So let’s recap…
You gave NATO and all your allies the middle finger by cutting their budget, tariffing them, insulting them, attempting to bully them into complying with your will, and threatening to invade some of them…
You seemingly forgot their contributions to America’s previous pointless wars in the Middle East by saying they “weren’t on the front lines”, when most of them had sent people who lost their lives…
You end US funding for Ukraine’s defense because you didn’t think it was your problem, and you told Europe that it’s their job to foot the bill…
You give the UN and NATO the middle finger with this farcical and extortionary “Board of Peace”…
And now you launch a pointless invasion of Iran and complain that NATO, a defensive organization is “rejecting” you by not participating in it?
Get fucked, old man!
He can ask “Board of Peace” for help
“Bored of Peace”
haha didn’t think of that yet. The “thank you” from trump to Qatar, Bahrain, Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Jordan: quite a few of the members got fucked over very quickly with the generous gift of regional instability!
What does he think NATO is? Isn’t the treaty to protect against aggression, not be the aggressors?
He believes he is the king of the world and NATO is a human resources investment similar to the many departments of Trump Kingdom LLC.
Far as he’s concerned, who cares if that’s not their job or intention. He’s paying the bills damn it - he pay the bill, plebs do what he says. It’s really that simple.
A human resources investment which he has cut the funding for
he pay the bill
Narrator: Trump never pays his bills
Trump paid a bill? Nah, that doesn’t sound right.
He must have believed the russian propaganda about them being imperialist aggressors or something…
NATO is not just bureaucracy, it’s an alliance. You CAN ask allies for help, but you are supposed to treat them as such.
He’s spent more than the last decade doing nothing but criticizing NATO and saying it should be abolished and is shocked when they won’t cover his war crimes and the consequences there of? Stable genius everybody.
I mean, some NATO nations have been known to join the US in a dumb fight. But Trump has also directly tariffed and threatened many of the nations that would normally help the US. Friends are gonna be short supply.
Hm, many NATO countries actually did the latter for the US in the past.
The US was actually attacked at that time. Iraq was a different story and “coalition of the willing” was used.
NATO’s Article 5 was invoked only once, by the US. Trump had the audacity to insult (former?) allies and deny that ever happened.
I think it’s great no one wants to join his unsanctioned war.
wtf is this headline
Defense organization want not to help in the attack war.
One of those where just one use of the word “and” would’ve helped.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headline#Headlinese
Have to make sure the Internet doesn’t run out of bit, by using mangled English!
He should star on another reality tv show: The Biggest Loser
NATO was created as a defensive measure to present a combined defence in the event of being attacked.
It was NOT created to provide back up to a wannabe Napoleon with tiny dick syndrome because he decides to start a war on his own.
… to cover his previous child raping activities
Show a bit of respect for people with tiny dicks, they don’t deserve to be compared to this madman
Which NATO nation was attacked in Yugoslavia in 1999?
A valid point and frankly still a stain on the organisation that they failed to justify. History aside it does not alter the fact of why it was created and why it should not be aiding the Fanta Fuhrer now.
He’s been rejected by everybody he’s ever met. That’s probably why he’s a rapist and a predator.
He’s the spoiled little rich kid who comes over to the sandbox while others are building a sand castle, proceeds to destroy the sand castle, then kicks his ball over the fence and wants everyone to come help him get his ball back.
MAGA elected the most little bitch ass spoiled rich kid on earth.
Israel forced him into it, there is a reason we are calling it Operation Epstein’s Fury. Because they have the tapes of the president, and ivy league aristocrats, fucking children.
Agreed
He wasn’t even that rich anymore. It was all theater. His hotels were in a sad state. His scams weren’t working anymore. It was all almost over.
The election saved his ass.
Now he’s rich, after grabbing anything he can get his hands on. Even in his first term he was quoted as saying that it was all “his money” now. All his debts are gone, all the banks folded. All the big companies as well, because they saw that they could “use” him to also get more money.
If he was a spoiled rich kid before, think what he is now. He sees himself as a god.
I mean, it’s kind of hard to argue with results. Fraud convictions and imminent sentencing turned into another chance to loot the public coffers because dumb-dumbs think the Gaza genocide wouldn’t also continue to happen under him.
The only silver lining, and I really mean only, is that he’s so small intellectually that he’ll (hopefully) never see it through to it’s full potential.
As long as they keep the chimp away from the nukes, we should survive him, so that we can then be torn apart by climate change.
Someone warn Spain and Egypt in case he gets confused about his straights.
Reads like a text chat between an incel and a woman on the internet.
Trump: You are stupid. You are ugly and fat. I’m so much better than you ever will be and also fuck all our agreements. Null and void. And you owe me $13.47 for that coffee I paid for.
Them: stares confused . Then watches their economies be negatively impacted by trump.
Trump: hey we are buddies right? Come help me bomb civilians.
Them: no thanks.
Trump: you are a stupid fat ugly bitch and I don’t need you anyway.
Trump (next day): how’s it going? . So when are you deploying your troops to help out at the straight?
Them: blocks trump
Yup. It’s really as simple as that. Trump is a sociopathic abuser, and the macro version of that is essentially the same as the micro.
true story.
I read this in the South Park style “Hey Satan!” way.
NATO’s job is to protect member states from Russian aggression. Trump has zero concept of history.
Trump’s Pentagon insisted on a go-it-alone approach to Iran at the outset. This wasn’t NATO’s choice it was Hegseth’s choice.
Even fucking Chimp-in-Chief Bush Jr had the decency to assemble the “Coalition of the Willing” in Iraq. Rubio couldn’t be bothered to get the fucking Turks and Saudis on board, and they’ve hated Iran since the Ottoman Empire fell.
Absolutely bonkers to talk about this as some kind of NATO failure to comply when the treaty was never invoked to begin with. Doubly so, when you consider how many NATO bases are still ultimately being used by US forces to get hardware into position.
The Ottomans were at war with Iran for like 3 or 4 centuries before Turkey was even formed. And they mostly lost.
It’s the same picture. Just ask anyone in Istanbul
What a fucking toooooooooooool to the power of infinity. Same goes for supporters and enablers.
Just yesterday, Danish media posted a description of how they planned to blow up airport runways to slow down an American invasion of Greenland. And how other European countries sent soldiers to help defend.
Trump complaining about Europe now not helping in Iran is some major chutzpah…
Still too big for this fool.
That was one labored sentence! I cannot be the only one that parsed it as: “Trump says he’s been rejected by NATO (while) most allies (are) to join mission …”
Instead, it wants to say: “Trump says he’s been rejected by NATO and most allies (in his desire for them) to join mission …”
Yeah, this is awful. Headlinese is fun and all, but this is too much.
The comma is for enumeration and not for segregation of two sentences. So it makes sense. They just used a comma instead of an “and”.
Which is extremely annoying
News title grammar has distinctly different rules from normal language. Extreme brevity and using commas in place of any other punctuation are typical of it.
News title grammar is stupid and I’m rather annoyed at the journalists continuing its use.
Use an “&” ffs…
Which would be justifiable in print. But this is not print, using it here is suboptimal and silly.
Yep, both is possible, “and” is less ambiguous.
