Most of the time the companies say the layoffs are because AI is doing people jobs, but the reality is that making things that use AI is just a lot more expensive. And enabling employees to use AI more than the free tier is really expensive too. So, they need to cut cost elsewhere to balance it out.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Clay Magouyrk (CEO):
    Larry, in order to pay for these datacenters we might need to cut up to 20,000 jobs.

    Larry Ellison:
    Cut 30,000.

    Clay Magouyrk:
    But Larry, 20,000 would be more than…

    Larry Ellison:

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Tens of thousands of employees and not one of them knows how to make a good error message

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I was once told by Oracle engineers that it would take 18-24 months to add a drop down with auto complete to their ticketing system.

      They don’t have good engineers because Oracle is a law firm pretending to be a tech company.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        They don’t have good engineers because Oracle is a law firm pretending to be a tech company.

        We call this the IBM business plan.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Not sure the engineers are entirely at fault for how long things take there. I’m guessing they must have some insane review and release processes with significant bottlenecks and it’s all because of their structure

        • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I recall reading an ex oracle engineer say that the code base is basically spaghetti. Not only that, but you basically have to be lucky to get your pr in, as due to said spaghetti, there is a high chance that it will be broken by the pr merged before yours.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Which code base? All of them? They have a lot of products.

            But of course it could also be all of them

          • rozodru@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            I worked with a guy that used to work at Oracle and he pretty much said the same thing. Essentially if you sneezed anywhere within a 10km radius of Oracles code base (and it didn’t matter which product) you ran the risk of it all crashing down. dudes spent more time talking about how to theoretically fix something as opposed to actually fixing it.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          These guys were blown away when I showed them the same feature in a competitor’s product.

          The company I worked for had just been bought by Oracle and we were under a directive to switch to all Oracle software, so I guess they weren’t motivated because there wasn’t extra money in it.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Okay, yikes. I didn’t think it could be THAT bad, but I guess Oracle never fails to surprise.

            • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              The worst part is that it was all down to our existing system being owned by Salesforce, and Larry Ellison hating the CEO of Salesforce.

              We could still use Amazon and Microsoft products but nothing from Saleforce because Uncle Larry was butthurt.

      • reddfugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Bbbbut, they also sell a payroll & HR system that is somehow even worse than SAP’s! The main goal of all their Fusion Cloud junk seems to be producing consulting fees, because it’s impossible to get anything to work without them.

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oracle Employment Numbers Trend (Approximate) 2025: 162,000 2024: 159,000 2023: 164,000 2022: 143,000 2021: 132,000 2020: 135,000 2015: 132,000 2011: 108,000

  • allywilson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And enabling employees to use AI more than the free tier is really expensive too.

    The cost is upfront for training the LLM, then they have to sell the end product to us (to recuperate costs, start training the next 500B model, etc.), so giving their employees access to a higher tier of LLM is relatively minimal cost, inference isn’t exactly cheap, but I think they could afford to give their employees access to higher models.

    But, this is Oracle I guess.