like pants, what’s up with that!!!”