There are enormous geopolitical, economic and climate ramifications to the U.S. abandoning leadership on the energy transition. If you live in America, basically none of them are good.

  • ClownStatue@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Worst thing is those in power in the US think they’re actually winning , and the rest of the world (and actually most of the US) is just wrong!

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think they think of it as winning. I don’t think they care.

      All they know is that several states have economies dependent on fossil fuel extraction with no other meaningful economic replacement.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Some of them are winning. At this point the game us shifting to an internal fight between domestic oligarchs for power and therefore profit.

  • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    U.S. abandoning leadership on the energy transition

    Uhm? How the fuck does one abandon something they never had??

    • silence7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A lot of early wind, solar, battery, and electric vehicle work was done in the US. The country has steadily lost leadership in all of those due to a lack of political support

  • sartalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Oh yeah!? Well, we caught up to China in fascism, so we can catch up to them in clean energy too!

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Will America even be around in a decade… Are they gonna have a two state solution? Or something like One America, two systems? Hard to say.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No. You can’t split a country along urban/rural lines. Even if you split out the south, the rest would fight to take it back due to all the resources there, especially things like military bases.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That would be bad. I can’t see a scenario where the US crumbles in a decade without global collateral damage.

      A silent exit from global superpower would be the best option that involves the least amount of bloodshed

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’d much prefer to see the US split up into separate states, then form a union much like the EU instead of the monolithic eldritch crap they have right now.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s sort of what we have now? A federal government that is made up of a union of states…

        What we really need is to fix Congress and restore their power.

        Republicans have been shifting power from Congress to the executive and judicial branches for the last 50 years. All because they want a king.

        Fixing Congress would take a single bill. Namely H.R. 4125, the Equal Voices Act.

        Well, that’s the first step. There are more, but H.R. 4125 would be like 70% of it.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Don’t worry, America is skillfully avoiding the dust clouds by running in the fully opposite direction, towards irrelevance!