California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

  • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If America was a serious country they would break up Amazon for this AND arrest Bezos and send him to Guantanamo. But I fear they never were.

      • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        I’m being hyperbolic, but I do think every CEO of every company in America worth hundreds of billions should be arrested, have their companies broken up, and them sent to Supermax prisons for mass fraud.

    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      A nitpick, but America won’t have Gitmo in that scenario tho. Displacing american people to random countries now is deeply rooted in the premise it’s okay to have a torture camp franchized over to places out of everyone’s sight. It wasn’t okay before and it’s not now, and serious country with some sense and a accountability would not employ such tactic.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Easy solution: don’t use Amazon.

    You lived without it before. You can do it again.

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They drove a large swath of stores out of business. It’s vastly more difficult

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah it was a trap.

        The best you can do now is order a lot of stuff directly from China.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          Time to replace Amazon dropshipping with AliExpress.
          Probably same vendor at the end.
          The only iasue I see is local customer service and return of an order.
          That is way easier with Amazon (at the cost of the seller).

    • FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      That’s like saying the simple solution to global warming is for people to not burn fossil fuels. (It ignores the conditions that lead to this becoming a problem in the first place; and it ignored the power of entrenched industry to protect their own interest.

      What we need is political reform. so that the bodies that are supposed regulate industry and serve the public are empowered to make the necessary reforms. Lina Kahn was doing just that (before Trump got elected again in 2024)

      I’m not trying to diminish the importance and role of personal accountability and individual action, but as a solution to affect meaningful change it falls well short.

    • KNova@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This has been my play since last February. In some ways it sucks, because Amazon really cornered the market on niche solutions to niche problems. However, when there is something I absolutely need I try to look for a local solution and if I can’t find that, I use eBay. By no means a perfect solution (ie. a lot of the eBay vendors still use Amazon to fulfill their shipments) but my mindset shifted from “oh yeah go on Amazon and press Buy Now immediately” to really working through a solution, and whether or not I need to purchase an item to enact that solution.

        • KNova@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          yes, always disappointing when this happens, but you can usually find vendors who avoid the practice (with some trial and error).

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s easy to take a noble stance when you can afford it. A lot of people rely on the cheapest prices just to get by.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Amazon isn’t the cheapest option in many cases. What you’re saying makes sense if people shop around, the problem is that they generally don’t.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          Dependso n the area, in remote areas amazon can be WAY cheaper so long as you pass the free shipping threshold even if the items themselves are more expensive.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Even if 7 add shipping costs, Amazon is typically more expensive. I order my car parts from rock auto and have NEVER found Amazon to be cheaper even after adding shipping costs. They were cheap maybe a decade ago when they were trying to fold everybody else but they got enough fools by the short and curlies to start jacking prices up until people start looking elsewhere. Same formula as Wal Mart, it’s a proven good practice for big corps to kill local and small businesses.

  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Can openers is what did it for me.

    In 2015 I needed a new manual can opener. The local big-box stores had two basic styles. A cheap, all metal one that was just stamped from a single sheet, and a more expensive one with better handles.
    The more expensive one had previously rusted and began to look nasty within a few years.
    Amazon had a bunch of different styles at less than the price point of the more expensive one.

    I bought one. It was fine. I didn’t love the operation. It cut the whole top off from the side, rather than from the top in a downwards cut. The sharp edges were on the can rather than on the lid. It would catch the paper labels and sometimes wad them up into the can while you cut. Cans with no air space would leak when opened.

    Anyway. Replaced it in 2019. Amazon still had a broad selection, but all except for obvious crap was as expensive as the local big box store’s expensive option. Wound up going to a smaller local(ish) bulk foods store and bought a cheapo restaurant one for less than Amazon’s/the big box store’s similar offerings. Minimal rusting to date.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I figured as such when I noticed, on multiple occasions, prices for random products would just suddenly change, multiple times a week for different people I knew. And also how seemingly multiple different pages for the same product were available with a word switched here and there… friends got product page 1, I got product page 2. Same product different price. Amazon always seemed shady to me and was kinda surprised it was always the go to online store for people.
    I could never trust a price on amazon, even though they were always almost always cheaper than local alternatives.

    • Raglan@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It all started careening downhill when they swapped to whatever marketplace crap is in place now. OG amazon was a revelation back in the day.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        I mean…Sold amd shipped by Amazon is still a thing.
        But even they sell counterfeited items.

        So the only way to get a 100% genuine item is through the manufacturer (e.g. Samsung and storage media) or hope and pray you don’t get a scam product/test it after receiving.

        Honestly: Aliexpress at times feels more genuine than Amazon. If it wasnt for the 20 stores by the same authenticated seller (the seller page is more obscured than on Amazon)

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There was a time when Amazon was not full of scummy rip-off products, when it was not playing games with prices, when it was not a cloud-computing powerhouse, and you know what happened?

    That’s right, they crushed their adversaries (retail shopping) and earned billions in profits. They won.

    But somehow that’s not enough winning, there isn’t enough winning until all the value has been vacuumed up from the world.

    • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Bezos explicitly undercut the competition for years to drive all of the competition out of business. Amazon took as much time from 1997-2016 to make as much profit as they did in 2017, which is also (not) coincidentally when they hit peak market saturation and were able to start raising their prices.

      So what you’re talking about was real, but it wasn’t like, “back when Amazon was good”, they were just preparing for what they are now. Having a huge monopoly on just about everything has always been their win condition, and they’re no where near done winning.

      • octobob@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah. It’s the same thing Uber did with pushing cab services out of business.

        Not only that, but AWS is the real money maker for them. Not that retail and gaming and prime and whatever don’t also make boat loads of cash, but it doesn’t even graze AWS. The scale of these data centers is unreal and most of the internet runs on AWS.

        I’m an industrial electrician with background on what they’re ordering and installing in terms of control panels and if you saw the weekly shipments it’d make you sick. And we’re only one supplier, they have others.

        • Sineljora@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think it’s worse because Bezos (ex-wallstreet) had his buddies at Bain Capital short-and-distort competing companies into bankruptcy, which has the added bonus of clearing the tax burden from the gains on those shorts.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And that is why I no longer buy anything from them. I’m just embarrassed it took me as long as it did to realize what they were really doing.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The frustrating thing is we can’t boycott AWS since so many of the sites we use run on it. But yes, we absolutely shouldn’t buy things through Amazon or any of the other web stores Amazon owns.

          • frunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            49 minutes ago

            we absolutely shouldn’t buy things through Amazon or any of the other web stores Amazon owns.

            I try to use eBay as an alternative, though i find every 3-4 orders i place there, i get one in an Amazon box that by all rights appears to have been shipped by Amazon. I swear people are drop-shipping stuff from Amazon to their eBay buyers.

      • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You can’t really compare online book retailer Amazon to global online marketplace Amazon. Your underlying point is still mostly correct, but I would exclude the years that they were primarily focused on books. From my lived memory they didn’t really become the online retail juggernaut until a few years after the launch of Prime. Free shipping turned them into what it is today. So maybe the best comparison would be from like 2006-2016? Or maybe I’m wrong and thebl distinction isn’t necessary. Idk. I’m just trying to foster conversation

        • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, I remember Amazon the book store. I still had my mom take me to the local bookstores, cause I knew them and the people, so I was comfortable lol. I remember when Prime launched. I don’t think anyone was expecting that, at the time. Free 2-day shipping on so many products was insane. And all for $89?/yr? Especially, when everywhere else online charged anywhere from $5-10. It was truly the Walmart of the online world. They ate shipping costs, which killed them, and put hurt their competition until AWS became such a powerhouse and they had a monopoly on online marketplaces.

          • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s what’s crazy to me, they survived the dot com crash and were so diversified that I have no idea how they stayed afloat. I would think that all of the combined expenses across all of their ventures without a true cash cow would sink them. Instead they survived and became the trash heap of consumer rights violations that they are.

            • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              55 minutes ago

              Prime launched after the dot com crash. The reason Amazon survived is because they WEREN’T running a dozen different ventures. They were an online bookstore and people kept buying books. Amazon benefited from the crash because that was when they started buying up servers to build AWS.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ehhh not really. They operated at massive losses for a decade or more to eliminate the competition while growing their customer base. This is simply stage 1 of enshittification. You can only do this if you’re unbelievably filthy fucking rich. Then at some point they needed to cash out on all the good will and reputation they developed and that brings us to the shithole economy of today where people are simply too lazy to shop anywhere else.

    • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The other commenters here are right about Amazon’s initial methods, but I’m also going to highly recommend Cory Doctorow’s Enshittification for a detailed explanation of how this happens (including a breakdown on Amazon specifically) and what to do about it.

    • Entropy_Pyre@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      To quote a favorite singer of mine,

      You could fill a man with gold, and still have room for greed.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They need to make (most favoured nation status) illegal. Sellers should be free to set the price they want on any platform. If a seller can offer it cheaper on their own site, or on another platform, they should be allowed to.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Bezos was a hedge fund manager. This should surprise nobody.

  • Tundra_Lifeform@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Holy shit guys! S-so, if you have a monopoly, it’s like, you can do whatever the fuck you want? So it’s like in THE FUCKING GAME OF MONOPOLY? Jee, we are learning something new every day

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In the game, you have to improve your properties to charge more rent. In reality, the monopoly can reduce quality and raise price at the same time.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You dont really improve it, just added more units. Its about volume, not quality.

    • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In the game, even if you’ve built yourself up, an unlucky roll can still lose you the game. As opposed to real life, where the government decides you’re too big to fail.

            • jaybone@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Was going to add “Gee Whiz” which comes before that one? Like it got shorter, then it got longer again?

              • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Oh, I thought that was the… just… regulat step. hehe.

                I guess for some sort of vaguely-serious discussion[1], without doing any research, I think Jesus / Jesus Christ has stably evolved to Gee, with some variants like Gee Whiz being pretty common. I think Gee Willikers was more common around the TV Batman era and so now it’s less said straight and more said ironically. heh. I can’t think of any other common “Gee [something]”… maybe “Geezie Kreezie”, but I’ve only heard that from Suzy[2] Izzard, so not sure if that’s common or not. lol

                It definitely got short; I wonder if we’d count a second word as it getting longer, or a second word replacing “Christ”. These are the types of inconsequential discussions I love. :)


                1. which I find interesting but most others don’t lol ↩︎

                2. previously Eddie ↩︎

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is OK because our Leaders are Looking out For the COMMON man! That’s why I’m going to ENTHUSIASTICALLY Vote for the Billionaire AGAIN!

  • obelisk_complex@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m always a little shocked when people ask me if my product is on Amazon. I never even considered it because I’ve known what they are for so long; it’s been a bit of a wakeup call that most people still have no idea how fucking awful Amazon is. It sucks struggling with market visibility, selling just from my own website, but it beats the hell out of being bullied like this until I’m big enough to have my product stolen and copied by Amazon Basics.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The appeal of Amazon is the things that surround the store.

      When I buy from a random website it often takes weeks to ship, costs more to ship, makes me deal with CC fraud if something is untoward, fights me on returns and I usually have to pay to ship back etc etc.

      Amazon is bad for a number of reasons but the main driver for me is not the choice of things on there, it’s everything else.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And that’s what they innovated. Anyone can make a website that sells shit. They innovated the supply chain, storage, shipping and delivery.

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You have to do way more marketing since you can’t rely on search result hits, right?

      It would be cool if there were a business fediverse type deal where searching worked across all the small business federated web sites. Such a network should putposely exclude or kick out (politely and with a celebration) anyone that got too large, to maintain a small business focus to basically give the little guys a leg up.

      It would be like a fediverse small bis cooperative kinda thing. That way there would be a search box for products and services that everyone could use to search the entire small bis network. And this would bypass monopolies like Google or Amazon.

      • ConstableJelly@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Search results on Amazon are fully pay-to-play anyway. You don’t get anywhere near the top of the list without paying for the privilege. No big deal for slop producers who sell in volume, but basically useless for small businesses or private sellers.

  • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Bought something from AliExpress last week. Showed up in an Amazon box 😐 Aggravating that the only way to avoid them is apparently never shop online. I already mostly don’t, but sheesh.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I bought something off Facebook marketplace that turned out to be someone proxying Amazon. I respect the hustle on that one, I suppose I deserved it for not checking more throughly.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          Those sellers post their stuff on every marketplace they can, and just fulfill it through their Amazon store. Ebay, Etsy, Walmart, Best Buy, etc, are all full of Amazon sellers.

  • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I use Aliexpress over Amazon whenever possible.

    It’s insane the amount of scams going on on Amazon.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Aliexpress search results are garbage. A dozen knockoffs of the same thing, sorting doesn’t work, and when you search for a specific part it shows you the price of the right product but the wrong variety.

        But it’s cheaper than Amazon, cuts out Bezos, and for standard shipping is usually about as fast.

        • Raglan@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I cancelled prime a while back and I’ve been mostly trying to order direct from manufacturers when possible. Costs more but I figure that’s the price of not contributing to a known bad actor in some small way.

          Thanks for the summary. I’ll keep in in mind if I can’t find a more direct route.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            It’s probably still cheaper than prime. It hasn’t been worth the money for me for years. I still try to buy from local businesses that deserve support first, though.

    • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m the same way I’ll look up a product… When it’s obviously an import… I’ll just go to AliExpress and get it there.

      The time savings isn’t worth the additional price imho

    • antbricks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      First time using AliExpress I got scammed. I got a refund, at least, but I haven’t been back since.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      LOL WTF are you talking about!? Virtually everything on AliExpress is a scam.

      • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Seems to me like over half the crap on Amazon is just drop shipped AliExpress junk anyway. Why not cut out the middle asshole?

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do you think AliExpress is manufacturing all that shit? It’s a digital storefront (middle asshole), just like Amazon. Difference is Amazon will refund just about anything with no questions asked. Ali will just tell you “better luck next time”. Not to mention that they blocked my VPN so I couldn’t buy from them if I wanted to.

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah it’s cutting out one of the middle assholes so it’s one instead of two. From the stuff I get recommended on Amazon it’s pretty clear they don’t care about false advertising either. Cant help you with your vpn problem though

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Once again, AliExpress is not a manufacturer. It’s a digital storefront. Just like Amazon. You’re not cutting out anyone.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites

    This is and has been part of Amazon’s contract to be listed on their site since the beginning. They are not even remotely the only one doing this. It’s an industry norm in digital storefronts. Valve has also been sued for this several times. I don’t know why we’re acting like this is a recent discovery.

    We need to just ban this practice, because as long as they’re allowed to, they will.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Valve states you can’t sell a steam key in another platform for cheaper than in steam, not that you can’t sell your game anywhere else at a lower price. That’s slightly different than here. Not defending it just saying that it is actually different than here.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I just want to add in that what Valve has as official policy and what they actually practice differ in this case. Because yes, their policy states it’s for keys only. However, they have admitted in court that if the publisher has it as a cheaper price elsewhere, they will delist your game

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            The Wolfire versus Valve antitrust case.

            They submitted evidence during the discovery process of email chains from Valve customer support stating that they want Valve to have the best deal available and that they will not choose to do business with companies that do not give them the best deal.

            On top of that, they also went on record stating that the steam product key page under the Steamworks area is meant to be intended for all products on Steam, not just keys.