I’m asking for public policy ideas here. A lot of countries are enacting age verification now. But of course this is a privacy nightmare and is ripe for abuse. At the same time though, I also understand why people are concerned with how kids are using social media. These products are designed to be addictive and are known to cause body image issues and so forth. So what’s the middle ground? How can we protect kids from the harms of social media in a way that respects everyone’s privacy?

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sorry, why are you on Lemmy then if you’re non-plussed about handing over your ID? Social media sites (that I use) do not have a picture of me, or my acrtual identity.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I think that answer is obvious.

      Also I think it’s naive to think you’re not already cataloged, especially given that we recently learned definitively that Google is feeding data to the government illegally without a warrant, thanks to the FBI desperately trying to look competent by publicizing doorbell camera footage for a person that didn’t have a Google account.

      If Google is doing this, every corporate social media site is doing it.

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I could think of some reasons maybe, but none seem to stand out. The fact that big-tech is going to increasingly flagrantly violate our privacy as a precondition to use the services is an increasingly major one.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Ask yourself why you’re on Lemmy instead of Reddit, or FB, or Twitter.

              That’s what I’m getting at.

              Comparing one to the other is illogical, because even though they possess similar functions, they are completely different.

              There is no algorithm here, no ads, no tracking. There are actual enforced rules and human moderation. I am not having my feed tracked to sell me bullshit, and no one needs my ID.

              That’s my I am here and not there.

              However, the big tech companies are not asking your permission to spy on you, as has been proved by the Guthrie case.

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Ask yourself why you’re on Lemmy instead of Reddit, or FB, or Twitter.

                Privacy is a big reason.

                How do you even expect a decentralised service run by hobbyists to even implement age-ID in the first place?

                However, the big tech companies are not asking your permission to spy on you, as has been proved by the Guthrie case.

                Yes, but again, they do not have my face or my actual ID. They can make a profile from my posts and it would resemble what I believe but in theory, after long posting on Lemmy or Piefed - they could implement tools to do the same thing.

                • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Yes, they do.

                  If you haven’t given it, your neighbor’s doorbell has. If you’ve used a search engine, you’ve been recorded. If you have a smart phone, they know absolutely everything about you.

                  You do not have privacy anymore if you are using electronics equipped with a wireless connection.

                  It’s silly to pretend that an ID requirement is endangering your privacy when you live in a world where you are constantly tracked.

                  But the bigger evil is the effect social media has on developing young brains, so I’m fine with an ID requirement as a means of locking children out, until a better solution presents itself

                  • Skavau@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 hours ago

                    If you haven’t given it, your neighbor’s doorbell has. If you’ve used a search engine, you’ve been recorded. If you have a smart phone, they know absolutely everything about you.

                    We’re talking specifically about my face as provided by me via my own social media accounts.

                    I’d still like to know how you think this is remotely enforceable on the Fediverse, much less all websites. How can people here even afford it?