

Aren’t you not supposed to train LLMs on LLM-generated content?
Also he should call it Grok 5; so powerful that it skips over 4. That would be very characteristic of him
Aren’t you not supposed to train LLMs on LLM-generated content?
Also he should call it Grok 5; so powerful that it skips over 4. That would be very characteristic of him
They’re saying when you’re in the middle of shitting you can also piss but if you’re in the middle of exclusively pissing you can’t shit cause (if you have a penis) you’re standing up.
Who shit myself
What are you doing step bee
They did surgery on a tardigrade
That’s my favorite thing about it. Not only did the chat get under his skin, but he also failed to prove the starlink in-flight wifi capability - the reason he was streaming in the first place. He failed on all fronts
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I hate Musk more than anyone but holy shit this is embarrassing.
“BREAKING: I asked my magic 8 ball if trump wants to blow up the moon and it said Outlook Good!!! I have a degree in political science.”
Why would you post something so controversial yet so brave
Holy based
Ah yeah good point
Dumb tax as in tax for being dumb. I was joking.
I think “stupid tax” is the more common verbiage, I’ve updated it
The majority of the cost is stupid tax
Does that include other people who only murder murderers? And yourself?
Consume the accumulated wealth, power, and privilege of the affluent elite in an act of radical socioeconomic retribution driven by the pursuit of equity and justice for the disenfranchised masses
When there’s someone behind me with their brights on, i roll down the window and hold my palm over my left mirror so they can see me blocking the light (it has never worked)
No. You can raise concerns about a potential vulnerability without having identified a specific real-world method of exploitation.
Not math but the discovery of Thermus aquaticus was seemingly useless but later had profound applications in medicine. There’s a good Veritasium video on it