Not really. Youth rights is just as important in itself as getting rid of religion - and while religion and other harmful worldviews still exists, children shouldn’t be affected by them just as adults shouldn’t be - parenting has the ability to be a theocracy, which is against freedom of religion, bodily autonomy, and women’s rights, if you view children and adolescents as people.
There’s a difference between allowing a child to choose which permanent change they want to happen to them out of two options, or delaying the choice, rather than making a permanent choice that can be made mater at no detriment.
I’m not trying to argue against transgender stuff, I’m just responding to your claim that kids should do whatever they want with their bodies with no intervention. Even if you’re fine with kids transitioning then, surely, allowing kids to do whatever they want is a bit too extreme
Then it sounds like your original take is merely a bandaid for a much larger problem.
Not really. Youth rights is just as important in itself as getting rid of religion - and while religion and other harmful worldviews still exists, children shouldn’t be affected by them just as adults shouldn’t be - parenting has the ability to be a theocracy, which is against freedom of religion, bodily autonomy, and women’s rights, if you view children and adolescents as people.
So if a 4 year old wants to get a face tattoo of a zebra we should let them?
There’s a difference between allowing a child to choose which permanent change they want to happen to them out of two options, or delaying the choice, rather than making a permanent choice that can be made mater at no detriment.
I’m not trying to argue against transgender stuff, I’m just responding to your claim that kids should do whatever they want with their bodies with no intervention. Even if you’re fine with kids transitioning then, surely, allowing kids to do whatever they want is a bit too extreme