rav3n@ttrpg.network to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 10 hours agoWhen do you think we'll be able to harness nuclear fusion as a viable source of energy?message-squaremessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down12
arrow-up112arrow-down1message-squareWhen do you think we'll be able to harness nuclear fusion as a viable source of energy?rav3n@ttrpg.network to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 10 hours agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarem_f@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·10 hours agoI don’t have any useful speculation to contribute, but here’s a classic chart showing various funding levels towards that goal: Here’s a slashdot thread from 2012 where some fusion researchers did an AMA type thing: https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/04/11/0435231/mit-fusion-researchers-answer-your-questions Here’s also a recent HN thread about achieving more energy than we put in: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33971377 The crucial bit is this Their total power draw from the grid was 300 megajoules and they got back about 3 megajoules, so don’t start celebrating yet That’s still really encouraging, but just a warning that headlines don’t capture the full picture.
I don’t have any useful speculation to contribute, but here’s a classic chart showing various funding levels towards that goal:
Here’s a slashdot thread from 2012 where some fusion researchers did an AMA type thing:
https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/04/11/0435231/mit-fusion-researchers-answer-your-questions
Here’s also a recent HN thread about achieving more energy than we put in:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33971377
The crucial bit is this
That’s still really encouraging, but just a warning that headlines don’t capture the full picture.