me like use nano. nano say how do thing. nano exit easy.
nano is just a text editor, I use it as a text editor, it has keybindings on screen by default, no need to config or memorise, why bother? (for text editing, not whatever people use vim or emacs for)
Kind of, but not really? Nano by default displays US English(?) keyboard bindings which are different to the keyboard I have, so I still have to have a cheat sheet open when I’m on a system with nano-only editor.
Vim users: “I feel bad for you”
Nano users: “I don’t think about you at all”
Nano users :
Me no think
Nano users have more important things to think about, saying this as an nvim user
The image is misleading. The brain sizes represent the amount of grey matter it takes to operate the editor. The nano guy has plenty of brain power left over for things like hygiene, breathing and basic reasoning.
vim guy, emacs guy look big brain. me brain smol. me bathe yesterday, thank you.
I use Helix btw
nice! LMK if they ever get that frontend running
You can subscribe to the GitHub discussion, it looks like there are some prototypes but not a definitive GUI: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/11783
Nano or as I like to call it “The Sudo Editor”
VIsudo -> opens nano ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But… Micro is better
if micro so good, why no installed ?
Unga Nano : turn place linux
Kate users:

Having exposed brain probably lead to significant damages to it.
i use micro
The only daily kate user I seen was a guy writing his operating system on youtube.
Here’s the soundtrack: https://youtube.com/watch?v=TGIvO4eh190
I do appreciate this in nano. It helps me complete the new container config occasionally required to install vim.
I’m team nano, I’m not smart enough to use the other two and for whenever I need to open a text file in terminal only environment once every year I can remember how to navigate nano. So I’ll keep using nano.
I use emacs but it’s only convenient to me with a lot of custom stuff on top. Vanilla emacs tho, hell no.
Yes. It’s newby-friendly, what is great for the time every 2 or 3 years that it opens in my face and there’s no alternative editor installed.
Copy and paste are there too, but there’s no reason to use them instead of the terminal buffer, so I can edit things in an editor I like. I just wish it made it easier to delete several lines at the same time.
CTRL-K,K,K…
That’s racist
Omega-level container brain
micro enters the chat.
Static, portable binary with no dependencies.
Out of the box:
- Syntax highlighting
- Multi-line cursors like Sublime Text
- Mouse support (works incredibly well)
- Splits and tabs for working on multiple files
- Diff gutter
- Copy and paste with system clipboard
- Cross-platform (runs basically on anything that Go does)
- Sane key binds (ctrl-s, ctrl-c, ctrl-v, ctrl-z, ctrl-x, etc)
- Terminal emulator
- Plugin system to extend it
- And much much more
I have nothing to do with the project but this binary is the absolute best. curl or wget to any host and away you go with effectively a Sublime Text / VSCode like in the terminal. It’s as simple as nano and as functional as a well configured and extended vim.
It’s baffling it’s not more well known and not installed by default on major distros.
That’s not a text editor, that’s an IDE.
And emacs is an operating system 😂
And vim is a way of life
I use nano because I can’t be assed to memorize key bindings, but I’ll give this a go
How many Linux distros include micro in their minimal image? Vim, emacs, and nano are good because I can connect to just about any container or Linux VM and expect to have all of them available.
Let’s say I have a test that always passes on my machine but fails in CI. If I can get a terminal on the test runner, I can open up my test code in vim, add extra logging and error handling, and rerun the test to check my fix.
I am not going to install additional editors in a VM that will be recreated next time I push a code change. If I am setting up a development environment for long term use, I will install my favorite IDE and configuring all the bells and whistles.
Most include micro iirc
Never ceases to amaze me how people get so exercised over a text editor.
I remember the time when Linux jokes were about audio drivers and X11 config files, but audio has long been working out of the box, and X11 is already dead and cremated.
Even recompiling kernel now takes around five minutes instead of two hours, so that joke is irrelevant too.
So all we are left with is timeless discussion of which text editor is the best, and dumping on Windows.
This has been a lighthearted fake rivalry for as long as these text editors have existed.
That’s because we all know which is the obvious superior text editor.
Windows 11 Notepad.
But I wouldn’t be surprised if the memes give outsiders the impression that there is a real text editor war.
the ootb audio drivers on my thinkpad running fedora sound better than my work windows laptop
So all we are left with is timeless discussion of which text editor is the best, and
dumping on Windows.why it is nanoFTFY. :P
So all we are left with is timeless discussion of which text editor is the best,
Gnome sucks!
Ducks and runs away
Bullshit, gedit is great
Real answer: those things matter to me because a quick frictionless experience very heavily dependant on muscle memory really helps with my ADHD. Laggy interfaces, having to hold left key for several seconds, and similar issues quickly pull my out of my train of thought.
It’s not about shaving 2 minutes off my day, it’s about not interrupting the flow.
when nerds fight, it’s the text editors that suffer
Because there is only one objectively right answer. Anyone who use anything else is no true unix user.
You mean a Rubik’s cube.
Nano say so at bottom but so does vim if it thinks you’re trying to exit.
It even knows when you discover features by accident
ROFL
The human is thrashing about trying to escape… let me show him how to open the door for the fiftieth time
Just use ed.
Ctrl+D. Easy.
bash: ed: command not found
WHERE GOD NOW?
What sins have you committed on your system to remove ed?
fastfetch | grep ackage
Packages: 2530 (dpkg), 21 (flatpak)me no remove package. me start with vanilla debian install. no need gui until me choose to install gui.
Please file a bug with the Debian maintainers.
How are people supposed to edit files without the standard editor?
with nano? /uj maybe it was an option during the install, IDK, I don’t want to bother the folks with a suspicion and a shitty memory, nor do I want to reinstall deb somewhere else
I was joking, definitely don’t write them to install an editor that’s obsolete.
sed and grep (both inspired by ed) to do most of what ed does in a modern way, and ed was only useful over teletype when it was slow/expensive to render a scrollable field.
All modern TTYs support scroll regions, and with sed it just doesn’t make sense to use ed anymore.
ed as the standard editor is mostly a meme based on this page https://wiki.c2.com/?EdIsTheStandardTextEditor
using arch, btw
actually using debian btw
I mean, nano is cool I guess.
But just today my colleague asked what parameter add to a configuration file. He asked me should it be before or after this line? I told him before, he added it after. He had to select the line with the mouse, copy the text, go above, paste it, go back and delete the line character by character.
I mean, not too bad; but I was feeling very bad while seeing it happen.
^K Cutand^U Uncut(paste) were on the screen the WHOLE time this happened.“The instructions are on screen at all times!” is only a positive if you follow the instructions, otherwise they are wasting space.
Meanwhile in an alternate universe, two people argue about edit vs edlin… 😆
Pico gang rise up!


















