Prices for nearly every major U.S. crop are below what it costs to grow them. But a drop in rice prices means another blow to farmers in Mississippi’s agricultural belt.
Prices for nearly every major U.S. crop are below what it costs to grow them. But a drop in rice prices means another blow to farmers in Mississippi’s agricultural belt.
This means that your agriculture is imported? ironically one of the few areas most nation protect with toll barriers.
I can’t get my head around that industry. In my area there are several vegetable farms, most are sold long before harvesting. So one year they had a amazing cauliflower year. Yields above expected. But they could not sell the excess as there was no buyers. So I could drive past looking at happy elks gorging themselves on delicious cauliflower before they plowed it into the field. And then I went to the local grocery store and bought plastic wrapped cauliflower from Spain…
The logistics of agriculture are outrageous. I just don’t get why you wouldn’t try to make something out of an unwanted crop. You really can’t find one use for that much plant matter? Ferment and/or distill it, get in touch with food banks, anything.
My main exposure to crop farming has been through the series Clarkson’s Farm, so I’m no expert …
… but from what I understand it costs a hell of a lot of money to rent the equipment needed to harvest the crop, and then you still need to store and process it. If there is no guarantee you can sell the end product, sinking loads of money into the harvest is less appealing than just cutting your losses and letting the crop rot.
As extra benefit, plowing them back into the soil means the nutrients get recycled, so less fertilizer needed next year.
It seems like the kind of market inefficiency capitalism so often touts itself as the answer to. Why not make an agreement with a brewery to take the rice, and share any profits from sake? Just as an example, I don’t know if that exact scenario could work with this sort of rice. Pairing up excess produce with businesses who don’t mind getting free materials shouldn’t be that hard.
Which would be a good function of the government, to make sure produce finds a market, and doesn’t get wasted. As long as we subsidize, and we should to protect our abilities to grow food if not for sugar and corn, we should be doing it to lower costs for citizens and to make sure nothing gets wasted.
Like in 2020 during the pandemic, crops were rotting in the fields. They were throwing around trillions of dollars to subsidize corporate profits, but we couldn’t be bothered to make sure crops didn’t get wasted.
thats why its extremely subsidized.
Then it is a waste of money as well, no?
Part of the reason you subsidize is that overproduction most years is a feature. You dont want a “not enough food” situation in the lean years, and growing enough to make sure of that guarantees that the farmers go broke.
That said, the specifics of how and what the US subsidies go to are pretty bad: we mostly pay for the creation of cattle feed and motor vehicle fuel.
I get that. It’s a shame that food isn’t treated as a pubic good that simply needs to be provided for free at the point of consumption. I know some people would maybe overeat, but it’s not like making them pay has solved that problem.
Cauliflower is used to make like noodles for fat people too, there are uses for it.
Inspite of all the advances in agriculture it is still a very volatile industry. Everything from weather to climate to insects to pests to weeds to infection can affect the yield. In addition with scale come problems in harvest, storage, processing. Although there is a lot of mechanisation it is till very labour intensive.
Not a word, my dude: it’s two. Trust your spell-check.
i heard they get money for not selling crops in the us, that fits the bill. Elks arnt going hungry thats for sure.