• [object Object]@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Which ‘port designed by Apple’? Apple’s Lightning is quite obviously more sturdy than usb-c, being just a puck with contacts, put into a hole with contacts and without flimsy plastic tongues. However, Lightning is more costly to produce, while afaik USB was always made from cheap sheet metal.

    Though you might mean Thunderbolt, since afaik usb-c is made to be able to carry Thunderbolt. Not sure if that involved more than electrical concerns, however.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The moving parts are in the device rather than the cable with Lightning. The tongue on USB-C is required to be deep enough that you can’t torque it with the cable during insertion/removal.

      It’s not an obvious comparison, but the mechanical engineers where I work seem to have a mild preference for USB-C

      The expensive part of both is that you need a microcontroller in the cable

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        By ‘moving parts’ you mean the springed contacts? Yeah wow, that’s a lot of movement.

        USB-C has more pins because it was made later and is required to carry standards like Displayport and Thunderbolt. If Apple made Lightning 2, nothing prevents them from slapping more contacts on it.