fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1364arrow-down16
arrow-up1358arrow-down1external-linkArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareZarxrax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·8 hours agoI mean they fired the guy, and the guy took full responsibility for the errors. If that’s not blaming the journalist, I don’t know what is.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down28·8 hours agoTbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title mentions “controversy.” Also are people so lazy they can’t make up their own fake quotes? Was AI really needed here?
minus-squareprotist@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·7 hours ago Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title… Say no more. Please
minus-squareKhanzarate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 hours agoAre people so lazy they can’t even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would’ve been useful here to generate its own defense.
minus-squarebrambc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·6 hours agoBeing too lazy to read is one thing, not being too lazy to then comment is a whole other kind of existence.
I mean they fired the guy, and the guy took full responsibility for the errors. If that’s not blaming the journalist, I don’t know what is.
Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title mentions “controversy.” Also are people so lazy they can’t make up their own fake quotes? Was AI really needed here?
JFC RTFM
Say no more. Please
Are people so lazy they can’t even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would’ve been useful here to generate its own defense.
Being too lazy to read is one thing, not being too lazy to then comment is a whole other kind of existence.