McConnell’s entire legacy can be summed up in one cowardly act: After Donald Trump whipped up a mob to attack our Capitol, threatening to kill the Speaker of the House and the Vice President, in an attempt to overturn a presidential election, he condemned Trump.
“Former President Trump’s actions that preceded the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty,” McConnell said. “Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.”
But McConnell voted to acquit him of insurrection, allowing him to run for president again.
That and denying a Supreme Court nominee a hearing. He’s totally OK violating the Constitution.
“he (the President) shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for”
Although given how Garland turned out at DOJ, we may have dodged a bullet there.
Garland was a compromise pick by obama. He was the most centrist republican that obama could find to try and get him appointed. He just wasn’t a federalist society whack job.
Right. He put up a candidate the Republicans couldn’t possibly object to . . . and yet they did anyway. This is what you get for trying to play Republicans at their own game.
They didn’t even have a chance to object to him, McConnell blocked him from having a hearing.
That’s the point. If they were being reasonable and honest they would have held a hearing for him, because he’s a candidate they could agree with. They were forced to make a choice to admit playing a cheap game or elect him and give up their possible future of absolute control of the SCOTUS. Sadly making them admit this seemed to not actually sway many peoples opinions, and they only went further if anything.
Yup, they literally had no objections to him but blocked him anyway. It was probably a reasonable attempt by Obama to minimize damage, since Garland certainly would have upheld Roe and moderated other conservatives on the Court.
But in retrospect, since it didn’t work, I think we all would have liked to know what a “swing for the fences” pick plus a media shame blitz on McConnell would have accomplished.
But that was Obama - a politician that was good objectively, but didn’t really take any risks or press any advantages out of fear of being labeled extreme, so also squandered a depressing number of opportunities to improve the country.
He also stacked the SCOTUS by contradictory practices, denying Obama a pick in the last year of his presidency but giving one to Trump. That has had grave consequences for recent rulings since Trump only nominated extreme conservatives.
scotus should be a 5-4 majority the other way right now.
If you count the elections where it should have gone the other way based on the popular vote, more like 6-3 liberal majority, and arguably even 8-1 with Thomas being the sole holdout.
Trump’s 2016 “win” gave them three justices. Bush didn’t get any nominations his first term (which he only won via the electoral college), and then went on to get two his second term (where he did get the popular vote). So it depends on if you expect Republicans to win the popular vote in 2004 or not if they didn’t already have the office.
more like 6-3 liberal majority, and arguably even 8-1 with Thomas being the sole holdout.
this is also true. but thomas shouldn’t even be there, either.
One of the most damaging traitors in this country’s history. I wish him the worst.
Fuck this asshole. Few people have done as much damage as he has and the worst part is we’re only going to get someone worse.
It can’t get worse. He found the bottom and decided to go deeper. Nobody can replace his level of destruction of the United States. It will take a genuine master class asshole to come close.
I think that you are correct here. He comes from an old school way of looking at the world, pre-Boomer, which was really a lot of “I get mine and it’s ok if I take yours to get it”. These people built out the country to exclude minorities and take away power from women. His replacement will certainly be much younger and have a completely different viewpoint on the world.
God I hope so, but I have a feeling it’s going to be another monster; just without the spectre of death looming over them like the rainbow after a storm.
It can be another cluster but I’m also hopeful that a younger person will tone it down. The senate tends to be more moderate too.
It most certainly can though I agree it would take someone with exceptional skill and complete moral bankruptcy. Every time I think the 'pubs can’t sink any lower, they betray my expectations.
I don’t think we’ll get someone that’s both as evil AND as effective as him.
What has made him the big bad for so long is that he’s really good at what he does. He’s a perfect mixture of professional competence and evil. Trump is a cartoon villain, but what enabled Trump was the terrible machine that Mitch built.
I don’t know if the US has ever had a politician who has had a more harmful impact. Without Mitch we’d be in a much better place even if the GOP held all branches of government.
Maybe Woodrow Wilson.
I haven’t voiced this before, but after seeing him and his actions for the last 10-15 years… I’ve grown to literally hate him. That smug turtle faced prick. I hate him so much. He’s done so much damage to America. He stalled us on decades of progress. He’s a piece of shit that deserves his shitty health and to rot in hell.
I’m sorry if that’s harsh to say about another human being, but, he is one who truly does not care about anyone but himself and to ‘stick it’ to everyone else who isn’t on his side. He’s truly an evil man.
Few people deserve ire to this degree. He happens to be one of them.
I feel similarly but this guy’s face will never be as punchable as Matt Gaetz. I would pay lots of money to see him get kicked in the nuts.
You mean statutory rapist Matt Gaetz? The one that sexually assaulted a woman? That Matt Gaetz? Of Florida?
It is a harsh thing to say about another human being. It’s also being kinder than he deserves.
It’s ok. Politicians are not people, they are symbols. You can hate a symbol all you like. You can also hate someone who would become that symbol. It doesn’t make you a bad person to point out that someone else is causing the world harm.
He must be on deaths door bc there ain’t now way otherwise he’d ever do this
He says that the recent death of a close family member caused him to re-evaluate priorities, I can get on board with that.
His own health issues almost certainly played a factor there. He’s 82 and clearly having some issues. I’m surprised he’s even holding out until November.
That press conference where his brain rebooted mid sentence was crazy.
He’s not just holding out till November, he’s holding out until his term expires in 2027!
Retiring as leader but still keeping his senate seat. Any day that man is still allowed in Congress is a bad day, no matter what chair he sits in.
Believe it or not, McConnell’s home state of Kentucky currently has a Democratic governor, so if McConnell vacated his seat, the governor would appoint a Democrat to fill it until a special election could be held. No way in hell a guy like Mitch would allow something like that to happen while he’s still drawing breath.
I’m pretty sure Kentucky passed a bill saying that the replacement must be of the same party.
deleted by creator
This guy was great in Pans Labyrinth!
Goodbye you cowardly worthless skin sack full of excrement! May you stub the same toe on every corner.
No not the same toe. You’d get used to that. I want it to be a different toe every time. Also give him hang nails.
Ingrown nails on the toes he stubs
Ingrown nails first, makes them extra sensitive 😈
I’ve got one ever better. Hopefully he has to place a nail under his toenail and kick a wall
Place a nail under his ingrown toenail
Better make it infected.
fuck him. he should resign from the senate completely.
sincerely, lifetime kentucky resident
I’d like him to also resign from being alive. Unfortunately, the damage is already done, so him dying really has a negligible effect other than not having to hear from him anymore, which is a grace I think this planet has earned.
not necessarily. if he dies our democrats governor gets to pick the next senator despite what an unconstitutional law says.
I’m not one to bet however I would be willing to bet my first born and the farm, on the basis that McConnell is a lich.
Does he know he’s stepping down? Has anybody told his nurse to give him the message?
deleted by creator
I would devote a year of full time work to exercise and training if I knew I’d get one chance to punch him right in the face
Mitch McConnell, on the other hand, is a coward who sold his own soul and his own country for wealth and power, and ultimately the holder of his notes has ended up being Vladimir Putin.
Shockingly, Mitch has been one of the few Republicans to support giving weapons and money to Ukraine.
https://kentuckylantern.com/2024/02/16/on-ukraine-aid-mcconnell-acted-on-principle-not-politics/
Yea of late the House had been so crazy that Mitch supporting Ukraine and the boarder deal makes him seem moderate. Which is a horrid sign of where things are. I equally wouldn’t be shocked if he said he was stepping because of the party’s shift. Also a horrid sign since he as a massive factor in making it crazy.
The only good outcome from Trump getting elected was seeing Mitch McConnell squirm for 4 years.
Mother fucker still played the game though.
Kissinger wasn’t a traitor for foreign pay against his adopted homeland.
We’re going to have to agree to disagree on that one. Henry Kissinger is uniquely responsible for the modern quagmire of a relationship that exists between the United States and Israel.
deleted by creator
I agree with all of the things you said. However, Henry Kissinger was essentially the father of modern neo-conservative foreign policy, and those policies are largely what led to the manipulation of the United States government by AIPAC and the Israeli government. There are a multitude of other factors as you suggest, but don’t act for one second like Henry Kissinger wasn’t Jewish first and American second.
deleted by creator
Good riddance. I’m sure his successor with be much worse, but I’ll welcome this news for now.
Worth noting that his successor will likely control the Senate come 2025, as Democrats have a snowball’s chance in hell of holding it after Manchin retires.
edit: Not sure why y’all are knee-jerk downvoting a statement of fact that the 2024 Senate map is awful. Democrats would have to win all toss up races to keep 50 seats, so I’m not expressing some kind of personal judgment here, and downvoting doesn’t make that truth go away. Do something more productive with your downvote fingers.
I agree they shouldn’t be downvoting you, the math is not good for senate Democrats. But it wasn’t good last time, either, and they gained a seat.
Anything can happen.
I haven’t actually looked at the Senate races this year, but let’s take a look!
20 Democrats, 11 Republican
And one of those Democrat seats is WV. While Democrats like to complain about Joe Manchin, he is probably the only Democrat who could win any statewide office in WV. His decision to not run makes keeping his seat nearly impossible for Democrats. And the 11 Republican seats are all quite safe. Rick Scott in FL and Ted Cruz in TX are the only ones Democrats have any shot at all at.
The best Democrats can hope for is to keep the rest of their seats, which will leave the Senate at 50/50 (leaving control up to whoever the VP is).
Synema in AZ is the one I have no clue how it’s going to go. Nobody likes her.
Remember she’s technically an independent now, and the Democrats are running someone against her.
Last time I read anything about that race, I believe the Dem was leading polling in a potential 3 way race there.
I would have to imagine that if Synema did not run, that would overall help the Dem candidate.
Fingers crossed.
And one of those Democrat seats is WV. While Democrats like to complain about Joe Manchin, he is probably the only Democrat who could win any statewide office in WV.
Yeah. I’ve voted for him every general election, and usually against him in the primary but people really need to understand this - your choices are Manchin or a Republican, not Manchin or a different Democrat.
WV was a safe blue state until 2000. But it was a blue state because of the unions. And Gore was the one who really started pushing hard against the largest union industries in the state, which is why the state flipped so hard and so suddenly.
WV was a safe blue state until 2000. But it was a blue state because of the unions. And Gore was the one who really started pushing hard against the largest union industries in the state, which is why the state flipped so hard and so suddenly.
This is a huge thing that a lot of people, especially young people (millennials included here), tend to miss.
I may not have narrowed it down to Gore specifically, but at some point between, say…1985 and 2000…the Democratic party really seemed to just take unions and blue collar workers for granted…people who’d been a historic pillar of the party.
I’m not sure why this happened, but I suspect deep pockets of donors in big business had a part in it. Regardless, that decision may have had its desired effect in the short term, but in the long term, it basically put the Rust Belt in play. PA, OH, IN, MI, WI, and MN could/should be solid bets to break blue in every national race, but now you have these states full of registered Democrats who have voted Republican in at least half of the last six elections.
I always thought that WV was more about coal, but the union angle makes a ton of sense as well, and through that lens, it makes perfect sense to include them as maybe “Rust Belt adjacent”.
I may not have narrowed it down to Gore specifically, but at some point between, say…1985 and 2000…the Democratic party really seemed to just take unions and blue collar workers for granted…people who’d been a historic pillar of the party.
They backed away from unions and started putting more emphasis on identity over that period, but for WV it was Gore attacking the coal industry that triggered the switch over. WV was only Democrat because of the unions and the largest union industry was the coal miners. It doesn’t matter if you pay lip service to supporting unions if you’re also expressing a dedication to shutting down the biggest union industry in the region.
I always thought that WV was more about coal, but the union angle makes a ton of sense as well,
The two are fundamentally linked. What do you think the biggest union in WV was? There was never a solid Democrat support of coal, but so long as they were pro-union and didn’t actively attack coal they were going to keep WV. Instead they went increasingly
Don’t let the door hit your ass on the w-- actually scratch that, I hope the door hits you so hard on the way out that you spend the remainder of miserable life managing broken ass related complications.
People like you make me wish hell was real.
Fucking traitor.
I wish his time left in this life is full of heartache and despair. Fuck You Mitch.
A pinnacle of how flawed the American government is, 39 years in our government thus far. 2 senators per state with no term limits and I still hear people argue that the senate serves a good purpose.
