cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510

The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker.

21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.

Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing.

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public.

Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.

The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Who wrote this shit, “…Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens…” so a teenager or child and not a woman then?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      She’s a woman now, and was when the interviews occurred over 30 years after the sexual assaults.

      The woman was sexually assaulted when she was in her early teens.

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think the intended meaning is that she was a woman when the allegations were made but the (alleged) events took place when she was in her early teens.

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      US media keeps calling the children in the Epstein files women for some reason. It’s been an ongoing theme. German speaking media will occasionally use the German word for minor, but they often also just lazily translate from US sources and use the German word for women/woman.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t even know what to say about how ham-fisted and just plain dumb this attempt to rewrite history is. What’s depressing is that for far too many people, it’ll still work.

    If we make it through this, history textbooks are going to need to have chapters on what cult-think does to people, and like half of it will be about MAGA.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You mean like Hitler and Germany?

      We already have history textbooks about this… there’s even a pretty popular book that is a great allegory for what’s going on. Based sometime in the 1980s I believe.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The internet has given us a nice archive of the thoughts of brainwashing victims that didn’t exist in Nazi Germany.

        Personally I think Brave New World is a better representation of our dystopia than 1984. People aren’t trying to avoid thoughtcrime because they’re afraid of a boot to the neck (yet) but are instead lulled into complacency by a “keep your head down” culture and lulled into complicity by a “choose your own truth” media landscape.

        • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yep. You only have to believe things that you want to believe because someone somewhere will validate whatever bullshit you can imagine.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          We’re going to get a combo of both of the books. People are already paying to install telescreens, after all.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The optimist in me hopes it’s some malicious compliance on the part of the low level employees who do the actual work.

      The realist in me is pretty sure it’s just incompetence all the way down.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sometimes I wish I could be a believer in religion so that I might have solace that evil people will at least face divine justice in death even if they received no Earthly justice in life. Alas, the depressing truth is that evil coasts through life without facing justice all the time, and the good just as often fall victim to the machinations, crimes, and sadism of the evil and never find any justice, retribution or closure after it. It’s one of the reasons that I don’t believe unfortunately.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      I kinda feel like the best part about being non-religious is the knowledge that everyone faces the same justice in the end. Entropy and all that.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        I don’t really see how ceasing to exist is justice, nor how the fact that your naba and Hitler had the same ending is a comfort. But to each their own, I guess.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      what did the king say to the pope? you keep em dumb, i’ll keep em poor

      the very idea that there is some space wizard that’ll make everything right in the end is a tool to keep the downtrodden complacent. opiate of the masses

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      tbf, establishment dems/R’s have kept this shit under wraps much more tightly for…decades

      unironically the most transparent president ever, because he’s too unawares/dementiad to even remotely control his projections.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So it’s “transparency through incompetence”, the corrolary to “security through obscurity”

  • rogsson@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hope he burns painfully in hell for all eternity together with his corrupt pedo-ring protecting administration. Dream come true if someone ever speed up his arrival. Only boss Putin would miss him.