• Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It is astonishing how much insanity we have to tolerate. It is quite evident that gambling is harmful for all, yet we do nothing but remain ageist against the minorities and barely solve the real issue.

    Things are escalating further and further. This isn’t some regular gambling any more, it’s a crime on humanity. Polymarket is the enabler, and as such should be banished. Incentivising peoples misfortunes is anti-humanity.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      99 Kriegsminister
      Streichholz und Benzinkanister
      Hielten sich für schlaue Leute
      Witterten schon fette Beute
      Riefen: „Krieg!“, und wollten Macht
      Mann, wer hätte das gedacht?
      Dass es einmal so weit kommt
      Wegen 99 Luftballons

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        99 Jahre Krieg
        Ließen keinen Platz für Sieger
        Kriegsminister gibt’s nicht mehr
        Und auch keine Düsenflieger
        Heute zieh’ ich meine Runden
        Seh’ die Welt in Trümmern liegen
        Hab’ ‘n Luftballon gefunden
        Denk’ an dich und lass’ ihn fliegen

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have little faith the international community would sufficiently sanction and punish this.

          • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Who exactly is doing the “Mutually Assured” part for Iran?

            If the US deploys a nuke in Iran:

            • as long as it’s not an ICBM over adversaries, it won’t trigger immediate response systems. Tactical nuke would probably be the choice.
            • Russia won’t nuke the US back for this. China won’t nuke the US back for this. Iran doesn’t have nukes, though could do a dirty bomb or something – but that’s not consistent with MAD. Pakistan is cozying up to the US for their war in Afghanistan, and India isn’t highly aligned. There’s no way the EU would nuke the US in retaliation, they’d only deploy them defensively.
            • As much as I would want, I can’t see Canada or Europe severing all ties with the US or going to war over it, which would be the only acceptable responses.

            I do not want the US to do this, they absolutely shouldn’t, but I fear they could do it and it would stir up only a tepid response from protesters and not governments.

            • Mirshe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Russia nukes Kyiv, China nukes Tokyo, North Korea (assuming delivery capabilities) nukes Seoul, India probably drops nukes on China and Pakistan, etc. It’s the actual Domino Theory people were talking about during the Cold War, they just thought the domino was communism. Once the bandaid gets ripped off and nuclear weapons are an accepted and normalized tool of conventional war, they’re now EVERYONE’S first resort.

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Well for one thing, if the US breaks the nuclear armistice then surely russia will point to them as they follow suit.

              Then Europe will be in the awkward position of deciding whether retaliation is called for. If they don’t retaliate, putin keeps nuking ukraine. If Europe does retaliate, putin nukes NATO and the world enters a full-scale global war likely ending in nuclear armageddon.

              Any use of nuclear weapons in any context will have catastrophic results.

              Not that the current “leaders” of the US care about that at all. They’ll hide out in their bunkers while we all fry for their piss poor decisions…

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re not betting, see? You’re buying/investing in a “futures contract” in an open market and there’s no house edge!

      TL;DR it’s gambling but structured in a way that evades current regulations.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Stock markets are legal in most states, so betting is legal in most states if you do it in a way rich people like.

    • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nope, sports betting was decriminalized a few years ago. And everything got so much worse.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Especially since they also legalized advertising for gambling services.

        “Oh don’t worry, just include a disclaimer about gambling addiction and seeking help and I’m sure everything will be fine…”

        …while they promise free money and instant wealth to some of the most vulnerable and impoverished people in the US…

        • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          And… hate to say it, but there are a lot of people with 80-90 level IQ in the US. Many of them struggle with things like forecasting consequences, longterm planning. They are extremely vulnerable to these manipulative marketers.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      WSB went corporate. The true degenerates who couldn’t get to Wall street or the Vegas strip had to go somewhere.

  • foodandart@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmmm. Not sure how perilous the denotation of a nuclear bomb may be but a detonation of one will be an absolute nightmare…

    (I bet the spell check missed it completely since both are correctly spelled, but of course context… and is a perfect example of why actually proof-reading your work before you post it is advisable. Oyyy.)

  • null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’ll just be on some other platform. Gambling is spreading. It’s in fucking everything now.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’d put money on “within 90 days”. France just sent nuclear armed jets to its allies.