• overat8@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not sure if this still works but, the YouTube version I had, mobile YouTube vanced, there’s a loophole to bypass the “premium 2x speed”. It basically getting to video settings as quickly as possible.

    These steps work on the YouTube vanced app on android. I don’t know what versions you’re on so it may not work.

    When you open a video immediately open the video settings then click your playback settings, then select the 2x speed. On android, YouTube video buffer briefly before loading up at the very beginning, and if you successfully manage to click the playback settings it should load the old YouTube playback settings where the it listed the different speed in a column. If not, as in you were too slow to open the video settings, you can always try again. You just have to close the video and open it again using YouTube history, and again try getting to the video playback settings asap.

    • apftwb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I am not one for fear the terminal, but do people actually use this to browse YT? What does this workflow look like? Searching video URLs, manually copying them into this cli, and then opening the downloaded file?

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        No, it isn’t useful to browse.

        I use it for grabbing low quality music and ‘subscribing’ to various channels (checks and downloads new videos every 10m) in order to avoid having to give the algorithm my eyeballs.

        If you just want to scroll, something like FreeTube would do what you want. It blocks ads and has sponsorblock built-in. You can subscribe to videos via the app (which is all stored locally, not in any account, you don’t have to log-in.)

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I can barely follow and absorb anything at 1.5-2x.

    Beyond that, more power to you.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      For me personally, until a month ago I had no idea why people would prefer to watch at faster speed.

      Then I was assigned 10 hours of training at work, and it was all the worst fucking videos you’ve ever seen, no editing for clarity or brevity, points being repeated at nausea. Repeated footage. And it’s not like I could skip vast portions of it, I never knew when a little piece of key information would be snuck in which was in the knowledge test.

      Finally said to myself fuck this and I put it on 2x. I found it kind of life-changing in that moment and I’m going to consider using faster watch speeds from now on.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Ive experienced that too :) These companies that make training videos for employees, seems like anyone could succeed there. Literally no quality, but thats fine, the manager gets his checkbox checked, all employees trained.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Not OP but informational podcast/interview type videos that are heavy on talking and long I watch at 2.25x with subtitles on.

      • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Interesting, I do 1.5x for certain podcasts and tabletop like Critical Role, but even at that speed I miss things and lose comprehension (although I am usually multitasking as well)

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Makes sense, in other contexts I’d watch at lower speeds (I watch starcraft games sometimes at 1.25x), but for me this is kind of like the video equivalent of skimming an article, actively reading and listening at the same time and not multitasking. I also manually skip around to get to relevant information faster.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I am at the point where you tube is now a rare choice. I am tired of the stupid games and adblock and trying to not log in.

    Fuck it, I can do without.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Lol nope, out of principle I will never pay for this even if I didn’t already hate Google.

    It feels so condescending to the user, so unconcerned with their agency that I could never bring myself to support this choice with even a tiny amount of money.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      100% agree. The problem is that there are more and more features that get tugged behind the subscription paywall

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Same here. I’m sick of seeing people say stuff like “just pay for Premium bro”. Stfu. That’s like paying the mafia for “protection” from them. YouTube created these problems and now I have to pay them to fix it? Fuck no.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 hours ago

    You can use yt-dlp to download it and play it in whatever movie player you want that supports variable speeds, unless and until YouTube cracks down on downloading.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I use jdownloader2. I think it uses yt-dl on the backend though? Like the original yt-dl. I’m not sure.

      I was curious so I downloaded the Mac version of yt-dlp (as I am on Mac), couldn’t get it to run. And I’m comfortable with the command line.

      YouTube kinda is cracking down on downloading though. If a video is marked as adult (you need to sign in to view it), it can’t be downloaded. A lot of “official videos” (like trailers from the studio) can’t be downloaded. Subtitles can’t be downloaded. That’s in jd2. Not sure about yt-dlp.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think it uses yt-dl on the backend though? Like the original yt-dl.

        You’re probably thinking of youtube-dl. I’d guess that it most-likely used that at one point, but probably switched to yt-dlp when YouTube started throttling single-stream downloads.