In a rare public address, former president said US is experiencing ‘dark days’ and urged Americans to vote

Joe Biden has warned that his presidential successor, Donald Trump, will attempt to “steal” the midterm elections, in a rare public address.

Speaking in South Carolina, where he was being honored for his lifetime achievement in politics, Biden also asserted that the US is experiencing “dark days”, in a speech made hours before the Trump administration launched attacks on Iran.

Reprising a line from the 2020 campaign that saw him defeat Trump and end Trump’s first presidency, Biden told the crowd at the Columbia Museum of Art on Friday that the “battle for the soul of this nation is one that’s never really over”. He simultaneously criticized Trump’s plan to introduce potentially prohibitive voting requirements ahead of the midterms.

MBFC
Archive

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Vote hard enough that they legitimately lose, so that the correct course of action is more justified

      It already is, of course, but a large majority needs to agree

        • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          At least it can be contested then. It will get more support from people. If they’re going to rig it (hack machines, miscount votes), nothing can be done. But if they’re just trying to weasel they’re way into disenfranchising people, they can be beaten with turnout.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s a good starting point. The more people vote, the more people will be angry if the result is stolen.

      Apathy is the worst threat against democracy. Especially when one part is cheating.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Its the only strategy really.

      The bigger the tilt against republicans the harder it is to steal.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is barely even a strategy. It’s the “take no action” approach. It’s easy, but definitely won’t accomplish very much.

        A far better approach would be to organize a leftist January 6 or similar. Get as many people organized and armed as possible.

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Jan 6 came dangerously close to succeeding and was the most disorganized mess of incompetent morons imaginable. Get half a dozen transgender hackers in charge of communications and a few hundred antifa supersoldiers to the capitol, they will do the needful.

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            What part of “vote in rigged election” is a “viable” strategy?

            • GraniteM@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              1964, Presidential Election (LBJ vs Goldwater):

              Johnson won 61% of the popular vote. Even if there had been a concerted effort to rig the election against Johnson, it would have had to be so widespread and obvious that it would have been either stopped immediately, or it would have resulted in a new civil war. Getting that many people voting the right way should be the goal; make the margin of victory so wide as to be impossible to overcome via subtle chicanery.

              If they still try to steal the election in those circumstances, then there will be violence, which is the only other option for changing government, so we might as well try having the election before the violence.

              TLDR:

              • underisk@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                There have already been extremely obvious attempts to steal US elections. The guy in charge right now tried to lead one. Some were even successful. People weren’t rioting in the street or overthrowing the government when Bush got handed the election by the supreme court, and that’s a much more recent precedent that refers to a successful steal, rather than a failed one.

                Did anyone who tried to rig this one election 80 years ago face consequences? Were any measures taken by those in power to prevent another attempt?

                • GraniteM@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  2000 Presidential Election:

                  Popular vote: 50,456,002 (Bush) / 50,999,897 (Gore)

                  Bush won because the margin was so narrow. He lost the popular vote but eked out an electoral college win because of Florida.

                  Per Wikipedia:

                  Bush carried Florida by only 537 votes out of 5.96 million cast in the state (a margin of 0.009%).

                  Nader took 97,488. If less than one percent of Nader voters had gone for Gore, Gore would have won the state, and who knows what timeline we’d be living in now.

                  Elections can be stolen when the margin is that narrow. When the margin is wide, it’s impossible to steal.