Over the weekend, Epstein survivors demanded that additional documents be released, accusing the Trump administration of concealing more than 3 million files

A Republican senator has changed her mind about the Epstein files after reviewing unredacted documents associated with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Wyoming Sen. Cynthia Lummis recently reviewed a handful of documents from the Epstein files without redactions, saying in an interview afterward that she now understands “what the big deal is."

Lummis, 71, told Capitol Hill reporter Pablo Manriquez on Monday, Feb. 9, that while she previously had said, “I don’t care” about Congress’ efforts to force the release of Epstein evidence, she now believes the issue was “worth investigating.”

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      More like she had to admit a thing she was conveniently for her career ignoring. She is a nihlist, believing in nothing. There was no conscience at work here, no appeal to justice. Just a cold calculation of positions.

        • human@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          13 hours ago

          But in this case the sex is between one consenting adult and an underage girl, so they are fine with that.

          Ironically if it was just the one adult by himself that would be a no no.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Tbh they just didn’t stop the evangelicals from that shit. Way way back in they day they were cooler about that. But then. Jeezus.

          Then they saw its use as a weapon.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Because as long as they haven’t seen the files they can make themselves believe that maybe the whole Epstein affair is speculation and grossly exaggerated and that they can’t possibly be that bad. When they finally see the truth they can no longer make those mental gymnastics. It also helps that they also likely realize that the truth will get out sooner or later and don’t want to be among the ones who protected those monsters.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It also helps that they also likely realize that the truth will get out sooner or later and don’t want to be among the ones who protected those monsters.

        It’s about a decade late for that.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      She probably saw a Democrat in the list and wants to win the next election.

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s like the difference between someone who enjoys R18 content, and someone who enjoys R-18G content.

      A victim subjected to R-18 activities will no doubt be subjected to what you stated. A victim subjected to R-18G activities will probably need their body to be hidden somewhere when the session is over.

      The GOPper in question was likely most displeased when she misplaced the contents of her breakfast upon seeing several pictures of R-18G activities.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s nice but it means nothing if she doesn’t do something about it. Release the files and impeach Trump. Anything less is just putting on a show to try to sway voters for the midterms.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lummis, 71, told Capitol Hill reporter Pablo Manriquez on Monday, Feb. 9, that while she previously had said, “I don’t care” about Congress’ efforts to force the release of Epstein evidence, she now believes the issue was “worth investigating.”

    The cynic in me thinks she ignored pages and pages of trump named referenced crimes and saw Clinton’s name at least once, so now she’s wants to make political hay only against Clinton.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I feel like the words “I don’t care” should ever escape a politician’s mouth. Their entire job is to care. Why are they representing us if they don’t?

  • KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Amazing how they all grow spines after announcing that they’re not running for reelection.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s almost like the only reason they vote like pieces of shit is because their party. They hold no values of their own while they’re in office, and don’t vote based on what their constituents want. It’s solely what the party tells them to do.

  • digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It is probably effecting the voting numbers for her and therefore she needs to pretend again to get the sweet sweet suckers to vote for her again come next cycle.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It is probably effecting [sic] the voting numbers for her

      Dude, she’s a senator from Wyoming who isn’t running for reelection in 2026. Did you even check before you speculated about this?

      • digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Aah, so a peaceful retirement where she can say she changed her mind so the people with pitchforks and torches don’t camp out the residence.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Okay, so you’re just going to make up literally whatever feels right to you regardless of evidence – and I say this as someone who, unlike you, knows anything at all about Cynthia Lumis and therefore has the capacity to hate her for the terrible things she’s done.

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Okay, in more polite terms: it’s fine to be uninformed, and it’s fine to be wrong. What’s not fine is to be confidently incorrect on a subject you know nothing about, get shown that you have zero idea what you’re talking about, and then (the wrong part) instead of reflecting on that and trying to learn more so you can develop an informed opinion, just kneejerk pivot to whatever idea pops into your head next.

              For you, that’s the quickest way to never learn anything, and for the people around you, it’s just polluting the discussion with uninformed, unsubstantiated noise.

              • digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                I don’t know you’re right.

                Have the wonderful day you want and please don’t give me another thought. Take care love.

                • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  I don’t know you’re right.

                  I’m not making a claim about her motives in that comment. I’m saying that this commenter is just making shit up that sounds true to them, evidenced by the comment about an alleged contentious vote in a solid Republican state in an election she’s not even participating in. Anything they’re saying is paper-thin, and anything true they say is only true accidentally.


                  Edit: You removed a substantial portion of your comment speculating on Lummis’ motives, and so I was under the impression while writing this that you meant “I don’t think you’re right [about her motives]”.

  • Bone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You don’t care about illegal bombings of boats in the ocean, ICE’s cruel treatment of immigrants and the US citizens who care about them, nor massive sexual assault against underage girls until your face is smeared in it. What do you care about?

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    See, that’s why they redact the shit, so they can skirt responsibility. It’s sad it took this long for people to open their eyes, but at least it seems to be starting to happen?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Heheh. Well, that’s what omnipresent global propaganda is for! Just keep them in the fox news buckets and they’ll never flinch.

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Try to imagine the worst thing you can. It’s so much worse than that.

    Stuff that, once seen, can’t be un-seen.

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I anticipate high levels of guro. Even Republicans may feel some hesitation around R-18G material.