• EV3W0Y797@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve been saving all the .apk files for apps I find valuable, just in case this ends up impacting future GrapheneOS builds.

    Worst case scenario, at least I’d be able to use a saved Pixel for the apps I want, without needing a Google account.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Interesting… I’ve only just started messing with Graphene by putting it on an old Pixel and it seems pretty impressive.

          So you opt to use Aurora? Do you need to install Google Play services to use that one? Seems like the options are Aurora, or creating a second user and installing the sandboxed Play services on that for apps that need it.

          I tried the latter, but it’s basically impossible to sign up for a Google account without giving a phone number these days and I’m not sure I want to log in to my actual Google account since that kind of defeats the purpose…

          Some people seem to have some concerns about Aurora as well

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, but installing from the Play Store is also installing, and “sideloading” is shorter than “installing from outside the Play store”, so I’m not sure this is winnable fight.

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s installing regardless from where you get the app, by labeling it as sideloading these giant corpos want to label it as doing something outside the norm, something that is “unsafe” so they can have control over user behavior and market dominance

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          Yes that’s what I’m saying, it’s “installing” regardless of where you get the app, so if an article wants to talk about concerning installing apps from outside the Play Store, they can’t just say “installing”. That would be incorrect if the things they talk about don’t concern installing from the Play Store.

          So you need a different description than just “installing”.

  • krigo666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And that’s why I’m installing /e/OS in my Fairphone 6, and shifting to Linux based phones.

    Even now Google is removing everything that is a choice to avoid their massive surveillance machine, apps started complaining about removal of UnifiedPush:

    Fuck Google.

      • krigo666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        I have a Jolla C2 with SailfishOS, it has Android app support based on AlienDalvik, and my banking app runs just fine there. I can use Nextcloud, etc. For my needs it runs great.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m on an FP6 with iodéOS, very smooth so far, and apparently security is better than with /e/OS.

      I had to manually flash it though.

        • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, I was very happy that my banks app worked. Also, I found if I keep microg connected to the app lounge, then my bank app would not work. So I keep it set to anonymous connection.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Mine refuse to run in GrapheneOS. Everything runs except my banks’ apps and eBay. It’s an inconvenience but the tradeoff has been worth it.

            • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              Have you tried the workarounds like disabling some exploit protections for the app? It can be finicky but sometimes it’ll make it usable

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Welcome friend! I’ve been having a great time with e/os on my FP6.

      I recommend the lawnchair launcher if you don’t like the stock one.

      • houjou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes lawnchair is a must have with e/os. I like what /e/os is pushing for but im puzzled on why they did this horrendous launcher and the way they change stock android look.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Great. So half my software won’t work.

    Google, just call it what it is. Ad blocking prevention.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This is in no way a jusficitaion for what Google is doing, but they came to a “compromise” where you can still opt-in to being allowed to “sideload unverified apps” (read: install apps that didn’t have to get approval from Google).

      You have to enable it in the settings, and then you need to wait 24 hours before the setting is enabled. After that you can continue to run “unverified” apps

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The “advanced flow” with a one-day wait is just Google realizing they need to boil this frog a little more slowly to prevent a backlash. They still want a fully boiled frog in the end.

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Xiaomi bootloaders used to work like that. You’d have to jump through some bullshit hoops to register your phone for bootloader unlocking, and then wait a few days to finally be able to unlock it. Then they made that worse and worse, and afaik it’s so insanely difficult and inconvenient right now that it’s practically impossible to unlock your Xiaomi phone’s bootloader. This applies to all the brands under that umbrella.

        I am about 97.37% sure Google will do the same over time and at some point you just won’t be able to install any APKs.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Even google’s “verified apps” are full of spyware, backdoors, and telemetry. They’re so fucking hypocritical. Like an abuser who says “You can’t make it in this world without me!”

        Also, is this going to effect third-party ROMs like Lineage and its offshoots?

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          AFAIK, this is only Android, not AOSP that third-party devs would be using for their ROMs - and AOSP can be forked as well, so there’s no reason that Lineage can’t cut that part out if it did make it into AOSP.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 hours ago

        it wont remain at that. i bet they will disable that setting occasionally and make you wait that 24h again and again.

      • wiccan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What I haven’t seen is what happens to all of the apps I currently have installed when this hits.

        Am I going to have to wait 24 hours to open apps I already have installed?

        Will they all get auto-removed and need reinstalling?

        Everything is written as if you’re starting from new not an existing state.

        • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          What happens if I just stop updating android for as long as I can? Quite a few apps on my phone have retained functionality past when their developers attempted to brick them because I froze updates

        • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It won’t do anything to apps already installed. Future apps can be installed either by going through the dev mode unlock process or connecting to a computer and using ADB which doesn’t require a wait period.

        • Coyote9369@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Haven’t seen anything official but I’d assume they will behave as normal and you may not be able to update them without going through the advanced flow. Since ADB installs aren’t restricted I don’t think there will be any changes to existing installs. Just my thoughts based on what they have confirmed so far. I am just waiting for GOS to support the Pixel 10a so I can get further away from Google and their BS in general.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just bought a second hand pixel 6 to test Graphene. Let’s see what Motorola does and how Linux phones do in the future.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s not that “excellent.” It’s just ‘for the evulz’ mustache-twirling comical villainy, which ends up downplaying what’s actually important to know about enshittification, which is how self-serving and abusive it is. When companies enshittify products and services, they’re not just making them worse; they’re specifically making them more exploitative.

        A lot of the examples shown in the video – cutting holes in socks, sawing off a chair leg so it wobbles, drying out a marker, etc. – are not enshittification. Enshittification is stuff like putting spyware in devices so that you double-dip on the purchase price and the value of the data, or turning products (as opposed to services) into a subscription. Stuff that extracts unearned value from the customer.

        It touches on it in the latter part of the video, but for the most part misses the mark.

        • MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You know, it was funny. Bit long in the tooth. The best thing about the video, it was actually produced by Norway. The government produced the video. That’s pretty freaking cool.

          • urushitan 漆たん@kakera.kintsugi.moe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah it was a short PSA for average people, not power users. If it wasn’t funny a lot of people lose interest. It only spends the first 25% on the unrelated comedy bit. And the real point is to get people to the site at the end to learn more.

  • rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Ummm… Isn’t this precisely against the whole EU’s make sideloading (ie. installing) as easy as main app store installing thing?
    Taking steps backwards…

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It took years and legal pressure and fines to have othet app stores decently recognized and allowed. I don’t understand how wr are goinf so back. I mean I understand. Capitalism + monopoly + orange guy.

        • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I also blame the Epic lawsuits. How the fuck did they lose to Apple but win against Google, the platform where Fortnite was still fully playable and monetised?

            • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Basically Epic weren’t happy with the 30% cut that Apple and Google take from app sales and in-app purchases so they introduced a direct payment method which bypassed Apple and Google’s payment methods, but was in violation of their app store rules. In response both Apple and Google removed Fortnite from the app store. Fortnite remained playable on Android because of sideloading but was unplayable on iOS (I’m not even sure if it’s back yet)

              In response Epic sued both companies claiming they held an illegal monopoly. Somehow Apple won and Google lost

              • rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Oh I do recall that now that you mention it. But I wasn’t aware that they lost to Apple. That sounds ridiculous, isn’t it the same thing?!

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We need development of Linux OSs for phones to ramp up. And we need Linux distributors to fight back against “age verification” laws that are actually ID verification laws. There’s a global attack underway on multiple fronts against free software, private computing, and user ownership and control of devices.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago
        1. Android is a Linux distro
        2. Most people, me included, don’t want to run normal Linux on their phone. I use Linux on the desktop. I don’t hate Linux or anything of the sorts. But for phone use, normal Linux sucks major ass. What we need is GrapheneOS to be normalized and independent app stores for graphene.
      • ZombieChicken@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        PostmarketOS is a thing. A lot of the software is already available for Linux. People just keep pretending it doesn’t exist and keep spouting the same tired anti-Linux rhetoric ad nauseum.

        Heck, I bet you could make a phone call from a bloody Pi Zero with a 4g & UPS HAT.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          That’s a bit unfair. Postmarket is super cool and I can’t wait to get a Linux phone. But let’s not pretend it’s ready to be daily driven. Even on the best supported phones there are still hardware driver compatibility issues. And that’s not even speaking about the software catalog. Even in the privacy community, a lot of people regard banking apps as mandatory. Good luck ever getting those to run there.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m developing an app as a side project, but testing can only happen meaningfully out in the field. I found a breaking bug yesterday, asked Claude to fix and deploy over remote session. I installed the update and continued ny testing session.

    I sure wouldn’t want that to go away.